IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11326-d666918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Guido Contreras-Díaz

    (Department Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Science, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain
    Department of Health, Los Lagos University, Puerto Montt 5500000, Chile)

  • Luis Javier Chirosa-Ríos

    (Department Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Science, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain)

  • Ignacio Chirosa-Ríos

    (Department Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Science, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain)

  • Leonardo Intelangelo

    (Musculoskeletal Research Group, University Center for Assistance, Teaching and Research, University of Gran Rosario, Rosario S2000, Argentina)

  • Daniel Jerez-Mayorga

    (Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Laboratory, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago 7591538, Chile)

  • Darío Martinez-Garcia

    (Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Laboratory, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago 7591538, Chile)

Abstract

Background: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the reliability of isokinetic measurements of hip strength in flexion and extension in healthy subjects and athletes. Methods: The databases used were Web of Science, SCOPUS, Medline and PubMed. R was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Hip flexion shows moderate reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.46–0.99) and good reliability in the standing position (ICC = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.54–1.04). Hip extension shows excellent reliability in the supine position (ICC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85–0.96) and moderate reliability in the standing position (ICC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.48–0.96). Flexion of 120°/s and 180°/s showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.85–1.00), (ICC = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.92–1.01). The 60°/s and 120°/s extension showed good reliability (ICC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82–0.98), (ICC = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.75–0.99). The 180°/s extension presented excellent reliability (ICC = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.82–1.03). Conclusions: The standing position shows good reliability for hip flexion and the supine position shows excellent reliability for hip extension, both movements have excellent reliability at velocities between 120°/s to 180°/s.

Suggested Citation

  • Guido Contreras-Díaz & Luis Javier Chirosa-Ríos & Ignacio Chirosa-Ríos & Leonardo Intelangelo & Daniel Jerez-Mayorga & Darío Martinez-Garcia, 2021. "Reliability of Isokinetic Hip Flexor and Extensor Strength Measurements in Healthy Subjects and Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11326-:d:666918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11326/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11326/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guido Contreras-Díaz & Luis Javier Chirosa-Ríos & Ignacio Chirosa-Ríos & Antonio Riego-Ruiz & Leonardo Intelangelo & Marcelo Tuesta-Roa & Jorge Morales-Zúñiga & Daniel Jerez-Mayorga, 2023. "Dynamometric Strength Profile of Hip Muscles in Youth Soccer Players," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11326-:d:666918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.