IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10046-d642195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Air Quality Citizen-Sensors Turn into Clean Air Ambassadors? Insights from a Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Guilhem Dardier

    (EHESP, F-35000 Rennes, France
    Univ Rennes, EHESP, CNRS, ARENES—UMR 6051, F-35000 Rennes, France)

  • Françoise Jabot

    (EHESP, F-35000 Rennes, France
    Univ Rennes, EHESP, CNRS, ARENES—UMR 6051, F-35000 Rennes, France)

  • Flora Pouliquen

    (EHESP, F-35000 Rennes, France)

Abstract

While the figure of ambassador is being increasingly called upon in the field of environmental health, its scope remains fuzzy and its success factors have been little studied. This article presents the results of a qualitative study performed over three years on a French citizen-sensor scheme for air quality. The scheme draws on volunteer citizens to measure fine particles by means of micro-sensors. Volunteers are also tasked with raising awareness in their entourage about environmental issues with the aim of changing people’s behaviour. We investigated this strategy and sought to identify the conditions that enable citizens to become effective clean air ambassadors. The scheme’s intervention logic was first reconstructed and a literature review of similar projects was conducted. Then, three surveys were carried out with the scheme’s volunteers. Each survey consisted of an observation of the volunteers’ practices and individual interviews (70 in all) in order to understand these citizen-sensors motivations and experiences, and characterize how they fulfilled their role. We concluded that, for citizen sensing, the scope and role of ambassador should be reconsidered insofar as these citizens serve as peer leaders and mediators. In this respect, we try to define the success factors for citizen-sensing-based ambassadors programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Guilhem Dardier & Françoise Jabot & Flora Pouliquen, 2021. "Can Air Quality Citizen-Sensors Turn into Clean Air Ambassadors? Insights from a Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10046-:d:642195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10046/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10046/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorthios-Guilledroit, Agathe & Richard, Lucie & Filiatrault, Johanne, 2018. "Factors associated with the implementation of community-based peer-led health promotion programs: A scoping review," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 19-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert M. Portman & Andrew R. Levy & Anthony J. Maher & Stuart J. Fairclough, 2021. "Multi-Stakeholder Retrospective Acceptability of a Peer Support Intervention for Exercise Referral," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Keith James Topping, 2022. "Peer Education and Peer Counselling for Health and Well-Being: A Review of Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Soumyadeep Banerjee & Abid Hussain & Sabarnee Tuladhar & Arabinda Mishra, 2019. "Building capacities of women for climate change adaptation: Insights from migrant-sending households in Nepal," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 587-609, December.
    4. Lawarée, Justin & Jacob, Steve & Ouimet, Mathieu, 2020. "A scoping review of knowledge syntheses in the field of evaluation across four decades of practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10046-:d:642195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.