IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i20p10937-d658837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Physicians Renew Electronic Prescriptions in Primary Care: Therapeutic Decision or Technical Task?

Author

Listed:
  • Taina Oravainen

    (Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Marja Airaksinen

    (Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Kaija Hannula

    (Kirkkonummi Health Centre, 02400 Kirkkonummi, Finland)

  • Kirsi Kvarnström

    (Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
    HUS Pharmacy, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland)

Abstract

In long-term pharmacotherapies, the renewal of prescriptions is part of the medication use process. Although the majority of medicines are used with renewed prescriptions, little research has focused on renewal practices. The aim of this study was to explore current renewal practices from a primary care physician’s perspective to identify system-based challenges and development needs related to the renewal practices. This qualitative study was conducted in two phases in public primary health care centres of Kirkkonummi, Finland. First, five physicians were shadowed on-site while they renewed prescriptions. The findings of the shadowing phase were further discussed in two focus group discussions with seven other physicians than in the shadowing phase. Inductive content analysis was used for data analysis utilizing Reason’s risk management theory as a theoretical framework. Due to problems in the renewal process, including impractical information systems, a lack of reconciled medication lists, and a lack of time allocated for renewing prescriptions, physicians felt that monitoring and reviewing each patients’ medications for renewal was complicated. Therefore, they felt that renewing, at times, became a technical task rather than a therapeutic decision. The physicians suggested information system improvements, enhanced interprofessional cooperation, and patient involvement as strategies to ensure rational pharmacotherapy and patient safety in the renewal of prescription medicines.

Suggested Citation

  • Taina Oravainen & Marja Airaksinen & Kaija Hannula & Kirsi Kvarnström, 2021. "How Physicians Renew Electronic Prescriptions in Primary Care: Therapeutic Decision or Technical Task?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10937-:d:658837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10937/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10937/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Kallio & Tiina Eskola & Marika Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä & Marja Airaksinen, 2020. "Medication Risk Management in Routine Dispensing in Community Pharmacies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kirsi Kvarnström & Ilona Niittynen & Sonja Kallio & Carita Lindén-Lahti & Marja Airaksinen & Lotta Schepel, 2023. "Developing an In-House Comprehensive Medication Review Training Program for Clinical Pharmacists in a Finnish Hospital Pharmacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10937-:d:658837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.