IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7635-d596524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Osteoporosis from Clinical Health Examination Data

Author

Listed:
  • Wen-Yu Ou Yang

    (Department of Neurology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City 11217, Taiwan)

  • Cheng-Chien Lai

    (Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City 11217, Taiwan)

  • Meng-Ting Tsou

    (Department of Family Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei City 10491, Taiwan
    Mackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Taipei City 11260, Taiwan)

  • Lee-Ching Hwang

    (Department of Family Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei City 10491, Taiwan
    Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City 252, Taiwan)

Abstract

Osteoporosis is treatable but often overlooked in clinical practice. We aimed to construct prediction models with machine learning algorithms to serve as screening tools for osteoporosis in adults over fifty years old. Additionally, we also compared the performance of newly developed models with traditional prediction models. Data were acquired from community-dwelling participants enrolled in health checkup programs at a medical center in Taiwan. A total of 3053 men and 2929 women were included. Models were constructed for men and women separately with artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and logistic regression (LoR) to predict the presence of osteoporosis. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare the performance of the models. We achieved AUROC of 0.837, 0.840, 0.843, 0.821, 0.827 in men, and 0.781, 0.807, 0.811, 0.767, 0.772 in women, for ANN, SVM, RF, KNN, and LoR models, respectively. The ANN, SVM, RF, and LoR models in men, and the ANN, SVM, and RF models in women performed significantly better than the traditional Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) model. We have demonstrated that machine learning algorithms improve the performance of screening for osteoporosis. By incorporating the models in clinical practice, patients could potentially benefit from earlier diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen-Yu Ou Yang & Cheng-Chien Lai & Meng-Ting Tsou & Lee-Ching Hwang, 2021. "Development of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Osteoporosis from Clinical Health Examination Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7635-:d:596524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7635/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7635/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kurt Benke & Geza Benke, 2018. "Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Shaanthana Subramaniam & Soelaiman Ima-Nirwana & Kok-Yong Chin, 2018. "Performance of Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool (OST) in Predicting Osteoporosis—A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Zoboroski & Torrey Wagner & Brent Langhals, 2021. "Classical and Neural Network Machine Learning to Determine the Risk of Marijuana Use," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-15, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claus Zippel & Sabine Bohnet-Joschko, 2021. "Rise of Clinical Studies in the Field of Machine Learning: A Review of Data Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Julien Issa & Raphael Olszewski & Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska, 2022. "The Effectiveness of Semi-Automated and Fully Automatic Segmentation for Inferior Alveolar Canal Localization on CBCT Scans: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Heather Behr & Annabell Suh Ho & Ellen Siobhan Mitchell & Qiuchen Yang & Laura DeLuca & Andreas Michealides, 2021. "How Do Emotions during Goal Pursuit in Weight Change over Time? Retrospective Computational Text Analysis of Goal Setting and Striving Conversations with a Coach during a Mobile Weight Loss Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Daniele Piovani & Stefanos Bonovas, 2022. "Real World—Big Data Analytics in Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-3, September.
    5. Maria Radeva & Dorothee Predel & Sven Winzler & Ulf Teichgräber & Alexander Pfeil & Ansgar Malich & Ismini Papageorgiou, 2021. "Reliability of a Risk-Factor Questionnaire for Osteoporosis: A Primary Care Survey Study with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Ground Truth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Andrea Spini & Giulia Hyeraci & Claudia Bartolini & Sandra Donnini & Pietro Rosellini & Rosa Gini & Marina Ziche & Francesco Salvo & Giuseppe Roberto, 2021. "Real-World Utilization of Target- and Immunotherapies for Lung Cancer: A Scoping Review of Studies Based on Routinely Collected Electronic Healthcare Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7635-:d:596524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.