IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p7720-d598107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simplified Population-Level Landscape Model Identifying Ecological Risk Drivers of Pesticide Applications, Part One: Case Study for Large Herbivorous Mammals

Author

Listed:
  • David Tarazona

    (Independent Researcher, 28009 Madrid, Spain)

  • Guillermo Tarazona

    (PharmaMar, Colmenar Viejo, 28770 Madrid, Spain)

  • Jose V. Tarazona

    (Scientific Committee and Emerging Risks Unit, European Food Safety Authority, 43126 Parma, Italy)

Abstract

Environmental risk assessment is a key process for the authorization of pesticides, and is subjected to continuous challenges and updates. Current approaches are based on standard scenarios and independent substance-crop assessments. This arrangement does not address the complexity of agricultural ecosystems with mammals feeding on different crops. This work presents a simplified model for regulatory use addressing landscape variability, co-exposure to several pesticides, and predicting the effect on population abundance. The focus is on terrestrial vertebrates and the aim is the identification of the key risk drivers impacting on mid-term population dynamics. The model is parameterized for EU assessments according to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Guidance Document, but can be adapted to other regulatory schemes. The conceptual approach includes two modules: (a) the species population dynamics, and (b) the population impact of pesticide exposure. Population dynamics is modelled through daily survival and seasonal reproductions rates; which are modified in case of pesticide exposure. All variables, parameters, and functions can be modified. The model has been calibrated with ecological data for wild rabbits and brown hares and tested for two herbicides, glyphosate and bromoxynil, using validated toxicity data extracted from EFSA assessments. Results demonstrate that the information available for a regulatory assessment, according to current EU information requirements, is sufficient for predicting the impact and possible consequences at population dynamic levels. The model confirms that agroecological parameters play a key role when assessing the effect of pesticide exposure on population abundance. The integration of laboratory toxicity studies with this simplified landscape model allows for the identification of conditions leading to population vulnerability or resilience. An Annex includes a detailed assessment of the model characteristics according to the EFSA scheme on Good Modelling Practice.

Suggested Citation

  • David Tarazona & Guillermo Tarazona & Jose V. Tarazona, 2021. "A Simplified Population-Level Landscape Model Identifying Ecological Risk Drivers of Pesticide Applications, Part One: Case Study for Large Herbivorous Mammals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7720-:d:598107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7720/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7720/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stéphanie C. Schai-Braun & Christine Kowalczyk & Erich Klansek & Klaus Hackländer, 2019. "Estimating Sustainable Harvest Rates for European Hare ( Lepus Europaeus ) Populations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Forbes, Valery E., 2024. "The need for standardization in ecological modeling for decision support: Lessons from ecological risk assessment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7720-:d:598107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.