IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12563-d690549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationships between Physical Activity, Work Ability, Absenteeism and Presenteeism in Australian and New Zealand Adults during COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Jayden R. Hunter

    (Holsworth Research Initiative, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo 3552, Australia)

  • Rebecca M. Meiring

    (Department of Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
    Movement Physiology Research Laboratory, School of Physiology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa)

  • Ashley Cripps

    (School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle 6160, Australia)

  • Haresh T. Suppiah

    (Sport and Exercise Science, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne 3086, Australia)

  • Don Vicendese

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3086, Australia
    Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton 3053, Australia)

  • Michael I. Kingsley

    (Holsworth Research Initiative, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo 3552, Australia
    Department of Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand)

  • Brett A. Gordon

    (Holsworth Research Initiative, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo 3552, Australia)

Abstract

Public health movement and social restrictions imposed by the Australian and New Zealand governments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic influenced the working environment and may have affected health behaviours, work ability, and job performance. The aim of this study was to determine the associations between health behaviours and work ability and performance during COVID-19 restrictions and if health behaviours were related to demographic or population factors. A cross-sectional survey was used to gather responses from 433 adult employees in Australia and New Zealand between June and August 2020. The survey requested demographic information and used the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Work Ability Index, and the World Health Organisation’s Health and Work Performance Questionnaire. Multivariate regression models were used to explore relationships between the identified variables while controlling for several possible confounders. Being sufficiently physically active was associated with higher reported physical (aOR = 2.1; p = 0.001) and mental work abilities (aOR = 1.8; p = 0.007) and self-reported job performance (i.e., lower presenteeism) (median +7.42%; p = 0.03). Part-time employees were 56% less likely ( p = 0.002) to report a good or very good mental work ability. Those with existing medical conditions were 14% less likely ( p = 0.008) to be sufficiently active and 80% less likely ( p = 0.002) to report rather good or very good physical work ability. Being sufficiently active was associated with higher physical and mental work abilities and better job performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Employers should support opportunities for regular physical activity and provide specific support to individuals with medical conditions or in part-time employment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayden R. Hunter & Rebecca M. Meiring & Ashley Cripps & Haresh T. Suppiah & Don Vicendese & Michael I. Kingsley & Brett A. Gordon, 2021. "Relationships between Physical Activity, Work Ability, Absenteeism and Presenteeism in Australian and New Zealand Adults during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12563-:d:690549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12563/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12563/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rebecca M. Meiring & Silmara Gusso & Eloise McCullough & Lynley Bradnam, 2021. "The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic Movement Restrictions on Self-Reported Physical Activity and Health in New Zealand: A Cross-Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-11, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bronwyn K. Clark & Charlotte L. Brakenridge & Genevieve N. Healy, 2022. "The Importance of Research on Occupational Sedentary Behaviour and Activity Right Now," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-5, November.
    2. Fiona Niebuhr & Prem Borle & Franziska Börner-Zobel & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2022. "Healthy and Happy Working from Home? Effects of Working from Home on Employee Health and Job Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Patrick Wilms & Jan Schröder & Rüdiger Reer & Lorenz Scheit, 2022. "The Impact of “Home Office” Work on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikola Pejić & Zaharije Radivojević & Miloš Cvetavnović, 2023. "Analyzing the Impact of COVID-19 on GitHub Event Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Yu-Hsiu Chu & Yao-Chuen Li, 2022. "The Impact of Online Learning on Physical and Mental Health in University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, March.
    3. James Faulkner & Wendy J. O’Brien & Beth Stuart & Lee Stoner & John Batten & Daniel Wadsworth & Christopher D. Askew & Claire E. Badenhorst & Erin Byrd & Nick Draper & Catherine Elliot & Simon Fryer &, 2022. "Physical Activity, Mental Health and Wellbeing of Adults within and during the Easing of COVID-19 Restrictions, in the United Kingdom and New Zealand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12563-:d:690549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.