IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13387-d706223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender-Based Violence Risk Mitigation by Non-GBV Specialists Prior to and during COVID-19: A Global Survey of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Humanitarian Practitioners

Author

Listed:
  • Vandana Sharma

    (Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
    Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA)

  • Annika Gompers

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA)

  • Jocelyn T. D. Kelly

    (Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Erin Patrick

    (CARE, New York, NY 10017, USA)

  • Christine Heckman

    (United Nations Children’s Fund, New York, NY 10038, USA)

  • Arsema Solomon

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA)

  • Jennifer Scott

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA
    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

Abstract

Available evidence indicates that the COVID-19 pandemic and response measures may lead to increased risk of gender-based violence (GBV), including in humanitarian contexts. This study examined the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of humanitarian practitioners related to GBV risk mitigation approaches during COVID-19 in order to refine current guidance and inform future materials. A global, online cross-sectional survey of humanitarian practitioners was conducted between November 2020 and April 2021. We calculated descriptive statistics and used Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests to compare knowledge, attitudes, and practices among GBV specialists and non-specialists. Of 170 respondents, 58% were female and 44% were GBV specialists. Almost all (95%) of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they have a role to play in GBV risk mitigation. Compared to GBV specialists, a higher proportion of non-specialists reported little to no knowledge on GBV risk mitigation global guidance (38% vs. 7%, p < 0.001) and on how to respond to a disclosure of GBV (18% vs. 3%, p < 0.001). Respondents reported several barriers to integrating GBV risk mitigation into their work during COVID-19, including insufficient funding, capacity, knowledge, and guidance. Efforts to mainstream GBV risk mitigation actions should continue and intensify, leveraging the lessons and experiences generated thus far.

Suggested Citation

  • Vandana Sharma & Annika Gompers & Jocelyn T. D. Kelly & Erin Patrick & Christine Heckman & Arsema Solomon & Jennifer Scott, 2021. "Gender-Based Violence Risk Mitigation by Non-GBV Specialists Prior to and during COVID-19: A Global Survey of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Humanitarian Practitioners," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13387-:d:706223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13387/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13387/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amber Peterman & Alina Potts & Megan O'Donnell & Kelly Thompson & Niyati Shah & Sabine Oertelt-Prigione & Nicole van Gelder, 2020. "Pandemics and Violence Against Women and Children," Working Papers 528, Center for Global Development.
    2. Karen M Devries & Joelle Y Mak & Loraine J Bacchus & Jennifer C Child & Gail Falder & Max Petzold & Jill Astbury & Charlotte H Watts, 2013. "Intimate Partner Violence and Incident Depressive Symptoms and Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-11, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luissa Vahedi & Ilana Seff & Deidi Olaya Rodriguez & Samantha McNelly & Ana Isabel Interiano Perez & Dorcas Erskine & Catherine Poulton & Lindsay Stark, 2022. "“ At the Root of COVID Grew a More Complicated Situation ”: A Qualitative Analysis of the Guatemalan Gender-Based Violence Prevention and Response System during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahmud, Mahreen & Riley, Emma, 2021. "Household response to an extreme shock: Evidence on the immediate impact of the Covid-19 lockdown on economic outcomes and well-being in rural Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Díaz, Juan-José & Saldarriaga, Victor, 2023. "A drop of love? Rainfall shocks and spousal abuse: Evidence from rural Peru," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Yolanda Mejías-Martín & Celia Martí-García & Yolanda Rodríguez-Mejías & Ana Alejandra Esteban-Burgos & Víctor Cruz-García & María Paz García-Caro, 2023. "Understanding for Prevention: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of Suicide Notes and Forensic Reports," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Francisco Cabrera-Hernández & Marí­a Padilla-Romo, 2020. "Hidden Violence: How COVID-19 School Closures Reduced the Reporting of Child Maltreatment," Working Papers 2020-02, University of Tennessee, Department of Economics.
    5. Bloem, Jeffrey R. & Salemi, Colette, 2021. "COVID-19 and conflict," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Diksha Sapkota & Kathleen Baird & Amornrat Saito & Pappu Rijal & Rita Pokharel & Debra Anderson, 2020. "‘We don’t see because we don’t ask’: Qualitative exploration of service users’ and health professionals’ views regarding a psychosocial intervention targeting pregnant women experiencing domestic and ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Gustavo J Bobonis & Roberto Castro & Juan S Morales, 2020. "Legal Reforms, Conditional Cash Transfers, and Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from Mexico," Working Papers tecipa-678, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    8. Eleonora Crapolicchio & Vincenza Cinquegrana & Camillo Regalia, 2023. "The Role of Positivity on Depressive Symptoms in Women Seeking Help for Intimate Partner Violence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Goessmann, Katharina & Ibrahim, Hawkar & Saupe, Laura Bebra & Ismail, Azad Ali & Neuner, Frank, 2019. "The contribution of mental health and gender attitudes to intimate partner violence in the context of war and displacement: Evidence from a multi-informant couple survey in Iraq," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Rachel Jewkes & Samantha Willan & Lori Heise & Laura Washington & Nwabisa Shai & Alice Kerr-Wilson & Andrew Gibbs & Erin Stern & Nicola Christofides, 2021. "Elements of the Design and Implementation of Interventions to Prevent Violence against Women and Girls Associated with Success: Reflections from the What Works to Prevent Violence against Women and Gi," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Andrew Gibbs & Kristin Dunkle & Rachel Jewkes, 2018. "Emotional and economic intimate partner violence as key drivers of depression and suicidal ideation: A cross-sectional study among young women in informal settlements in South Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Lauren Maxwell & Karen Devries & Danielle Zionts & Jeanne L Alhusen & Jacquelyn Campbell, 2015. "Estimating the Effect of Intimate Partner Violence on Women’s Use of Contraception: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-25, February.
    13. Abiodun Olusola Omotayo & Abeeb Babatunde Omotoso & Saidat Adebola Daud & Oluwadara Pelumi Omotayo & Babatunde Afeez Adeniyi, 2022. "Rising Food Prices and Farming Households Food Insecurity during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Policy Implications from SouthWest Nigeria," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Tara S. Beattie & Rhoda Kabuti & Alicja Beksinska & Hellen Babu & Mary Kung’u & The Maisha Fiti Study Champions & Pooja Shah & Emily Nyariki & Chrispo Nyamweya & Monica Okumu & Anne Mahero & Pauline N, 2023. "Violence across the Life Course and Implications for Intervention Design: Findings from the Maisha Fiti Study with Female Sex Workers in Nairobi, Kenya," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Carlos Díaz & Sebastian Fossati & Nicolás Trajtenberg, 2022. "Stay at home if you can: COVID‐19 stay‐at‐home guidelines and local crime," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 1067-1113, December.
    16. Carmen Hunzelar & Yelda Krumpholtz & Robert Schlack & Birgitta Weltermann, 2023. "More GP Consultations by Violence Victims: Results from the Representative German DEGS1 Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Cai, Ziyi & Canetto, Silvia Sara & Chang, Qingsong & Yip, Paul S.F., 2021. "Women's suicide in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: Do laws discriminating against women matter?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    18. Pilar Montesó‐Curto & Carina Aguilar & Marylène Lejeune & Lina Casadó‐Marin & Georgina Casanova Garrigós & Carme Ferré‐Grau, 2017. "Violence and depression in a community sample," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(15-16), pages 2392-2398, August.
    19. Tsai, Alexander C. & Venkataramani, Atheendar S., 2015. "Communal bereavement and resilience in the aftermath of a terrorist event: Evidence from a natural experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 155-163.
    20. Nena Kopčavar Guček & Polona Selič, 2018. "Depression in Intimate Partner Violence Victims in Slovenia: A Crippling Pattern of Factors Identified in Family Practice Attendees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13387-:d:706223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.