IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10372-d648584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) in a Spanish Population

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Romero-Moreno

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cádiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain
    University Institute of Research in Social Sustainable Development, University of Cadiz, 11405 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

  • Alberto Paramio

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cádiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain
    University Institute of Research in Social Sustainable Development, University of Cadiz, 11405 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

  • Serafín J. Cruces-Montes

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cádiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain
    University Institute of Research in Social Sustainable Development, University of Cadiz, 11405 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

  • Antonio Zayas

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cádiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain
    University Institute of Research in Social Sustainable Development, University of Cadiz, 11405 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

  • Diego Gómez-Carmona

    (University Institute of Research in Social Sustainable Development, University of Cadiz, 11405 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
    Department of Marketing and Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Cadiz, 11405 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

  • Ana Merchán-Clavellino

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cádiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain
    University Institute of Research in Social Sustainable Development, University of Cadiz, 11405 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

Abstract

In recent decades, the study of psychotherapy effectiveness has been one of the pillars of clinical research because of its implication for therapeutic cure. However, although many studies have focused their interest on the patient’s perception, there are no instruments oriented to the study of psychotherapists’ attributions of effectiveness: to what factors psychotherapists attribute responsibility for the cure of the therapies they provide. The present study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for assessing the attribution of the effectiveness of psychotherapy in a population of 69 psychotherapists of different theoretical orientations. After an initial process of inter-judge content validation, 12 items were selected for validation in the targeted population, adequately fulfilling the quality requirements in the validity–reliability tests, and grouped into four factors after principal component analysis. These factors were as follows: (1) therapeutic alliance enhancers; (2) psychotherapist emotional characteristics; (3) therapy-specific variables; and (4) facilitators of patient engagement with therapy. This four-factor structure also showed a good fit for the fit indices checked in confirmatory factor analysis. In summary, we can conclude that the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) developed in our research can be helpful if tested on a larger number of individuals. The results can be replicated in other populations of psychotherapists.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Romero-Moreno & Alberto Paramio & Serafín J. Cruces-Montes & Antonio Zayas & Diego Gómez-Carmona & Ana Merchán-Clavellino, 2021. "Development and Validation of the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) in a Spanish Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10372-:d:648584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10372/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10372/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    2. Brian Woodhouse & Paul Jackson, 1977. "Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of non-homogeneous items: II: A search procedure to locate the greatest lower bound," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(4), pages 579-591, December.
    3. Paul Jackson & Christian Agunwamba, 1977. "Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of non-homogeneous items: I: Algebraic lower bounds," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(4), pages 567-578, December.
    4. Ledyard Tucker & Charles Lewis, 1973. "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eunseong Cho, 2021. "Neither Cronbach’s Alpha nor McDonald’s Omega: A Commentary on Sijtsma and Pfadt," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 877-886, December.
    2. Klaas Sijtsma & Ivo Molenaar, 1987. "Reliability of test scores in nonparametric item response theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(1), pages 79-97, March.
    3. David J. Hessen, 2017. "Lower Bounds to the Reliabilities of Factor Score Estimators," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 648-659, September.
    4. Peter M. Bentler, 2016. "Covariate-free and Covariate-dependent Reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 907-920, December.
    5. Tyler Hunt & Peter Bentler, 2015. "Quantile Lower Bounds to Reliability Based on Locally Optimal Splits," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 182-195, March.
    6. William Revelle & Richard Zinbarg, 2009. "Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 145-154, March.
    7. Zhengguo Gu & Wilco H. M. Emons & Klaas Sijtsma, 2021. "Estimating Difference-Score Reliability in Pretest–Posttest Settings," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(5), pages 592-610, October.
    8. Anne-Catherine Guio & David Gordon & Eric Marlier & Hector Najera & Marco Pomati, 2018. "Towards an EU measure of child deprivation," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(3), pages 835-860, June.
    9. Dyego Carlos Souza Anacleto de Araújo & Sylmara Nayara Pereira & Willian Melo dos Santos & Pedro Wlisses dos Santos Menezes & Kérilin Stancine dos Santos Rocha & Sabrina Cerqueira-Santos & André Faro , 2021. "Brazilian version of the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension: Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation among healthcare students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, February.
    10. Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Meena Madhavan & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "The Effects of Innovation Adoption and Social Factors between Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainable Firm Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, July.
    11. Jos Berge & Gregor Sočan, 2004. "The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 613-625, December.
    12. Gary Kleinman & Dan Palmon & Picheng Lee, 2003. "The Effects of Personal and Group Level Factors on the Outcomes of Simulated Auditor and Client Teams," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 57-84, January.
    13. Brashear, Thomas G. & Brooks, Charles M. & Boles, James S., 2004. "Distributive and procedural justice in a sales force context: Scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 86-93, January.
    14. Jan Brederecke & Jennifer L Scott & Martina de Zwaan & Elmar Brähler & Frank Neuner & Michael Quinn & Tanja Zimmermann, 2020. "Psychometric properties of the German version of the Self-Image Scale (SIS-D)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Goichi Hagiwara & Kayoko Kurita & Shinichi Warisawa & Satori Hachisuka & Jim Ueda & Kensuke Ehara & Katsuhiko Ishikawa & Kosei Inoue & Daisuke Akiyama & Masakatsu Nakada & Masafumi Fujii, 2022. "Competencies That Japanese Collegiate Sports Coaches Require for Dual-Career Support for Student Athletes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    16. E. Cools & H. Van Den Broeck & D. Bouckenooghe, 2006. "The Cognitive Style Indicator: Development and validation of a new measurement instrument," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/379, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    17. Godfred O Boateng & Shalean M Collins & Patrick Mbullo & Pauline Wekesa & Maricianah Onono & Torsten B Neilands & Sera L Young, 2018. "A novel household water insecurity scale: Procedures and psychometric analysis among postpartum women in western Kenya," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-28, June.
    18. Pedersen Geir & Johansen Merete Selsbakk & Wilberg Theresa & Karterud Sigmund, 2014. "Testing Different Versions of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales in a Clinical Sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Giacomo Angelini & Ilaria Buonomo & Paula Benevene & Piermarco Consiglio & Luciano Romano & Caterina Fiorilli, 2021. "The Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): A Contribution to Italian Validation with Teachers’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Xiaoyu Yu & Yi. Chen & Bang Nguyen, 2014. "Knowledge Management, Learning Behavior from Failure and New Product Development in New Technology Ventures," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 405-423, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10372-:d:648584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.