IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i22p12110-d681976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mediating Effects of Emotional Support Reception and Provision on the Relationship between Group Interaction and Psychological Well-Being: A Study of Young Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Sek-yum Ngai

    (Department of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Chau-Kiu Cheung

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Jianhong Mo

    (Department of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Spencer Yu-hong Chau

    (Department of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Elly Nga-hin Yu

    (Department of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Lin Wang

    (Department of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Hon-yin Tang

    (Department of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

While it is well-established that mutual aid groups are effective in the psychological rehabilitation of vulnerable individuals, few studies have thoroughly investigated the dynamic mechanism of how psychological well-being improves through mutual aid groups of young patients with chronic health conditions. In connection with several existing theories (i.e., the helper therapy principle, equity theory, the norm of reciprocity, and the concept of communal relationships), this study aims to: (1) evaluate whether emotional support exchanges (i.e., emotional support reception and provision) mediate the relationship between group interaction and psychological well-being; and (2) compare three potential underlying mechanisms—the mediating role of emotional support provision, equitable reciprocity (i.e., a balance of receiving and providing emotional support, where no party over-benefits or under-benefits), and sequential reciprocity (i.e., repaying the helper or a third party in the future after receiving help)—through a path analysis model. A stratified random sampling procedure with chronic health conditions as the stratifying criterion was used to recruit 391 individuals aged 12–45 years from mutual aid groups in Hong Kong, who completed both the baseline and follow-up surveys over a 12-month interval. The results of the path model revealed significant mediating roles of emotional support provision and sequential reciprocity, not equitable reciprocity. The present study offers theoretical and practical implications for promoting the psychological well-being of young patients with chronic health conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Sek-yum Ngai & Chau-Kiu Cheung & Jianhong Mo & Spencer Yu-hong Chau & Elly Nga-hin Yu & Lin Wang & Hon-yin Tang, 2021. "Mediating Effects of Emotional Support Reception and Provision on the Relationship between Group Interaction and Psychological Well-Being: A Study of Young Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:12110-:d:681976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12110/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Sek-Yum Ngai & Chau-Kiu Cheung & Yuen-Hang Ng & Liang Shang & Hon-Yin Tang & Hiu-Lam Ngai & Kenix Hok-Ching Wong, 2021. "Time Effects of Supportive Interaction and Facilitator Input Variety on Treatment Adherence of Young People with Chronic Health Conditions: A Dynamic Mechanism in Mutual Aid Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Arpana Pandit & Yoshinori Nakagawa, 2021. "How Does Reciprocal Exchange of Social Support Alleviate Individuals’ Depression in an Earthquake-Damaged Community?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lennart Reifels & Michel L. A. Dückers, 2023. "Disaster Mental Health Risk Reduction: Appraising Disaster Mental Health Research as If Risk Mattered," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Felipe Agudelo-Hernández & Nathalie Valencia Amaya & Marisol Cardona, 2023. "Suicide in a Colombian indigenous community: Beyond mental illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(8), pages 1986-1995, December.
    3. Liza Murlender & Karen Choe & Marina Ayelén Fernandez & Martin Agrest & Sara Elena Ardila-Gómez, 2024. "‘We see they are abandoned’: Social support between people discharged from long-term psychiatric hospitalizations and their neighbors in Argentina," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 70(3), pages 498-506, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:12110-:d:681976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.