Author
Listed:
- Emma Cedstrand
(Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden)
- Anna Nyberg
(Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden)
- Sara Sanchez-Bengtsson
(Center of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm Region, 113 65 Stockholm, Sweden)
- Magnus Alderling
(Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
Center of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm Region, 113 65 Stockholm, Sweden)
- Hanna Augustsson
(Medical Management Centre, Procome Research Group, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden)
- Theo Bodin
(Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
Center of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm Region, 113 65 Stockholm, Sweden)
- Helle Mölsted Alvesson
(Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden)
- Gun Johansson
(Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Occupational Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
Center of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Stockholm Region, 113 65 Stockholm, Sweden)
Abstract
Work-related stress is a global problem causing suffering and economic costs. In Sweden, employees in human service occupations are overrepresented among persons on sick leave due to mental health problems such as stress-related disorders. The psychosocial work environment is one contributing factor for this problem, making it urgent to identify effective methods to decrease stress at the workplace. The aim of the study is to evaluate a participatory intervention to improve the psychosocial work environment and mental health using an embedded mixed methods design. The study is a controlled trial with a parallel process evaluation exploring fidelity and participants’ reactions to the intervention activities, experiences of learning and changes in behaviours and work routines. We collected data through documentation, interviews and three waves of questionnaires. Our results show small changes in behaviours and work routines and no positive effects of the intervention on the psychosocial work environment nor health outcomes. One explanation is end-users’ perceived lack of involvement over the process causing the intervention to be seen as a burden. Another explanation is that the intervention activities were perceived targeting the wrong organisational level. A representative participation over both content and process can be an effective strategy to change psychosocial working conditions and mental health.
Suggested Citation
Emma Cedstrand & Anna Nyberg & Sara Sanchez-Bengtsson & Magnus Alderling & Hanna Augustsson & Theo Bodin & Helle Mölsted Alvesson & Gun Johansson, 2021.
"A Participatory Intervention to Improve the Psychosocial Work Environment and Mental Health in Human Service Organisations. A Mixed Methods Evaluation Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-19, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3546-:d:526218
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Malene Friis Andersen & Karina Nielsen & Jeppe Zielinski Nguyen Ajslev, 2021.
"The Relational Fit in Organizational Interventions—What Can Organizational Research Learn from Research in Psychotherapy?,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, July.
- Emma Cedstrand & Helle Mølsted Alvesson & Hanna Augustsson & Theo Bodin & Erika Bodin & Anna Nyberg & Gun Johansson, 2021.
"Co-Creating an Occupational Health Intervention within the Construction Industry in Sweden: Stakeholder Perceptions of the Process and Output,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-14, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:7:p:3546-:d:526218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.