IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10513-d651131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Demand–Control Model and Pupils’ Aggressive Behaviour towards Teachers: A Follow-Up Study

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Peter Andersen

    (Danish Ramazzini Centre, Department of Occupational Medicine—University Research Clinic, Regional Hospital West Jutland, 7400 Herning, Denmark)

  • Birgit Aust

    (National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Trine Nøhr Winding

    (Danish Ramazzini Centre, Department of Occupational Medicine—University Research Clinic, Regional Hospital West Jutland, 7400 Herning, Denmark)

Abstract

Purpose: Pupils’ aggressive behaviour towards teachers is a common phenomenon in schools across different countries. The purpose of this study is to test hypotheses that are central to the Job Demand–Control model as risk factors for pupils’ aggressive behaviour towards teachers. Method: Questionnaire data were collected in 2018 and 2019 from teachers at 94 public schools in Denmark. In total, 1198 teachers participated in both rounds. Demands and social support at work were measured in 2018, and pupils’ aggressive behaviour was measured in 2019. The analyses were performed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Teachers were often exposed to pupils’ aggressive behaviour during their work. High emotional work demands and low control were associated with increased risk of pupils’ aggressive behaviour. No mitigating effect of high control was found on the association between emotional demands and risk for pupils’ aggressive behaviour towards teachers. Conclusion: High emotional demands were strongly associated with the aggressive behaviour of pupils towards teachers. Job control over own work situation was not enough to lower the risk of aggressive behaviour under conditions in which teachers experience high emotional demands. Based on these results, we recommend that supervisors carefully balance teachers’ emotional demands to their resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars Peter Andersen & Birgit Aust & Trine Nøhr Winding, 2021. "The Demand–Control Model and Pupils’ Aggressive Behaviour towards Teachers: A Follow-Up Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10513-:d:651131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10513/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10513/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicole M. Steele & Bryan Rodgers & Gerard J. Fogarty, 2020. "The Relationships of Experiencing Workplace Bullying with Mental Health, Affective Commitment, and Job Satisfaction: Application of the Job Demands Control Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lisa Auweiler & Jessica Lang & Maria Thissen & Roman Pauli, 2023. "Workplace Bullying Experience Predicts Same-Day Affective Rumination but Not Next Morning Mood: Results from a Moderated Mediation Analysis Based on a One-Week Daily Diary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Pascal Malola & Pascale Desrumaux & Eric Dose & Christine Jeoffrion, 2024. "The Impact of Workplace Bullying on Turnover Intention and Psychological Distress: The Indirect Role of Support from Supervisors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Tung-Ju Wu & Lian-Yi Wang & Jia-Ying Gao & An-Pin Wei, 2020. "Social Support and Well-Being of Chinese Special Education Teachers—An Emotional Labor Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Adolfo C. Fernández Puente & Nuria Sánchez-Sánchez, 2023. "The Impact of the Different Dimensions of Job Quality on Job Satisfaction in the Public and Private sector. What is Wrong with the Social Environment?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    5. Francisco Rodríguez-Cifuentes & Samuel Fernández-Salinero & Juan Antonio Moriano & Gabriela Topa, 2020. "Presenteeism, Overcommitment, Workplace Bullying, and Job Satisfaction: A Moderated Mediation Relationship," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Heesup Han & Bo Meng & Bee-Lia Chua & Hyungseo Bobby Ryu, 2020. "Hedonic and Utilitarian Performances as Determinants of Mental Health and Pro-Social Behaviors among Volunteer Tourists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10513-:d:651131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.