Author
Listed:
- Rosângela Maria Gomes
(Department of Social Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
SUS Collaborating Centre—Technology Assessment & Excellence in Health, College of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicamentos e Assistência Farmacêutica, Departamento de Farmácia Social, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais—UFMG. Av. Presidente Antônio Carlos, 6627 Campus Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901 Brazil)
- Wallace Breno Barbosa
(Department of Social Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
SUS Collaborating Centre—Technology Assessment & Excellence in Health, College of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil)
- Brian Godman
(Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Strathclyde University, Glasgow G4 ORE, UK
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
Health Economics Centre, Liverpool University Management School, Chatham Street, Liverpool L69 7ZH, UK
School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa, South Africa)
- Juliana de Oliveira Costa
(SUS Collaborating Centre—Technology Assessment & Excellence in Health, College of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, College of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil)
- Nélio Gomes Ribeiro Junior
(SUS Collaborating Centre—Technology Assessment & Excellence in Health, College of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil)
- Charles Simão Filho
(Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil)
- Mariângela Leal Cherchiglia
(Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, College of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil)
- Francisco de Assis Acurcio
(Department of Social Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
SUS Collaborating Centre—Technology Assessment & Excellence in Health, College of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil)
- Augusto Afonso Guerra Júnior
(Department of Social Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
SUS Collaborating Centre—Technology Assessment & Excellence in Health, College of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil)
Abstract
The maintenance of patients with renal transplant typically involves two or more drugs to prevent rejection and prolong graft survival. The calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are the most commonly recommended medicines in combinations with others. While immunosuppressive treatment regimens are well established, there is insufficient long-term effectiveness data to help guide future management decisions. The study analyzes the effectiveness of treatment regimens containing CNI after renal transplantation during 16 years of follow-up with real-world data from the Brazilian National Health System (SUS). This was a retrospective study of 2318 SUS patients after renal transplantion. Patients were propensity score-matched (1:1) by sex, age, type and year of transplantation. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probabilities of survival. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate factors associated with progression to graft loss. Multivariable analysis, adjusted for diabetes mellitus and race/color, showed a greater risk of graft loss for patients using tacrolimus plus mycophenolate compared to patients treated with cyclosporine plus azathioprine. In conclusion, this Brazilian real-world study, with a long follow-up period using matched analysis for relevant clinical features and the representativeness of the sample, demonstrated improved long-term effectiveness for therapeutic regimens containing cyclosporine plus azathioprine. Consequently, we recommend that protocols and clinical guidelines for renal transplantation should consider the cyclosporine plus azathioprine regimen as a potential first line option, along with others.
Suggested Citation
Rosângela Maria Gomes & Wallace Breno Barbosa & Brian Godman & Juliana de Oliveira Costa & Nélio Gomes Ribeiro Junior & Charles Simão Filho & Mariângela Leal Cherchiglia & Francisco de Assis Acurcio &, 2020.
"Effectiveness of Maintenance Immunosuppression Therapies in a Matched-Pair Analysis Cohort of 16 Years of Renal Transplant in the Brazilian National Health System,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:6:p:1974-:d:333567
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:6:p:1974-:d:333567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.