IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i4p1628-d495856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Halogenated Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Samples and Inorganic Elements Levels in Ores for Characterizing a High Anthropogenic Polluted Area in the Northern Latium Region (Italy)

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Vincenzo Russo

    (Department of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences (DiAAA), University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy)

  • Ivan Notardonato

    (Department of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences (DiAAA), University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy)

  • Alberto Rosada

    (ENEA Cassacia Research Center, 00060 Rome, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Ianiri

    (Department of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences (DiAAA), University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy)

  • Pasquale Avino

    (Department of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences (DiAAA), University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy)

Abstract

This paper shows a characterization of the organic and inorganic fraction of river waters (Tiber and Marta) and ores/soil samples collected in the Northern Latium region of Italy for evaluating the anthropogenic/natural source contribution to the environmental pollution of this area. For organic compounds, organochloride volatile compounds in Tiber and Marta rivers were analyzed by two different clean-up methods (i.e., liquid–liquid extraction and static headspace) followed by gas chromatography–electron capture detector (GC-ECD) analysis. The results show very high concentrations of bromoform (up to 1.82 and 3.2 µg L −1 in Tiber and Marta rivers, respectively), due to the presence of greenhouse crops, and of chloroform and tetrachloroethene, due to the presence of handicrafts installations. For the qualitative and quantitative assessment of the inorganic fraction, it is highlighted the use of a nuclear analytical method, instrumental neutron activation analysis, which allows having more information as possible from the sample without performing any chemical-physical pretreatment. The results have evidenced high levels of mercury (mean value 88.6 µg g −1 ), antimony (77.7 µg g −1 ), strontium (12,039 µg g −1 ) and zinc (103 µg g −1 ), whereas rare earth elements show levels similar to the literature data. Particular consideration is drawn for arsenic (414 µg g −1 ): the levels found in this paper (ranging between 1 and 5100 µg g −1 ) explain the high content of such element (as arsenates) in the aquifer, a big issue in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Vincenzo Russo & Ivan Notardonato & Alberto Rosada & Giuseppe Ianiri & Pasquale Avino, 2021. "Halogenated Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Samples and Inorganic Elements Levels in Ores for Characterizing a High Anthropogenic Polluted Area in the Northern Latium Region (Italy)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1628-:d:495856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Tibshirani & Guenther Walther & Trevor Hastie, 2001. "Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(2), pages 411-423.
    2. Jin Wu & Yanguo Teng & Sijin Lu & Yeyao Wang & Xudong Jiao, 2014. "Evaluation of Soil Contamination Indices in a Mining Area of Jiangxi, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thiemo Fetzer & Samuel Marden, 2017. "Take What You Can: Property Rights, Contestability and Conflict," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(601), pages 757-783, May.
    2. Daniel Agness & Travis Baseler & Sylvain Chassang & Pascaline Dupas & Erik Snowberg, 2022. "Valuing the Time of the Self-Employed," Working Papers 2022-2, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    3. Khanh Duong, 2024. "Is meritocracy just? New evidence from Boolean analysis and Machine learning," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1795-1821, October.
    4. Batool, Fatima & Hennig, Christian, 2021. "Clustering with the Average Silhouette Width," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Nicoleta Serban & Huijing Jiang, 2012. "Multilevel Functional Clustering Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 805-814, September.
    6. Orietta Nicolis & Jean Paul Maidana & Fabian Contreras & Danilo Leal, 2024. "Analyzing the Impact of COVID-19 on Economic Sustainability: A Clustering Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-30, February.
    7. Li, Pai-Ling & Chiou, Jeng-Min, 2011. "Identifying cluster number for subspace projected functional data clustering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 2090-2103, June.
    8. Yaeji Lim & Hee-Seok Oh & Ying Kuen Cheung, 2019. "Multiscale Clustering for Functional Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(2), pages 368-391, July.
    9. Forzani, Liliana & Gieco, Antonella & Tolmasky, Carlos, 2017. "Likelihood ratio test for partial sphericity in high and ultra-high dimensions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 18-38.
    10. Yujia Li & Xiangrui Zeng & Chien‐Wei Lin & George C. Tseng, 2022. "Simultaneous estimation of cluster number and feature sparsity in high‐dimensional cluster analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 574-585, June.
    11. Vojtech Blazek & Michal Petruzela & Tomas Vantuch & Zdenek Slanina & Stanislav Mišák & Wojciech Walendziuk, 2020. "The Estimation of the Influence of Household Appliances on the Power Quality in a Microgrid System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Andrew Clark & Alexander Mihailov & Michael Zargham, 2024. "Complex Systems Modeling of Community Inclusion Currencies," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(2), pages 1259-1294, August.
    13. Nicoleta Serban, 2008. "Estimating and clustering curves in the presence of heteroscedastic errors," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 553-571.
    14. Caruso, Germán & Scartascini, Carlos & Tommasi, Mariano, 2015. "Are we all playing the same game? The economic effects of constitutions depend on the degree of institutionalization," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 212-228.
    15. Alessandro Crimi & Olivier Commowick & Adil Maarouf & Jean-Christophe Ferré & Elise Bannier & Ayman Tourbah & Isabelle Berry & Jean-Philippe Ranjeva & Gilles Edan & Christian Barillot, 2014. "Predictive Value of Imaging Markers at Multiple Sclerosis Disease Onset Based on Gadolinium- and USPIO-Enhanced MRI and Machine Learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, April.
    16. Mehmet Çağlar & Cem Gürler, 2022. "Sustainable Development Goals: A cluster analysis of worldwide countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8593-8624, June.
    17. Elizabeth Tipton & Robert B. Olsen, "undated". "Enhancing the Generalizability of Impact Studies in Education," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 35d5625333dc480aba9765b3b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    18. Cyril Atkinson-Clement & Eléonore Pigalle, 2021. "What can we learn from Covid-19 pandemic’s impact on human behaviour? The case of France’s lockdown," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Jelle R Dalenberg & Luca Nanetti & Remco J Renken & René A de Wijk & Gert J ter Horst, 2014. "Dealing with Consumer Differences in Liking during Repeated Exposure to Food; Typical Dynamics in Rating Behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    20. Daniel Lewis & Davide Melcangi & Laura Pilossoph, 2019. "Latent Heterogeneity in the Marginal Propensity to Consume," 2019 Meeting Papers 519, Society for Economic Dynamics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:4:p:1628-:d:495856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.