IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p7786-d599397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capturing Interactive Work for Nurses—First Validation of the German IWDS-N as a Multidimensional Measure

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Digutsch

    (Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University Dortmund, 44139 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Maria Velana

    (Department of Ergonomics, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University Dortmund, 44139 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Gerhard Rinkenauer

    (Department of Ergonomics, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University Dortmund, 44139 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Sabrina Sobieraj

    (Department of Ergonomics, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University Dortmund, 44139 Dortmund, Germany)

Abstract

The theoretical framework of interactive work provides a multi-dimensional perspective on the interpersonal demands of nurses in nurse–patient interactions. It is defined by four dimensions: emotional labor directed to the self and others, cooperative work, and subjective acting. While the framework stems from qualitative research, the aim of the current study is to translate it into a quantitative scale to enable measurement of the high interpersonal demands that so often remain implicit. For this reason, we conducted an online survey study ( N = 157; 130 women, 25 men, 2 divers) among professional nurses in Germany (spring 2021) to test the derived items and subscales concerning interactive work, which resulted in a 4-factor model that was verified with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The survey further captured additional information on established constructs concerning job-related well-being (e.g., burn out, meaningfulness), job characteristics (e.g., work interruptions, time pressure) and individual resources (coping strategies) that are supposed to correlate with interactive work demand scales for nurses (IWDS-N), to determine the quantitative nature of their relations. The results show that the subscales of the IWDS-N have adverse effects on indicators of work-related well-being. Moreover, negative job characteristics, such as time pressure, are positively correlated with subscales of the IWDS-N and are therefore problem-focused coping strategies as an individual resource. The results emphasize that a multidimensional consideration of self-regulatory processes is useful to capture the subtle and complex nature of the interactive work demands of nurses. The current study is the first that developed a quantitative, multi-dimensional measure for interactive work demands, which can help make implicit demands in service work explicit.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Digutsch & Maria Velana & Gerhard Rinkenauer & Sabrina Sobieraj, 2021. "Capturing Interactive Work for Nurses—First Validation of the German IWDS-N as a Multidimensional Measure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7786-:d:599397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7786/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7786/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joachim Gerich & Christoph Weber, 2020. "The Ambivalent Appraisal of Job Demands and the Moderating Role of Job Control and Social Support for Burnout and Job Satisfaction," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 251-280, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiziana Ramaci & Venerando Rapisarda & Diego Bellini & Nicola Mucci & Andrea De Giorgio & Massimiliano Barattucci, 2020. "Mindfulness as a Protective Factor for Dissatisfaction in HCWs: The Moderating Role of Mindful Attention between Climate Stress and Job Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Christoph Weinert & Tim Weitzel, 2023. "Teleworking in the Covid-19 Pandemic," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(3), pages 309-328, June.
    3. Sugumar Mariappanadar & Wayne A. Hochwarter, 2022. "A Three-Way Synergistic Effect of Work on Employee Well-Being: Human Sustainability Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7786-:d:599397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.