IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p7928-d602153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Don’t Know” Responses for Nicotine Vaping Product Features among Adult Vapers: Findings from the 2018 and 2020 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas J. Felicione

    (Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Health Behavior, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA)

  • K. Michael Cummings

    (Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA)

  • Shannon Gravely

    (Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • David Hammond

    (School of Public Health & Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Ann McNeill

    (Department of Addictions, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
    Shaping Public Health Policies to Reduce Inequalities and Harm (SPECTRUM), Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK)

  • Ron Borland

    (School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
    Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

  • Geoffrey T. Fong

    (Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON M5G 0A3, Canada)

  • Richard J. O’Connor

    (Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Health Behavior, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA)

Abstract

Nicotine vaping products (NVPs) have evolved rapidly, and some vapers have difficulty reporting about their NVP. NVP knowledge may be important for providing accurate survey data, understanding the potential risks of NVP use, and assessing legal and regulated products. This paper examines current vapers who responded “don’t know” (DK) regarding their NVP features. Data are from adult daily/weekly vapers in Waves Two (2018, n = 4192) and Three (2020, n = 3894) of the ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. Analyses assessed DK responses for NVP features (e.g., type/appearance, nicotine) and consumption. A DK index score was computed based on the percent of all features with DK responses, which was tested for associations with demographics, smoking/vaping status, NVP features, purchase location, and knowledge of NVP relative risks. NVP description and appearance were easily identified, but DK was more common for features such as nicotine content (7.3–9.2%) and tank/cartridge volume capacity (26.6–30.0%). DK responses often differed by vaping/smoking status, NVP type/appearance, purchase location, and country. Vapers who are younger, use box-shaped NVPs, purchase online, and exclusive daily vapers were associated with lower DK index scores. Higher DK index scores were associated with poorer knowledge of relative health risks of NVP use. The diversity of the NVP market and wide variation in how products are used makes it challenging to capture information from users about device features, such as nicotine content and capacity, in population surveys.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas J. Felicione & K. Michael Cummings & Shannon Gravely & David Hammond & Ann McNeill & Ron Borland & Geoffrey T. Fong & Richard J. O’Connor, 2021. "“Don’t Know” Responses for Nicotine Vaping Product Features among Adult Vapers: Findings from the 2018 and 2020 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7928-:d:602153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monique Williams & Prue Talbot, 2019. "Design Features in Multiple Generations of Electronic Cigarette Atomizers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Cosima Hoetger & Rose S. Bono & Nicole E. Nicksic & Andrew J. Barnes & Caroline O. Cobb, 2019. "Influence of Electronic Cigarette Characteristics on Susceptibility, Perceptions, and Abuse Liability Indices among Combustible Tobacco Cigarette Smokers and Non-Smokers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.
    3. David C. Braak & K. Michael Cummings & Georges J. Nahhas & Bryan W. Heckman & Ron Borland & Geoffrey T. Fong & David Hammond & Christian Boudreau & Ann McNeill & David T. Levy & Ce Shang, 2019. "Where Do Vapers Buy Their Vaping Supplies? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) 4 Country Smoking and Vaping Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cotti, Chad & Courtemanche, Charles & Maclean, Joanna Catherine & Nesson, Erik & Pesko, Michael F. & Tefft, Nathan W., 2022. "The effects of e-cigarette taxes on e-cigarette prices and tobacco product sales: Evidence from retail panel data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Elizabeth K. Do & Kathleen Aarvig & Emily M. Donovan & Barbara A. Schillo & Donna M. Vallone & Elizabeth C. Hair, 2023. "Underage Youth Continue to Obtain E-Cigarettes from Retail Sources in 2022: Evidence from the Truth Continuous Tracking Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-7, January.
    3. Greta Hsu & Anthony C. Gamst & Yue-Lin Zhuang & Tanya Wolfson & Shu-Hong Zhu, 2019. "A Comparison of E-Cigarette Use Patterns and Smoking Cessation Behavior among Vapers by Primary Place of Purchase," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Sandra Joss & Anna Moser & Julian Jakob & Kali Tal & Jean-François Etter & Kevin Selby & Anna Schoeni & Philippe Poirson & Reto Auer, 2021. "Counseling in Vape Shops: A Survey of Vape Shop Managers in Switzerland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Charlotta Pisinger & Sofie K. Bergman Rasmussen, 2022. "The Health Effects of Real-World Dual Use of Electronic and Conventional Cigarettes versus the Health Effects of Exclusive Smoking of Conventional Cigarettes: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Evan Floyd & Toluwanimi Oni & Changjie Cai & Bilal Rehman & Jooyeon Hwang & Tyler Watson, 2022. "Validation of a High Flow Rate Puff Topography System Designed for Measurement of Sub-Ohm, Third Generation Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Shaoying Ma & Shuning Jiang & Meng Ling & Jian Chen & Ce Shang, 2022. "Price Promotions of E-Liquid Products Sold in Online Stores," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Monique Williams & Wentai Luo & Kevin McWhirter & Omeka Ikegbu & Prue Talbot, 2022. "Chemical Elements, Flavor Chemicals, and Nicotine in Unused and Used Electronic Cigarettes Aged 5–10 Years and Effects of pH," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7928-:d:602153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.