IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11277-d665824.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Residential Area Sociodemographic and Breast Cancer Screening Venue Location Built Environmental Features Associated with Women’s Use of Closest Venue in Greater Sydney, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Jahidur Rahman Khan

    (Australian Geospatial Health Laboratory, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia
    School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Suzanne J. Carroll

    (Australian Geospatial Health Laboratory, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia)

  • Neil T. Coffee

    (Australian Geospatial Health Laboratory, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia
    Housing and Healthy Cities Research Group, School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia)

  • Matthew Warner-Smith

    (Cancer Institute NSW, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia)

  • David Roder

    (School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
    Cancer Institute NSW, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia)

  • Mark Daniel

    (Australian Geospatial Health Laboratory, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia
    Department of Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia)

Abstract

Understanding environmental predictors of women’s use of closest breast screening venue versus other site(s) may assist optimal venue placement. This study assessed relationships between residential-area sociodemographic measures, venue location features, and women’s use of closest versus other venues. Data of 320,672 Greater Sydney screening attendees were spatially joined to residential state suburbs (SSCs) ( n = 799). SSC-level sociodemographic measures included proportions of: women speaking English at home; university-educated; full-time employed; and dwellings with motor-vehicles. A geographic information system identified each woman’s closest venue to home, and venue co-location with bus-stop, train-station, hospital, general practitioner, and shop(s). Multilevel logistic models estimated associations between environmental measures and closest venue attendance. Attendance at closest venue was 59.4%. Closest venue attendance was positively associated with SSC-level women speaking English but inversely associated with SSC-level women university-educated, full-time employed, and dwellings with motor-vehicles. Mobile venue co-location with general practitioner and shop was positively, but co-location with bus-stop and hospital was inversely associated with attendance. Attendance was positively associated with fixed venue co-location with train-station and hospital but inversely associated with venue co-location with bus-stop, general practitioner, and shop. Program planners should consider these features when optimising service locations to enhance utilisation. Some counterintuitive results necessitate additional investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jahidur Rahman Khan & Suzanne J. Carroll & Neil T. Coffee & Matthew Warner-Smith & David Roder & Mark Daniel, 2021. "Residential Area Sociodemographic and Breast Cancer Screening Venue Location Built Environmental Features Associated with Women’s Use of Closest Venue in Greater Sydney, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11277-:d:665824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vedat Verter & Sophie Lapierre, 2002. "Location of Preventive Health Care Facilities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 110(1), pages 123-132, February.
    2. Hurley, S.F. & Huggins, R.M. & Jolley, D.J. & Reading, D., 1994. "Recruitment activities and sociodemographic factors that predict attendance at a mammographic screening program," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(10), pages 1655-1658.
    3. Wang, Lu & Rosenberg, Mark & Lo, Lucia, 2008. "Ethnicity and utilization of family physicians: A case study of Mainland Chinese immigrants in Toronto, Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1410-1422, November.
    4. Navneet Vidyarthi & Onur Kuzgunkaya, 2015. "The impact of directed choice on the design of preventive healthcare facility network under congestion," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 459-474, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kucukyazici, Beste & Zhang, Yue & Ardestani-Jaafari, Amir & Song, Lijie, 2020. "Incorporating patient preferences in the design and operation of cancer screening facility networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 616-632.
    2. Kerim Dogan & Mumtaz Karatas & Ertan Yakici, 2020. "A model for locating preventive health care facilities," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(3), pages 1091-1121, September.
    3. Klein, Michael G. & Verter, Vedat & Moses, Brian G., 2020. "Designing a rural network of dialysis facilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 1088-1100.
    4. Ralf Krohn & Sven Müller & Knut Haase, 2021. "Preventive healthcare facility location planning with quality-conscious clients," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 59-87, March.
    5. Esma Akgun & Sibel A. Alumur & F. Safa Erenay, 2023. "Determining optimal COVID-19 testing center locations and capacities," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 748-769, December.
    6. B. L. Garcia & R. Bekker & R. D. Mei & N. H. Chavannes & N. D. Kruyt, 2021. "Optimal patient protocols in regional acute stroke care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 515-530, September.
    7. Kai On Wong & Osmar R Zaïane & Faith G Davis & Yutaka Yasui, 2020. "A machine learning approach to predict ethnicity using personal name and census location in Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Zeinal Hamadani, Ali & Abouei Ardakan, Mostafa & Rezvan, Taghi & Honarmandian, Mohammad Mehran, 2013. "Location-allocation problem for intra-transportation system in a big company by using meta-heuristic algorithm," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 309-317.
    9. Li, Xin & Pan, Yanchun & Jiang, Shiqiang & Huang, Qiang & Chen, Zhimin & Zhang, Mingxia & Zhang, Zuoyao, 2021. "Locate vaccination stations considering travel distance, operational cost, and work schedule," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    10. Teixeira, Joao C. & Antunes, Antonio P., 2008. "A hierarchical location model for public facility planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 92-104, February.
    11. Davari, Soheil & Kilic, Kemal & Naderi, Siamak, 2016. "A heuristic approach to solve the preventive health care problem with budget and congestion constraints," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 276(C), pages 442-453.
    12. Acar, Müge & Kaya, Onur, 2019. "A healthcare network design model with mobile hospitals for disaster preparedness: A case study for Istanbul earthquake," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 273-292.
    13. Soheil Davari & Kemal Kilic & Gurdal Ertek, 2015. "Fuzzy bi-objective preventive health care network design," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 303-317, September.
    14. Navneet Vidyarthi & Onur Kuzgunkaya, 2015. "The impact of directed choice on the design of preventive healthcare facility network under congestion," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 459-474, December.
    15. Liu, Shaonan & Kong, Nan & Parikh, Pratik & Wang, Mingzheng, 2023. "Optimal trauma care network redesign with government subsidy: A bilevel integer programming approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    16. Eric Fong & Pui Kwan Man, 2023. "Income Differences of Chinese Sub-ethnic Groups in Canada," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(2), pages 1-27, April.
    17. Vatsa, Amit Kumar & Jayaswal, Sachin, 2016. "A new formulation and Benders decomposition for the multi-period maximal covering facility location problem with server uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 404-418.
    18. Boffey, Brian & Galvao, Roberto & Espejo, Luis, 2007. "A review of congestion models in the location of facilities with immobile servers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(3), pages 643-662, May.
    19. Shi, Jianmai & Chen, Wenyi & Verter, Vedat, 2023. "The joint impact of environmental awareness and system infrastructure on e-waste collection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 760-772.
    20. Mohammadi, M. & Dehbari, S. & Vahdani, Behnam, 2014. "Design of a bi-objective reliable healthcare network with finite capacity queue under service covering uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 15-41.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11277-:d:665824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.