IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i20p10598-d652937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological Morbidity in Endometriosis: A Couple’s Study

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Graça Pereira

    (Psychology Research Center (CIPsi), School of Psychology, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

  • Inês Ribeiro

    (School of Psychology, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

  • Hélder Ferreira

    (Department of Gynecology, Centro Materno-Infantil do Norte, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal)

  • Filipa Osório

    (Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital da Luz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
    Departament of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction Medicine, Hospital Santa Maria, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Cristina Nogueira-Silva

    (Life and Health Sciences Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
    ICVS/3B’s—PT Government Associate Laboratory, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de Braga, 4710-243 Braga, Portugal)

  • Ana C. Almeida

    (Psychology Research Center (CIPsi), School of Psychology, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological disease that impacts more than 176 million women worldwide, having a strong impact on psychological morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the contribution of psychological morbidity, in women with endometriosis, taking into consideration the duration of the couple’s relationship and the duration of the disease and also examined whether women’s sexual satisfaction had an impact on their psychological morbidity (actor effect) and on their sexual partners’ psychological morbidity (partner effect) and vice versa. Participants were 105 women and their partners, who answered the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI-4) and the Global Measure of Sexual Satisfaction (GMSEX). The results revealed a direct effect between the perception of symptom severity, marital satisfaction, and women’s psychological morbidity. Sexual activity and the presence of infertility had an indirect effect on the relationship between sexual satisfaction, diagnosis duration, and psychological morbidity, respectively. Finally, women’s sexual satisfaction had a direct effect on their own and their partner’s marital satisfaction that predicted less psychological morbidity, in both. Thus, a multidisciplinary intervention focused on the couple’s sexual and marital relationship is needed to promote psychological well-being in this population.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Graça Pereira & Inês Ribeiro & Hélder Ferreira & Filipa Osório & Cristina Nogueira-Silva & Ana C. Almeida, 2021. "Psychological Morbidity in Endometriosis: A Couple’s Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10598-:d:652937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10598/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10598/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Northouse, Laurel L. & Mood, Darlene & Templin, Thomas & Mellon, Suzanne & George, Tamara, 2000. "Couples' patterns of adjustment to colon cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 271-284, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emslie, Carol & Browne, Susan & MacLeod, Una & Rozmovits, Linda & Mitchell, Elizabeth & Ziebland, Sue, 2009. "'Getting through' not 'going under': A qualitative study of gender and spousal support after diagnosis with colorectal cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1169-1175, March.
    2. Bar-Tal, Yoram & Barnoy, Sivia & Zisser, Bracha, 2005. "Whose informational needs are considered? A comparison between cancer patients and their spouses' perceptions of their own and their partners' knowledge and informational needs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 1459-1465, April.
    3. Kay Chinonyelum Nwamaka Onyechi & Liziana N. Onuigbo & Chiedu Eseadi & Amaka B. Ikechukwu-Ilomuanya & Okechukwu Onyinye Nwaubani & Prince C.I. Umoke & Fedinand U. Agu & Mkpoikanke Sunday Otu & Anthoni, 2016. "Effects of Rational-Emotive Hospice Care Therapy on Problematic Assumptions, Death Anxiety, and Psychological Distress in a Sample of Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers in Nigeria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Astri Syse & Øystein Kravdal, 2007. "Does cancer affect the divorce rate?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 16(15), pages 469-492.
    5. Hodges, L. J. & Humphris, G. M. & Macfarlane, G., 2005. "A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between the psychological distress of cancer patients and their carers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Katrin Boström & Gerd Ahlström & Helena Sunvisson, 2006. "Being the Next of Kin of an Adult Person With Muscular Dystrophy," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 15(2), pages 86-104, May.
    7. Manderson, Lenore, 2005. "Boundary breaches: the body, sex and sexuality after stoma surgery," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 405-415, July.
    8. Liuna Geng & Jian Wang & Liping Cheng & Binbin Zhang & Hui Shen, 2019. "Mindful Learning Improves Positive Feelings of Cancer Patients’ Family Caregivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-9, January.
    9. Elaina Vivian & Hellen Oduor & Preeti Girisha & Parvez Mantry, 2021. "Mindfulness at Methodist—A Prospective Pilot Study of Mindfulness and Stress Resiliency Interventions in Patients at a Tertiary Care Medical Center," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10598-:d:652937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.