Author
Listed:
- Amanda J. Wheeler
(Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne 3000, Australia
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia)
- Ryan W. Allen
(Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada)
- Kerryn Lawrence
(Mid North Coast Local Health District, Port Macquarie 2444, Australia)
- Christopher T. Roulston
(Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale 3195, Australia)
- Jennifer Powell
(Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale 3195, Australia)
- Grant J. Williamson
(School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, NSW Bushfire Risk Management Research Hub, Hobart 7000, Australia)
- Penelope J. Jones
(Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia)
- Fabienne Reisen
(Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale 3195, Australia)
- Geoffrey G. Morgan
(Sydney School of Public Health, and University Centre for Rural Health, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia)
- Fay H. Johnston
(Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Australia)
Abstract
During extreme air pollution events, such as bushfires, public health agencies often recommend that vulnerable individuals visit a nearby public building with central air conditioning to reduce their exposure to smoke. However, there is limited evidence that these “cleaner indoor air shelters” reduce exposure or health risks. We quantified the impact of a “cleaner indoor air shelter” in a public library in Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia when concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) were elevated during a local peat fire and nearby bushfires. Specifically, we evaluated the air quality improvements with central air conditioning only and with the use of portable high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter air cleaners. We measured PM 2.5 from August 2019 until February 2020 by deploying pairs of low-cost PM 2.5 sensors (i) inside the main library, (ii) in a smaller media room inside the library, (iii) outside the library, and (iv) co-located with regulatory monitors located in the town. We operated two HEPA cleaners in the media room from August until October 2019. We quantified the infiltration efficiency of outdoor PM 2.5 concentrations, defined as the fraction of the outdoor PM 2.5 concentration that penetrates indoors and remains suspended, as well as the additional effect of HEPA cleaners on PM 2.5 concentrations. The infiltration efficiency of outdoor PM 2.5 into the air-conditioned main library was 30%, meaning that compared to the PM 2.5 concentration outdoors, the concentrations of outdoor-generated PM 2.5 indoors were reduced by 70%. In the media room, when the HEPA cleaners were operating, PM 2.5 concentrations were reduced further with a PM 2.5 infiltration efficiency of 17%. A carefully selected air-conditioned public building could be used as a cleaner indoor air shelter during episodes of elevated smoke emissions. Further improvements in indoor air quality within the building can be achieved by operating appropriately sized HEPA cleaners.
Suggested Citation
Amanda J. Wheeler & Ryan W. Allen & Kerryn Lawrence & Christopher T. Roulston & Jennifer Powell & Grant J. Williamson & Penelope J. Jones & Fabienne Reisen & Geoffrey G. Morgan & Fay H. Johnston, 2021.
"Can Public Spaces Effectively Be Used as Cleaner Indoor Air Shelters during Extreme Smoke Events?,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-8, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4085-:d:535055
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:8:p:4085-:d:535055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.