IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p8104-d605500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relational Fit in Organizational Interventions—What Can Organizational Research Learn from Research in Psychotherapy?

Author

Listed:
  • Malene Friis Andersen

    (National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Department of Psychosocial Work Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Karina Nielsen

    (Institute of Work Psychology, Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 1FL, UK)

  • Jeppe Zielinski Nguyen Ajslev

    (National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Department of Psychosocial Work Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

There is a growing interest in organizational interventions (OI) aiming to increase employees’ well-being. An OI involves changes in the way work is designed, organized, and managed. Studies have shown that an OI’s positive results are increased if there is a good fit between context and intervention and between participant and intervention. In this article, we propose that a third fit—the Relational Fit (R-Fit)—also plays an important role in determining an intervention’s outcome. The R-Fit consists of factors related to (1) the employees participating in the OI, (2) the intervention facilitator, and (3) the quality of the relation between participants and the intervention facilitator. The concept of the R-Fit is inspired by research in psychotherapy documenting that participant factors, therapist factors, and the quality of the relations explain 40% of the effect of an intervention. We call attention to the importance of systematically evaluating and improving the R-Fit in OIs. This is important to enhance the positive outcomes in OIs and thereby increase both the well-being and productivity of employees. We introduce concrete measures that can be used to study and evaluate the R-Fit. This article is the first to combine knowledge from research in psychotherapy with research on OIs.

Suggested Citation

  • Malene Friis Andersen & Karina Nielsen & Jeppe Zielinski Nguyen Ajslev, 2021. "The Relational Fit in Organizational Interventions—What Can Organizational Research Learn from Research in Psychotherapy?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8104-:d:605500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emma Cedstrand & Anna Nyberg & Sara Sanchez-Bengtsson & Magnus Alderling & Hanna Augustsson & Theo Bodin & Helle Mölsted Alvesson & Gun Johansson, 2021. "A Participatory Intervention to Improve the Psychosocial Work Environment and Mental Health in Human Service Organisations. A Mixed Methods Evaluation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Bozana Arapovic-Johansson & Irene Jensen & Charlotte Wåhlin & Christina Björklund & Lydia Kwak, 2020. "Process Evaluation of a Participative Organizational Intervention as a Stress Preventive Intervention for Employees in Swedish Primary Health Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emma Cedstrand & Helle Mølsted Alvesson & Hanna Augustsson & Theo Bodin & Erika Bodin & Anna Nyberg & Gun Johansson, 2021. "Co-Creating an Occupational Health Intervention within the Construction Industry in Sweden: Stakeholder Perceptions of the Process and Output," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Magnus Akerstrom & Linda Corin & Jonathan Severin & Ingibjörg H. Jonsdottir & Lisa Björk, 2021. "Can Working Conditions and Employees’ Mental Health Be Improved via Job Stress Interventions Designed and Implemented by Line Managers and Human Resources on an Operational Level?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Dawid Szurgacz & Sergey Zhironkin & Jiří Pokorný & A. J. S. (Sam) Spearing & Stefan Vöth & Michal Cehlár & Izabela Kowalewska, 2021. "Development of an Active Training Method for Belt Conveyor," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Irene Jensen & Zana Arapovic-Johansson & Emmanuel Aboagye, 2022. "The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Productivity Measurement and Enhancement System Intervention to Reduce Employee Work-Related Stress and Enhance Work Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8104-:d:605500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.