IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i6p1893-d332536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Importance of Driver Behavior Criteria Related to Road Safety for Different Driving Cultures

Author

Listed:
  • Danish Farooq

    (Department of Transport Technology and Economics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1111 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Sarbast Moslem

    (Department of Transport Technology and Economics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1111 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Rana Faisal Tufail

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Comsats University Islamabad, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan)

  • Omid Ghorbanzadeh

    (Department of Geoinformatics, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria)

  • Szabolcs Duleba

    (Department of Transport Technology and Economics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1111 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Ahsen Maqsoom

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Comsats University Islamabad, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan)

  • Thomas Blaschke

    (Department of Geoinformatics, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria)

Abstract

Driver behavior has been considered as the most critical and uncertain criteria in the study of traffic safety issues. Driver behavior identification and categorization by using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) can overcome the uncertainty of driver behavior by capturing the ambiguity of driver thinking style. The main goal of this paper is to examine the significant driver behavior criteria that influence traffic safety for different traffic cultures such as Hungary, Turkey, Pakistan and China. The study utilized the FAHP framework to compare and quantify the driver behavior criteria designed on a three-level hierarchical structure. The FAHP procedure computed the weight factors and ranked the significant driver behavior criteria based on pairwise comparisons (PCs) of driver’s responses on the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ). The study results observed “violations” as the most significant driver behavior criteria for level 1 by all nominated regions except Hungary. While for level 2, “aggressive violations” is observed as the most significant driver behavior criteria by all regions except Turkey. Moreover, for level 3, Hungary and Turkey drivers evaluated the “drive with alcohol use” as the most significant driver behavior criteria. While Pakistan and China drivers evaluated the “fail to yield pedestrian” as the most significant driver behavior criteria. Finally, Kendall’s agreement test was performed to measure the agreement degree between observed groups for each level in a hierarchical structure. The methodology applied can be easily transferable to other study areas and our results in this study can be helpful for the drivers of each region to focus on highlighted significant driver behavior criteria to reduce fatal and seriously injured traffic accidents.

Suggested Citation

  • Danish Farooq & Sarbast Moslem & Rana Faisal Tufail & Omid Ghorbanzadeh & Szabolcs Duleba & Ahsen Maqsoom & Thomas Blaschke, 2020. "Analyzing the Importance of Driver Behavior Criteria Related to Road Safety for Different Driving Cultures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:6:p:1893-:d:332536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/6/1893/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/6/1893/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Danish Farooq & Sarbast Moslem & Szabolcs Duleba, 2019. "Evaluation of Driver Behavior Criteria for Evolution of Sustainable Traffic Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Manca, Davide & Brambilla, Sara, 2011. "A methodology based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process for the quantitative assessment of emergency preparedness and response in road tunnels," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 657-664, September.
    3. Pablo Cabrera-Barona & Omid Ghorbanzadeh, 2018. "Comparing Classic and Interval Analytical Hierarchy Process Methodologies for Measuring Area-Level Deprivation to Analyze Health Inequalities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Bakhtiar Feizizadeh & Stefan Kienberger, 2017. "Spatially explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for multicriteria-based vulnerability assessment," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(11), pages 2013-2035, November.
    5. Hiroshi Hayakawa & Paul S Fischbeck & Baruch Fischhoff, 2000. "Automobile risk perceptions and insurance-purchasing decisions in Japan and the United States," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 51-67, January.
    6. Yuangao Chen & Shuo Wang & Jianrong Yao & Yixiao Li & Shuiqing Yang, 2018. "Socially responsible supplier selection and sustainable supply chain development: A combined approach of total interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy analytic network process," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1708-1719, December.
    7. Khabat Khosravi & Ebrahim Nohani & Edris Maroufinia & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, 2016. "A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making techn," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(2), pages 947-987, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yakup Çelikbilek & Sarbast Moslem, 2023. "A grey multi criteria decision making application for analyzing the essential reasons of recurrent lane change," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 916-941, June.
    2. Waseem Alam & Haiyan Wang & Amjad Pervez & Muhammad Safdar & Arshad Jamal & Meshal Almoshaogeh & Hassan M. Al-Ahmadi, 2024. "Analysis and Prediction of Risky Driving Behaviors Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Machine Learning Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Shanchuan Yu & Yu Chen & Lang Song & Zhaoze Xuan & Yi Li, 2023. "Modelling and Mitigating Secondary Crash Risk for Serial Tunnels on Freeway via Lighting-Related Microscopic Traffic Model with Inter-Lane Dependency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-29, February.
    4. Muhammad Zahid & Yangzhou Chen & Sikandar Khan & Arshad Jamal & Muhammad Ijaz & Tufail Ahmed, 2020. "Predicting Risky and Aggressive Driving Behavior among Taxi Drivers: Do Spatio-Temporal Attributes Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Faris Tarlochan & Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim & Batool Gaben, 2022. "Understanding Traffic Accidents among Young Drivers in Qatar," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Bong Gu Kang & Byeong Soo Kim, 2023. "A Study on Cognitive Error Validation for LED In-Ground Traffic Lights Using a Digital Twin and Virtual Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hadi Jahanshahi & Zahra Alijani & Sanda Florentina Mihalache, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Transportation: A Review of Fuzzy Decision Systems and Supply Chain Serviceability," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Ke Zhang & Jae Eun Lee, 2024. "Assessing the Operational Capability of Disaster and Emergency Management Resources: Using Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Hossain, Mohammad Khalid & Meng, Qingmin, 2020. "A fine-scale spatial analytics of the assessment and mapping of buildings and population at different risk levels of urban flood," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Malik Muneeb Abid & Shehar Bano & Ashok Kumar & Muhammad Iqbal & Muhammad Laiq Ur Rahman Shahid & Ahsan Javed & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, 2022. "Trend towards Helmet Usage and the Behavior of Riders While Wearing Helmets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Samereh Pourmoradian & Ali Vandshoari & Davoud Omarzadeh & Ayyoob Sharifi & Naser Sanobuar & Seyyed Samad Hosseini, 2021. "An Integrated Approach to Assess Potential and Sustainability of Handmade Carpet Production in Different Areas of the East Azerbaijan Province of Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Mohammad Khalid Hossain & Qingmin Meng, 2020. "A Multi-Decadal Spatial Analysis of Demographic Vulnerability to Urban Flood: A Case Study of Birmingham City, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-32, November.
    7. Wei Zhang & Qianxing Zhao & Minjie Pei, 2021. "How much uncertainty does the choice of data transforming method brings to heat risk mapping? Evidence from China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 349-373, March.
    8. Subhankar Chakraborty & Sutapa Mukhopadhyay, 2019. "Assessing flood risk using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and geographical information system (GIS): application in Coochbehar district of West Bengal, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(1), pages 247-274, October.
    9. Waseem Alam & Haiyan Wang & Amjad Pervez & Muhammad Safdar & Arshad Jamal & Meshal Almoshaogeh & Hassan M. Al-Ahmadi, 2024. "Analysis and Prediction of Risky Driving Behaviors Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Machine Learning Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, May.
    10. Romulus Costache, 2019. "Flood Susceptibility Assessment by Using Bivariate Statistics and Machine Learning Models - A Useful Tool for Flood Risk Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(9), pages 3239-3256, July.
    11. Faisal AlShareef & Mohammed Aljoufie, 2020. "Identification of the Proper Criteria Set for Neighborhood Walkability Using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Model: A Case Study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Lixiang Wang & Weian Li & Lujun Qi, 2020. "Stakeholder Pressures and Corporate Environmental Strategies: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Andrei C. Holman & Simona A. Popușoi, 2020. "How You Deal with Your Emotions Is How You Drive. Emotion Regulation Strategies, Traffic Offenses, and the Mediating Role of Driving Styles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, June.
    14. Min Zhou & Xianyi Long & Kannan Govindan, 2024. "Unveiling the value of institutional pressure in socially sustainable supply chain management: The role of top management support for social initiatives and organisational culture," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2629-2648, July.
    15. Sarbast Moslem & Muhammet Gul & Danish Farooq & Erkan Celik & Omid Ghorbanzadeh & Thomas Blaschke, 2020. "An Integrated Approach of Best-Worst Method (BWM) and Triangular Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating Driver Behavior Factors Related to Road Safety," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Mathivathanan, Deepak & Mathiyazhagan, K. & Khorana, Sangeeta & Rana, Nripendra P. & Arora, Bimal, 2022. "Drivers of circular economy for small and medium enterprises: Case study on the Indian state of Tamil Nadu," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 997-1015.
    17. de Castro-Pardo, Mónica & Pérez-Rodríguez, Fernando & Martín-Martín, José María & Azevedo, João C., 2019. "Modelling stakeholders’ preferences to pinpoint conflicts in the planning of transboundary protected areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    18. Showmitra Kumar Sarkar & Saifullah Bin Ansar & Khondaker Mohammed Mohiuddin Ekram & Mehedi Hasan Khan & Swapan Talukdar & Mohd Waseem Naikoo & Abu Reza Towfiqul Islam & Atiqur Rahman & Amir Mosavi, 2022. "Developing Robust Flood Susceptibility Model with Small Numbers of Parameters in Highly Fertile Regions of Northwest Bangladesh for Sustainable Flood and Agriculture Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Li, Xia & Xiao, Yuewen & Zhao, Xiaodong & Ma, Xinwei & Wang, Xintong, 2023. "Modeling mixed traffic flows of human-driving vehicles and connected and autonomous vehicles considering human drivers’ cognitive characteristics and driving behavior interaction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).
    20. Chang, Yu-Hern & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2016. "Managing corporate social responsibility strategies of airports: The case of Taiwan’s Taoyuan International Airport Corporation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 338-348.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:6:p:1893-:d:332536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.