IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i24p13028-d699279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Perception of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinations on Social Media: Questionnaire and Sentiment Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Roe

    (School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK)

  • Madison Lowe

    (School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK)

  • Benjamin Williams

    (School of Computer Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK)

  • Clare Miller

    (School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK)

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is an ongoing concern, presenting a major threat to global health. SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccinations are no exception as misinformation began to circulate on social media early in their development. Twitter’s Application Programming Interface (API) for Python was used to collect 137,781 tweets between 1 July 2021 and 21 July 2021 using 43 search terms relating to COVID-19 vaccines. Tweets were analysed for sentiment using Microsoft Azure (a machine learning approach) and the VADER sentiment analysis model (a lexicon-based approach), where the Natural Language Processing Toolkit (NLTK) assessed whether tweets represented positive, negative or neutral opinions. The majority of tweets were found to be negative in sentiment (53,899), followed by positive (53,071) and neutral (30,811). The negative tweets displayed a higher intensity of sentiment than positive tweets. A questionnaire was distributed and analysis found that individuals with full vaccination histories were less concerned about receiving and were more likely to accept the vaccine. Overall, we determined that this sentiment-based approach is useful to establish levels of vaccine hesitancy in the general public and, alongside the questionnaire, suggests strategies to combat specific concerns and misinformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Roe & Madison Lowe & Benjamin Williams & Clare Miller, 2021. "Public Perception of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinations on Social Media: Questionnaire and Sentiment Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13028-:d:699279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13028/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/24/13028/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viju Raghupathi & Jie Ren & Wullianallur Raghupathi, 2020. "Studying Public Perception about Vaccination: A Sentiment Analysis of Tweets," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Elvira Ortiz-Sánchez & Almudena Velando-Soriano & Laura Pradas-Hernández & Keyla Vargas-Román & Jose L. Gómez-Urquiza & Guillermo A. Cañadas-De la Fuente & Luis Albendín-García, 2020. "Analysis of the Anti-Vaccine Movement in Social Networks: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-11, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Palomeque & Juan de-Lucio, 2024. "The Soundtrack of a Crisis: More Positive Music Preferences During Economic and Social Adversity," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Yankang Su & Zbigniew J. Kabala, 2023. "Public Perception of ChatGPT and Transfer Learning for Tweets Sentiment Analysis Using Wolfram Mathematica," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Nazmiye Eligüzel, 2023. "Analyzing society anti-vaccination attitudes towards COVID-19: combining latent dirichlet allocation and fuzzy association rule mining with a fuzzy cognitive map," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 669-696, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wullianallur Raghupathi & Dominik Molitor & Viju Raghupathi & Aditya Saharia, 2023. "Identifying Key Issues in Climate Change Litigation: A Machine Learning Text Analytic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-30, December.
    2. Liwei Zhang & Kelin Chen & He Jiang & Ji Zhao, 2020. "How the Health Rumor Misleads People’s Perception in a Public Health Emergency: Lessons from a Purchase Craze during the COVID-19 Outbreak in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Eva L. Jenkins & Dickson Lukose & Linda Brennan & Annika Molenaar & Tracy A. McCaffrey, 2023. "Exploring Food Waste Conversations on Social Media: A Sentiment, Emotion, and Topic Analysis of Twitter Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-26, September.
    4. McKinley, Christopher J. & Limbu, Yam, 2024. "Promoter or barrier? Assessing how social media predicts Covid-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy: A systematic review of primary series and booster vaccine investigations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    5. Samar Binkheder & Raniah N. Aldekhyyel & Alanoud AlMogbel & Nora Al-Twairesh & Nuha Alhumaid & Shahad N. Aldekhyyel & Amr A. Jamal, 2021. "Public Perceptions around mHealth Applications during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Network and Sentiment Analysis of Tweets in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Wullianallur Raghupathi & Sarah Jinhui Wu & Viju Raghupathi, 2023. "Understanding Corporate Sustainability Disclosures from the Securities Exchange Commission Filings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-32, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:24:p:13028-:d:699279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.