IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1410-d323686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Performance of Land Consolidation Projects in Different Modes: A Case Study in Jianghan Plain of Hubei Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Yang

    (Department of Land Resource Management, School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), 388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Zhanqi Wang

    (Department of Land Resource Management, School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), 388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Xiaowei Yao

    (Department of Land Resource Management, School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), 388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Ji Chai

    (Department of Land Resource Management, School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), 388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Land consolidation is essential in China for improving land use efficiency and supporting rural public space governance. Previously, the implementation of land consolidation projects (LCPs) had been mainly led by governments in China. In recent years, the Chinese government vigorously promoted land consolidation, and land consolidation in the corporation-leading mode (CLM) has emerged. This study focused on investigating the performance of CLM projects and the difference in performance levels between the CLM projects and the government-leading mode (GLM) projects. Based on the improved extensible matter–element model, the performance levels of 14 LCPs in GLM and CLM of Jianghan Plain, Hubei Province and related impact factors were analyzed. A set of evaluation indices was selected based on the “process-based thinking and logic”. Results showed that: (1) performance levels of the 14 LCPs are different, most of the projects in the GLM have ordinary or poor performance, while most of the projects in the CLM have excellent or good performance; (2) factors affecting the performance levels of LCPs are also different in the two modes. The main influencing factors in the CLM were the poor access to field roads, insufficient shelterbelt planting, and low land reclamation efficiency, while the insufficient shelterbelt planting, low annual output value of farmland and grain production capacity, low increase rate of agricultural labor production, and low land reclamation efficiency were the main influencing factors in the GLM; (3) comparative analysis of the two modes revealed that LCPs in the CLM have clear investment directions, high output benefits, and obvious advantages in the development of modern agriculture when compared with the GLM. To achieve improving the performance levels of LCPs, policy makers should actively innovate the implementation mode of LCPs and encourage all kinds of agricultural corporations to participate in land consolidation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Yang & Zhanqi Wang & Xiaowei Yao & Ji Chai, 2020. "Assessing the Performance of Land Consolidation Projects in Different Modes: A Case Study in Jianghan Plain of Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1410-:d:323686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1410/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1410/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenxiong Wang & Lihong Yu & Wei Zhou & David W. Marcouiller & Bin Luo, 2018. "Estimating the mechanism of farmers’ effective participation in Chinese rural land consolidation," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 100-124, July.
    2. Gonzalez, X. P. & Alvarez, C. J. & Crecente, R., 2004. "Evaluation of land distributions with joint regard to plot size and shape," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 31-43, October.
    3. Sikor, Thomas & Müller, Daniel & Stahl, Johannes, 2009. "Land Fragmentation and Cropland Abandonment in Albania: Implications for the Roles of State and Community in Post-Socialist Land Consolidation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1411-1423, August.
    4. Zuo Zhang & Min Zhou & Guoliang Ou & Shukui Tan & Yan Song & Lu Zhang & Xin Nie, 2019. "Land Suitability Evaluation and an Interval Stochastic Fuzzy Programming-Based Optimization Model for Land-Use Planning and Environmental Policy Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Qiuqin Zhang & Tianzhu Zhang, 2018. "Land Consolidation Design Based on an Evaluation of Ecological Sensitivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Yiyi Chen & Mark Stephens & Colin A. Jones, 2019. "Does Residents’ Satisfaction with the Neighbourhood Environment Relate to Residents’ Self-Rated Health? Evidence from Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Ji Chai & Zhanqi Wang & Hongwei Zhang, 2017. "Integrated Evaluation of Coupling Coordination for Land Use Change and Ecological Security: A Case Study in Wuhan City of Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Jin, Gui & Chen, Kun & Wang, Pei & Guo, Baishu & Dong, Yin & Yang, Jun, 2019. "Trade-offs in land-use competition and sustainable land development in the North China Plain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 36-46.
    9. Fu Chen & Man Yu & Fengwu Zhu & Chunzhu Shen & Shaoliang Zhang & Yongjun Yang, 2018. "Rethinking Rural Transformation Caused by Comprehensive Land Consolidation: Insight from Program of Whole Village Restructuring in Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Allahyari, Mohammad Sadegh & Damalas, Christos A. & Masouleh, Zahra Daghighi & Ghorbani, Mehrdad, 2018. "RETRACTED: Land consolidation success in paddy fields of northern Iran: An assessment based on farmers’ satisfaction," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 95-101.
    11. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Pierre Damien Ntihinyurwa & Walter Timo de Vries & Edith Ishimwe Ngenzi, 2019. "Why Tenure Responsive Land-Use Planning Matters: Insights for Land Use Consolidation for Food Security in Rwanda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    12. Qu, Yanbo & Jiang, Guang-hui & Li, Zitong & Tian, Yaya & Wei, Shuwen, 2019. "Understanding rural land use transition and regional consolidation implications in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 742-753.
    13. David Donnelly & Rachel C. Helliwell & Linda May & Brian McCreadie, 2020. "An Assessment of the Performance of the PLUS+ Tool in Supporting the Evaluation of Water Framework Directive Compliance in Scottish Standing Waters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Yang & Li, Yamei & Xu, Chenchen, 2020. "Land consolidation and rural revitalization in China: Mechanisms and paths," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Yan Sun & Xiaojun Song & Jing Ma & Haochen Yu & Xiaoping Ge & Gang-Jun Liu & Fu Chen, 2021. "Assessing the Effectiveness for Achieving Policy Objectives of Land Consolidation in China: Evidence from Project Practices in Jiangsu Province from 2001 to 2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Zhang, Zuo & Li, Jiaming, 2022. "Spatial suitability and multi-scenarios for land use: Simulation and policy insights from the production-living-ecological perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Lili Zhang & Baoqing Hu & Ze Zhang & Gaodou Liang & Simin Huang, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological-Economic Value of Guangxi Based on Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Grzegorz Oleniacz, 2021. "Czekanowski’s Diagram and Spatial Data Cluster Analysis for Planning Sustainable Development of Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Xiaoyu Chen & Qingming Zhan & Yuli Fan, 2023. "Classification and Evaluation Methods for Optimization of Land Use Efficiency at Village Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Jacek Rapiński & Monika Siejka & Przemysław Leń & Anna Małek, 2023. "Potential of an Area in Terms of Pro-Climate Solutions in a Land Consolidation Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    8. Janus, Jaroslaw & Markuszewska, Iwona, 2019. "Forty years later: Assessment of the long-lasting effectiveness of land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 22-31.
    9. Guo, Beibei & Fang, Yelin & Jin, Xiaobin & zhou, Yinkang, 2020. "Monitoring the effects of land consolidation on the ecological environmental quality based on remote sensing: A case study of Chaohu Lake Basin, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Wei Cao & Shenglu Zhou & Minyu Zhou, 2021. "Operational Pattern of Urban-Rural Integration Regulated by Land Use in Metropolitan Fringe of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, May.
    11. Ganjar Kurnia & Iwan Setiawan & Ahmad C. Tridakusumah & Gani Jaelani & Mahra A. Heryanto & Adi Nugraha, 2022. "Local Wisdom for Ensuring Agriculture Sustainability: A Case from Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    12. Qiqi Yin & Shenglu Zhou & Chengxiang Lv & Yang Zhang & Xueyan Sui & Xiaorui Wang, 2022. "Comprehensive Land Consolidation as a Tool to Promote Rural Restructuring in China: Theoretical Framework and Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Wang, Xiaobing & Yu, Xiaohua, 2011. "Scale Effects, Technical Efficiency and Land Lease in China," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 115736, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Latruffe, Laure & Piet, Laurent, 2013. "Does land fragmentation affect farm performance? A case study from Brittany," Factor Markets Working Papers 151, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    15. Jia, Lili, 2012. "Land fragmentation and off-farm labor supply in China," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 66, number 66, September.
    16. Wójcik - Leń, Justyna & Postek, Paweł & Stręk, Żanna & Leń, Przemysław, 2020. "Proposed algorithm for the identification of land for consolidation with regard to spatial variability of soil quality," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Juan Xu & Mengsheng Yang & Ziliang Lu & Dan Liu & Yan Wu, 2021. "Quality Analysis on Spatial Planning Pattern of Rural Area in Southern Shaanxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    18. Changchang Liu & Chuxiong Deng & Zhongwu Li & Yaojun Liu & Shuyuan Wang, 2022. "Optimization of Spatial Pattern of Land Use: Progress, Frontiers, and Prospects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-22, May.
    19. Zhang, Hong & Jin, Gui & Zhang, Zhengyu, 2021. "Coupling system of carbon emission and social economy: A review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Minjuan Lv & Zhiting Chen & Lingling Yao & Xiaohu Dang & Peng Li & Xiaoshu Cao, 2022. "Potential Zoning of Construction Land Consolidation in the Loess Plateau Based on the Evolution of Human–Land Relationship," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1410-:d:323686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.