IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i17p9421-d630251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Comparison of Dengue Vulnerability Indices Using GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Lao PDR and Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Sumaira Zafar

    (Department of Environmental Engineering and Management, Asian Institute of Technology; Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Oleg Shipin

    (Department of Environmental Engineering and Management, Asian Institute of Technology; Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Richard E. Paul

    (Unité de la Génétique Fonctionnelle des Maladies Infectieuses, Institut Pasteur, CNRS UMR 2000, 75015 Paris, France)

  • Joacim Rocklöv

    (Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Ubydul Haque

    (Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, North Texas, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA)

  • Md. Siddikur Rahman

    (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
    Department of Statistics, Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur 5402, Bangladesh)

  • Mayfong Mayxay

    (Institute of Research and Education Development (IRED), University of Health Sciences, Ministry of Health, Vientiane 43130, Laos
    Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Welcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane 43130, Laos
    Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Old Road Campus, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LG, UK)

  • Chamsai Pientong

    (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

  • Sirinart Aromseree

    (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

  • Petchaboon Poolphol

    (The Office of Disease Prevention and Control Region 10(th), Ubon Ratchathani 34000, Thailand)

  • Tiengkham Pongvongsa

    (Savannakhet Provincial Health Department, Savannakhet 13000, Laos)

  • Nanthasane Vannavong

    (Champasak Provincial Health Office, Pakse 1600, Laos)

  • Hans J. Overgaard

    (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
    Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1430 Ås, Norway)

Abstract

Dengue is a continuous health burden in Laos and Thailand. We assessed and mapped dengue vulnerability in selected provinces of Laos and Thailand using multi-criteria decision approaches. An ecohealth framework was used to develop dengue vulnerability indices (DVIs) that explain links between population, social and physical environments, and health to identify exposure, susceptibility, and adaptive capacity indicators. Three DVIs were constructed using two objective approaches, Shannon’s Entropy (SE) and the Water-Associated Disease Index (WADI), and one subjective approach, the Best-Worst Method (BWM). Each DVI was validated by correlating the index score with dengue incidence for each spatial unit (district and subdistrict) over time. A Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) larger than 0.5 and a p -value less than 0.05 implied a good spatial and temporal performance. Spatially, DVI WADI was significantly correlated on average in 19% (4–40%) of districts in Laos (mean r = 0.5) and 27% (15–53%) of subdistricts in Thailand (mean r = 0.85). The DVI SE was validated in 22% (12–40%) of districts in Laos and in 13% (3–38%) of subdistricts in Thailand. The DVI BWM was only developed for Laos because of lack of data in Thailand and was significantly associated with dengue incidence on average in 14% (0–28%) of Lao districts. The DVI WADI indicated high vulnerability in urban centers and in areas with plantations and forests. In 2019, high DVI WADI values were observed in sparsely populated areas due to elevated exposure, possibly from changes in climate and land cover, including urbanization, plantations, and dam construction. Of the three indices, DVI WADI was the most suitable vulnerability index for the study area. The DVI WADI can also be applied to other water-associated diseases, such as Zika and chikungunya, to highlight priority areas for further investigation and as a tool for prevention and interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumaira Zafar & Oleg Shipin & Richard E. Paul & Joacim Rocklöv & Ubydul Haque & Md. Siddikur Rahman & Mayfong Mayxay & Chamsai Pientong & Sirinart Aromseree & Petchaboon Poolphol & Tiengkham Pongvongs, 2021. "Development and Comparison of Dengue Vulnerability Indices Using GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Lao PDR and Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-25, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9421-:d:630251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9421/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9421/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Md. Siddikur Rahman & Tipaya Ekalaksananan & Sumaira Zafar & Petchaboon Poolphol & Oleg Shipin & Ubydul Haque & Richard Paul & Joacim Rocklöv & Chamsai Pientong & Hans J. Overgaard, 2021. "Ecological, Social, and Other Environmental Determinants of Dengue Vector Abundance in Urban and Rural Areas of Northeastern Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Samir Bhatt & Peter W. Gething & Oliver J. Brady & Jane P. Messina & Andrew W. Farlow & Catherine L. Moyes & John M. Drake & John S. Brownstein & Anne G. Hoen & Osman Sankoh & Monica F. Myers & Dylan , 2013. "The global distribution and burden of dengue," Nature, Nature, vol. 496(7446), pages 504-507, April.
    3. Bin Chen & Jun Yang & Lei Luo & Zhicong Yang & Qiyong Liu, 2016. "Who Is Vulnerable to Dengue Fever? A Community Survey of the 2014 Outbreak in Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-11, July.
    4. Sokrin Khun & Lenore Manderson, 2007. "Community and School-Based Health Education for Dengue Control in Rural Cambodia: A Process Evaluation," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(3), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Éric Daudé & Sumit Mazumdar & Vandana Solanki, 2017. "Widespread fear of dengue transmission but poor practices of dengue prevention: A study in the slums of Delhi, India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Ana Maria Bedran-Martins & Maria Carmen Lemos & Arlindo Philippi, 2018. "Relationship between subjective well-being and material quality of life in face of climate vulnerability in NE Brazil," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 283-297, March.
    7. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    8. Gesler, Wil, 1986. "The uses of spatial analysis in medical geography: A review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 23(10), pages 963-973, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huong Van Nguyen & Phung Quoc Tat Than & Tu Huu Nguyen & Giang Thu Vu & Chi Linh Hoang & Tung Thanh Tran & Nu Thi Truong & Son Hoang Nguyen & Huyen Phuc Do & Giang Hai Ha & Huong Lan Thi Nguyen & Anh , 2019. "Knowledge, Attitude and Practice about Dengue Fever among Patients Experiencing the 2017 Outbreak in Vietnam," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Bertrand Lefebvre & Rojina Karki & Renaud Misslin & Kanchana Nakhapakorn & Eric Daudé & Richard E. Paul, 2022. "Importance of Public Transport Networks for Reconciling the Spatial Distribution of Dengue and the Association of Socio-Economic Factors with Dengue Risk in Bangkok, Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Jian-Wei Xu & Hui Liu & Didan Ai & Yan Yu & Bian Yu, 2019. "The Shan people’s health beliefs, knowledge and perceptions of dengue in Eastern Shan Special Region IV, Myanmar," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Emmanuelle Kumaran & Dyna Doum & Vanney Keo & Ly Sokha & BunLeng Sam & Vibol Chan & Neal Alexander & John Bradley & Marco Liverani & Didot Budi Prasetyo & Agus Rachmat & Sergio Lopes & Jeffrey Hii & L, 2018. "Dengue knowledge, attitudes and practices and their impact on community-based vector control in rural Cambodia," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Alptekin Ulutaş & Ayşe Topal & Dragan Pamučar & Željko Stević & Darjan Karabašević & Gabrijela Popović, 2022. "A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on a Novel Grey WISP and Grey BWM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    6. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Junnan Wu & Xin Liu & Dianqi Pan & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Kai Ke, 2023. "Research on Safety Evaluation of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant Based on Improved Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    9. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Ramin Bazrafshan & Fatih Ecer & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2022. "The Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability Strategy Integrated with Bayesian BWM-MARCOS Methods to Determine the Optimal Lithium Battery Plant Located in South America," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Paul, Ananna & Shukla, Nagesh & Trianni, Andrea, 2023. "Modelling supply chain sustainability challenges in the food processing sector amid the COVID-19 outbreak," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    11. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Pushparenu Bhattacharjee & Syed Abou Iltaf Hussain & V. Dey & U. K. Mandal, 2023. "Failure mode and effects analysis for submersible pump component using proportionate risk assessment model: a case study in the power plant of Agartala," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(5), pages 1778-1798, October.
    13. Dilupa Nakandala & Yung Po Tsang & Henry Lau & Carman Ka Man Lee, 2022. "An Industrial Blockchain-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Global Freight Management in Agricultural Supply Chains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Martín-García, Jaime & Gómez-Limón, José A. & Arriaza, Manuel, 2024. "Conversion to organic farming: Does it change the economic and environmental performance of fruit farms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    15. Sakirul Khan & Sheikh Mohammad Fazle Akbar & Takaaki Yahiro & Mamun Al Mahtab & Kazunori Kimitsuki & Takehiro Hashimoto & Akira Nishizono, 2022. "Dengue Infections during COVID-19 Period: Reflection of Reality or Elusive Data Due to Effect of Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, August.
    16. Zeng, Shouzhen & Zhou, Jiamin & Zhang, Chonghui & Merigó, José M., 2022. "Intuitionistic fuzzy social network hybrid MCDM model for an assessment of digital reforms of manufacturing industry in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    17. Salimi, Negin & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-155.
    18. Shengzhang Dong & George Dimopoulos, 2023. "Aedes aegypti Argonaute 2 controls arbovirus infection and host mortality," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Željko Stević & Irena Đalić & Dragan Pamučar & Zdravko Nunić & Slavko Vesković & Marko Vasiljević & Ilija Tanackov, 2019. "A new hybrid model for quality assessment of scientific conferences based on Rough BWM and SERVQUAL," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 1-30, April.
    20. Zhao, Xinxing & Li, Kainan & Ang, Candice Ke En & Cheong, Kang Hao, 2023. "A deep learning based hybrid architecture for weekly dengue incidences forecasting," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9421-:d:630251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.