IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2020i1p166-d469642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time Use Implication of Clean Cookstoves in Rural Settings in Ghana: A Time Use Study

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Kyerewaa Dwommoh Prah

    (Kintampo Health Research Centre, P. O. Box 200 Kintampo, Ghana)

  • Daniel Carrion

    (Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA)

  • Felix Boakye Oppong

    (Kintampo Health Research Centre, P. O. Box 200 Kintampo, Ghana)

  • Theresa Tawiah

    (Kintampo Health Research Centre, P. O. Box 200 Kintampo, Ghana)

  • Mohammed Nuhu Mujtaba

    (Kintampo Health Research Centre, P. O. Box 200 Kintampo, Ghana)

  • Stephaney Gyaase

    (Kintampo Health Research Centre, P. O. Box 200 Kintampo, Ghana)

  • Adolphine Kwarteng

    (Kintampo Health Research Centre, P. O. Box 200 Kintampo, Ghana)

  • Kenneth Ayuurebobi Ae-Ngibise

    (Kintampo Health Research Centre, P. O. Box 200 Kintampo, Ghana)

  • Oscar Agyei

    (Kintampo Health Research Centre, P. O. Box 200 Kintampo, Ghana)

  • Mieks Twumasi

    (Kintampo Health Research Centre, P. O. Box 200 Kintampo, Ghana)

  • Francis Agbokey

    (Kintampo Health Research Centre, P. O. Box 200 Kintampo, Ghana)

  • Kwaku Poku Asante

    (Kintampo Health Research Centre, P. O. Box 200 Kintampo, Ghana)

  • Darby W. Jack

    (Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA)

Abstract

Whilst the health benefit of using clean cookstoves and fuels is widely known, there is limited information on the non-health benefit of these stoves, especially in low-middle-income countries. This paper reports the time use implications of using clean cookstoves and fuels by comparing liquified petroleum gas (LPG), an improved biomass cookstove (BioLite), and traditional biomass cookstoves (three-stone fires) in Ghana. Using survey-based time diaries, information on all the activities undertaken by study participants during a 24-h was collected and analyzed. The findings of the study show that LPG users spent significantly less time gathering firewood compared to the users of improved cookstoves and three-stone fires. LPG users spent slightly less time per cooking episode, generally, and there was no significant difference in cooking time across the three cookstoves mostly due to stove stacking. Time spent engaging in economic activities was highest for LPG users and improved biomass cookstove users, at least when compared to three-stone fire users. In this study, we provide evidence on the time use implications of clean cookstoves, highlighting their non-health benefits and supporting efforts towards the adoption and sustained used of clean cookstoves

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Kyerewaa Dwommoh Prah & Daniel Carrion & Felix Boakye Oppong & Theresa Tawiah & Mohammed Nuhu Mujtaba & Stephaney Gyaase & Adolphine Kwarteng & Kenneth Ayuurebobi Ae-Ngibise & Oscar Agyei & Mi, 2020. "Time Use Implication of Clean Cookstoves in Rural Settings in Ghana: A Time Use Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:166-:d:469642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/166/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/166/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexis Dinno, 2015. "Nonparametric pairwise multiple comparisons in independent groups using Dunn's test," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 15(1), pages 292-300, March.
    2. Greg Seymour & Hazel Malapit & Agnes Quisumbing, 2020. "Measuring Time Use in Developing Country Agriculture: Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 169-199, July.
    3. Seymour,Greg & Malapit,Hazel Jean & Quisumbing,Agnes R., 2017. "Measuring time use in development settings," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8147, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manevska-Tasevska, Gordana & Hansson, Helena & Asmild, Mette & Surry, Yves, 2018. "Assessing the regional efficiency of Swedish agriculture under the CAP ‒ a multidirectional efficiency approach," 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary 271971, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Ying Chen & Tom Lane & Stuart McDonald, 2023. "Endogenous Network Formation in Local Public Goods: An Experimental Analysis," Discussion Papers 2023-02, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    3. Andreas Aditya Hermawan & Amin Talei & Janet Yip Cheng Leong & Mayuran Jayatharan & Hui Weng Goh & Sina Alaghmand, 2019. "Performance Assessment of a Laboratory Scale Prototype Biofiltration System in Tropical Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Dosi, Giovanni & Virgillito, Maria Enrica & Yu, Xiaodan, 2020. "The wage-productivity nexus in the world factory economy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    5. Khed, Vijayalaxmi D. & Krishna, Vijesh V., 2023. "Agency and time poverty: Linking decision-making powers and leisure time of male and female farmers of Central India," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    6. Deepti Sharma & Hema Swaminathan & Rahul Lahoti, 2024. "Does it matter who you ask for time-use data?," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2024-1, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Monica P. Lambon‐Quayefio, 2024. "Walking for water and fuelwood: Welfare implications for women and children in Ghana," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 365-397, January.
    8. Cango, Pedro & Ramos-Martín, Jesús & Falconí, Fander, 2024. "Toward food sovereignty and self-sufficiency in Latin America and the Caribbean: opportunities for agricultural complementarity," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 61(1), January.
    9. Sisi Que & Yu Huang & Kwame Awuah-Offei & Liang Wang & Songlin Liu, 2023. "Discrete Choice Experiment Consideration: A Framework for Mining Community Consultation with Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Manevska-Tasevska, Gordana & Hansson, Helena & Asmild, Mette & Surry, Yves, 2021. "Exploring the regional efficiency of the Swedish agricultural sector during the CAP reforms ‒ multi-directional efficiency analysis approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    11. Joanna F. Dipnall & Belinda J. Gabbe & Warwick J. Teague & Ben Beck, 2020. "Identifying Homogeneous Patterns of Injury in Paediatric Trauma Patients to Improve Risk-Adjusted Models of Mortality and Functional Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Chakraborty, Lekha S, 2022. "Covid19 and Fiscal Policy for Unpaid Care Economy," MPRA Paper 111925, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Annika Johanna Thies & Felicitas Schneider & Josef Efken, 2021. "The Meat We Do Not Eat. A Survey of Meat Waste in German Hospitality and Food Service Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Rim Lassoued & Janet Music & Sylvain Charlebois & Stuart J. Smyth, 2023. "Canadian Consumers’ Perceptions of Sustainability of Food Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Wollburg, Philip & Tiberti, Marco & Zezza, Alberto, 2021. "Recall length and measurement error in agricultural surveys," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    16. Stephan S. Marette & Anne-Célia Disdier & John C Beghin, 2020. "A Comparison of EU and US consumers' willingness to pay for gene-edited food: Evidence from apples," PSE Working Papers halshs-02872222, HAL.
    17. Tashara M. Leak & Felicia Setiono & Navika Gangrade & Erika Mudrak, 2019. "Youth Willingness to Purchase Whole Grain Snack Packs from New York City Corner Stores Participating in a Healthy Retail Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-12, September.
    18. Zofia Grodek-Szostak & Marcin Suder & Aneta Piechaczek & Luis Ochoa Siguencia, 2021. "Assessment and Comparison of Digital Competences in Education for Selected European Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 348-361.
    19. Madhulika Khanna & Milan Thomas, 2024. "Gendered time poverty in three developing countries: An intra‐household analysis of children's time use," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 316-342, January.
    20. Maho Nakagawa & Mathieu Lefebvre & Anne Stenger, 2022. "Long-lasting effects of incentives and social preference: A public goods experiment," Post-Print hal-03777681, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:166-:d:469642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.