IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i11p3813-d363775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occurrence of Halogenated Pollutants in Domestic and Occupational Indoor Dust

Author

Listed:
  • Giulia Simonetti

    (Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Patrizia Di Filippo

    (Dipartimento innovazioni tecnologiche e sicurezza degli impianti, prodotti e insediamenti antropici, Istituto Nazionale per l’Assicurazione contri gli Infortuni sul Lavoro (INAIL), 00143 Rome, Italy)

  • Carmela Riccardi

    (Dipartimento innovazioni tecnologiche e sicurezza degli impianti, prodotti e insediamenti antropici, Istituto Nazionale per l’Assicurazione contri gli Infortuni sul Lavoro (INAIL), 00143 Rome, Italy)

  • Donatella Pomata

    (Dipartimento innovazioni tecnologiche e sicurezza degli impianti, prodotti e insediamenti antropici, Istituto Nazionale per l’Assicurazione contri gli Infortuni sul Lavoro (INAIL), 00143 Rome, Italy)

  • Elisa Sonego

    (Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Francesca Buiarelli

    (Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

The occurrence of halogenated organic pollutants in indoor dust can be high due to the presence of textile, electronic devices, furniture, and building materials treated with these chemicals. In this explorative study, we focused on emerging organic pollutants, such as novel brominated flame retardants (nBFRs) and some perfluoroalkyl substances, together with legacy polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (BDEs) in settled dust collected in houses and workplaces such as one office and two electrotechnical and mechanical workshops. The total contribution of the investigated pollutants was lower in house and in office dusts except for few nBFRs (such as bis (2-ethylhexyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrabromo-phthalate at a concentration of 464.5 ng/g in a house and hexachlorocyclopentadienyldibromocyclooctane at 40.4 ng/g in the office), whereas in electrotechnical and mechanical workshops a high incidence of PCBs, BDEs, and nBFRs occurred (for example, BDE 209 at a concentration of 2368.0 ng/g and tetrabromobisphenol A at 32,320.1 ng/g in electrotechnical and mechanical workshops). Estimated daily intakes were also calculated, showing that domestic and occupational environments can lead to a similar contribution in terms of human exposure. The higher exposure contribution was associated to nBFRs, whose EDIs were in the range of 3968.2–555,694.2 pg/kg bw/day. To provide a complete view about the indoor contamination, in this investigation, we also included polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their oxygenated and nitrated derivatives. Definitely, dust collection represents a simple, fast, and cost-effective sampling and dust contamination level can be a useful indicator of environment healthiness. Besides, the presented method can be a smart tool to provide a time and money saving technique to characterize 99 pollutants thanks to a single sample treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulia Simonetti & Patrizia Di Filippo & Carmela Riccardi & Donatella Pomata & Elisa Sonego & Francesca Buiarelli, 2020. "Occurrence of Halogenated Pollutants in Domestic and Occupational Indoor Dust," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3813-:d:363775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3813/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3813/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Donatella Pomata & Patrizia Di Filippo & Carmela Riccardi & Federica Castellani & Giulia Simonetti & Elisa Sonego & Francesca Buiarelli, 2021. "Toxic Organic Contaminants in Airborne Particles: Levels, Potential Sources and Risk Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3813-:d:363775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.