IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i10p5200-d554229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weight Perception Measured by Verbal Descriptions and Visual Descriptions: Which Measurement Correlates with Weight Loss Intentions among Female Nursing Students?

Author

Listed:
  • Ruxing Wu

    (Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Nursing, Shanghai 200025, China)

  • Bingqian Zhu

    (Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Nursing, Shanghai 200025, China)

  • Rongfeng Chen

    (School of Nursing and Health Management, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China)

  • Liqun Chen

    (School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China)

  • Runan Chen

    (School of Nursing, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Daqiao Zhu

    (Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Nursing, Shanghai 200025, China
    School of Nursing, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Background: Young females tend to overestimate their weight status, which might induce unhealthy weight loss intentions and behaviours. This study aimed to examine weight perception measured by visual and verbal descriptions and its correlation with weight loss intentions among female nursing students. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 600 female nursing students from four medical colleges in Shanghai, China. The participants rated perceptions of their weight by selecting a silhouette from the female Photographic Figure Rating Scale (PFRS) and one of the following verbal descriptions: “very underweight”, “slightly underweight”, “normal”, “overweight” or “obese”. Weight loss intentions were measured using the question “How often do you want to lose weight?”. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from self-reported height and weight. Data were analysed using univariate and ordinal logistic regression analyses. Results: The accuracy of weight perceptions measured by verbal descriptions and visual descriptions was 44.50% and 55%, respectively. In females with underweight BMI ( n = 135), 88.15% and 49.63% accurately classified their weight using visual descriptions and verbal descriptions, respectively. These females were more likely to overestimate (53.83% vs. 14.50%) and less likely to underestimate (1.67% vs. 30.50%) their weight when using verbal descriptions than when using visual descriptions. For verbal descriptions, weight overestimation was associated with weight loss intentions (odds ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.25–2.60). However, for visual descriptions, the two variables were not associated. Conclusions: A mismatch occurred between weight perceptions measured by the two methods and BMI status among female nursing students. Compared with verbal descriptions, visual descriptions had higher weight perception accuracy. However, weight overestimation measured by verbal descriptions was more likely to be associated with stronger intentions to lose weight than that of visual descriptions. These findings suggest that methodological discrepancies should be taken into account when measuring weight perception in future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruxing Wu & Bingqian Zhu & Rongfeng Chen & Liqun Chen & Runan Chen & Daqiao Zhu, 2021. "Weight Perception Measured by Verbal Descriptions and Visual Descriptions: Which Measurement Correlates with Weight Loss Intentions among Female Nursing Students?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5200-:d:554229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melissa D. Olfert & Makenzie L. Barr & Camille M. Charlier & Oluremi A. Famodu & Wenjun Zhou & Anne E. Mathews & Carol Byrd-Bredbenner & Sarah E. Colby, 2018. "Self-Reported vs. Measured Height, Weight, and BMI in Young Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-9, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rasa Jankauskiene & Migle Baceviciene & Simona Pajaujiene & Dana Badau, 2019. "Are Adolescent Body Image Concerns Associated with Health-Compromising Physical Activity Behaviours?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Brena Barreto Barbosa & Lucca Nielsen & Breno Souza de Aguiar & Marcelo Antunes Failla & Larissa Fortunato Araújo & Larissa Loures Mendes & Soraia Pinheiro Machado & Antonio Augusto Ferreira Carioca, 2023. "Local Food Environment and Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods: Cross-Sectional Data from the Nutritionists’ Health Study—NutriHS," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(18), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Makenzie L. Barr & Jade McNamara, 2022. "Community-Based Participatory Research: Partnering with College Students to Develop a Tailored, Wellness-Focused Intervention for University Campuses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Timotheus B. Darikwa & Samuel O. Manda, 2020. "Spatial Co-Clustering of Cardiovascular Diseases and Select Risk Factors among Adults in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5200-:d:554229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.