IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i11p6150-d570191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bibliometric Evaluation of Global Tai Chi Research from 1980–2020

Author

Listed:
  • Yanwei You

    (Division of Sport Science & Physical Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    These authors have contributed equally to this work.)

  • Leizi Min

    (Division of Sport Science & Physical Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    These authors have contributed equally to this work.)

  • Meihua Tang

    (School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China)

  • Yuquan Chen

    (Institute of Medical Information/Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100020, China)

  • Xindong Ma

    (Division of Sport Science & Physical Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

While studies on the health benefits of Tai Chi have sprung up over the past four decades, few have engaged in collecting global data, estimating the developing trends, and conducting reviews from the perspective of visualization and bibliometric analysis. This study aimed to provide a summary of the global scientific outputs on Tai Chi research from 1980 to 2020, explore the frontiers, identify cooperation networks, track research trends and highlight emerging hotspots. Relevant publications were downloaded from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database between 1980 and 2020. Bibliometric visualization and comparative analysis of authors, cited authors, journals, co-cited journals, institutions, countries, references, and keywords were systematically conducted using CiteSpace software. A total of 1078 publications satisfied the search criteria, and the trend of annual related publications was generally in an upward trend, although with some fluctuations. China (503) and Harvard University (74) were the most prolific country and institution, respectively. Most of the related researches were published in the journals with a focus on sport sciences, alternative medicine, geriatrics gerontology, and rehabilitation. Our results indicated that the current concerns and difficulties of Tai Chi research are “Intervention method”, “Targeted therapy”, “Applicable population”, “Risk factors”, and “Research quality”. The frontiers and promising domains of Tai Chi exercise in the health science field are preventions and rehabilitations of “Fall risk”, “Cardiorespiratory related disease”, “Stroke”, “Parkinson’s disease”, and “Depression”, which should receive more attention in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanwei You & Leizi Min & Meihua Tang & Yuquan Chen & Xindong Ma, 2021. "Bibliometric Evaluation of Global Tai Chi Research from 1980–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:6150-:d:570191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/6150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/6150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaomei Chen, 2006. "CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(3), pages 359-377, February.
    2. Yating Zhao & Jingjing Guo & Chao Bao & Changyong Liang & Hemant K Jain, 2020. "Knowledge Graph Analysis of Human Health Research Related to Climate Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo & Salehi, Hadi & Md Yunus, Melor & Farhadi, Hadi & Fooladi, Masood & Farhadi, Maryam & Ale Ebrahim, Nader, 2013. "A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases," MPRA Paper 46898, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Mar 2013.
    4. Yan Yang & Xiang-Yuan Li & Li Gong & Yun-Liang Zhu & Yan-Lei Hao, 2014. "Tai Chi for Improvement of Motor Function, Balance and Gait in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-9, July.
    5. Juan Gonzalez & Ignacio Garijo & Alfonso Sanchez, 2020. "Organ Trafficking and Migration: A Bibliometric Analysis of an Untold Story," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Ole Ellegaard & Johan A. Wallin, 2015. "The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1809-1831, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiesi Chen & Xin Xue & Jing Xu & Jinshu Zeng & Fei Xu, 2022. "Emerging Trends and Hotspots in Tai Chi Fall Prevention: Analysis and Visualization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucy Semerjian & Kunle Okaiyeto & Mike O. Ojemaye & Temitope Cyrus Ekundayo & Aboi Igwaran & Anthony I. Okoh, 2021. "Global Systematic Mapping of Road Dust Research from 1906 to 2020: Research Gaps and Future Direction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Théodore Nikiema & Eugène C. Ezin & Sylvain Kpenavoun Chogou, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of the State of Research on Agroecology Adoption and Methods Used for Its Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Mehdi Toloo & Rouhollah Khodabandelou & Amar Oukil, 2022. "A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Fractional Programming (1965–2020)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Toshiyuki Hasumi & Mei-Shiu Chiu, 2022. "Online mathematics education as bio-eco-techno process: bibliometric analysis using co-authorship and bibliographic coupling," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4631-4654, August.
    5. Xue Xiao & Martin Skitmore & Heng Li & Bo Xia, 2019. "Mapping Knowledge in the Economic Areas of Green Building Using Scientometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Gaofeng Wang & Shuai Li & Zihao Zhang & Yanning Hou & Changhoon Shin, 2023. "A Visual Knowledge Map Analysis of Cross-Border Agri-Food Supply Chain Research Based on CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-28, July.
    7. Xiaomei Luo & Yuduo Wu & Lina Niu & Lucheng Huang, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Health Technology Research: 1990~2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Yuan Li & Wilfrid Azan, 2023. "Scientific knowledge production of blockchain: A bibliometric and lexicometric review," Post-Print hal-04180011, HAL.
    9. Shufen Pang & Mazlinawati Abdul Majid & Hadinnapola Appuhamilage Chintha Crishanthi Perera & Mohammad Saydul Islam Sarkar & Jia Ning & Weikang Zhai & Ran Guo & Yuncheng Deng & Haiwen Zhang, 2024. "A Systematic Review and Global Trends on Blue Carbon and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Study from 2012 to 2023," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-31, March.
    10. Qiong Dang & Zhongming Luo & Chuhao Ouyang & Lin Wang, 2021. "First Systematic Review on Health Communication Using the CiteSpace Software in China: Exploring Its Research Hotspots and Frontiers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Li Yan & Wang Zhiping, 2023. "Mapping the Literature on Academic Publishing: A Bibliometric Analysis on WOS," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    12. Keng Yang & Hanying Qi, 2022. "Research on Health Disparities Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-25, January.
    13. Meiqi Zhang & Fang Li & Dongyu Wang & Xiaohong Ba & Zhan Liu, 2022. "Mapping Research Trends from 20 Years of Publications in Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Yunlong Niu & Mastura Adam & Hazreena Hussein, 2022. "Connecting Urban Green Spaces with Children: A Scientometric Analysis Using CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Shu-Long Luo & Xing Shi & Feng Yang, 2024. "A Review of Data-Driven Methods in Building Retrofit and Performance Optimization: From the Perspective of Carbon Emission Reductions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-33, September.
    16. Fuzhen Liu & Kee-hung Lai & Wei Cai, 2021. "Responsible Production for Sustainability: Concept Analysis and Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    17. Siqin Wang & Mengxi Zhang & Tao Hu & Xiaokang Fu & Zhe Gao & Briana Halloran & Yan Liu, 2021. "A Bibliometric Analysis and Network Visualisation of Human Mobility Studies from 1990 to 2020: Emerging Trends and Future Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    18. Wenbing Luo & Ziyan Tian & Shihu Zhong & Qinke Lyu & Mingjun Deng, 2022. "Global Evolution of Research on Sustainable Finance from 2000 to 2021: A Bibliometric Analysis on WoS Database," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    19. Yan Han & Yuehui Liang, 2023. "Scientific Knowledge Map Study of Therapeutic Landscapes and Community Open Spaces: Visual Analysis with CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Yuhui Liao & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Child-Friendly Cities: A Cross-Database Analysis from 2000 to 2022," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:6150-:d:570191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.