IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1312-d322098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Molecular Diversity of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli from Foods of Animal Origin and Human Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Ángel Alegría

    (Department of Food Hygiene and Food Technology, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad de León, ES24071 León, Spain)

  • Marta Arias-Temprano

    (Department of Clinical Microbiology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León (CAULE), ES24071 León, Spain)

  • Isabel Fernández-Natal

    (Department of Clinical Microbiology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León (CAULE), ES24071 León, Spain)

  • Jose M. Rodríguez-Calleja

    (Department of Food Hygiene and Food Technology, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad de León, ES24071 León, Spain)

  • María-Luisa García-López

    (Department of Food Hygiene and Food Technology, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad de León, ES24071 León, Spain)

  • Jesús A. Santos

    (Department of Food Hygiene and Food Technology, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad de León, ES24071 León, Spain)

Abstract

Dissemination of enterobacteria that produce extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) throughout the food chain has become an important health concern. This work aimed to evaluate the occurrence of ESBL-producing bacteria in foods of animal origin and to investigate the similarities between food and human isolates. The presence of beta-lactam-resistant Enterobacteriaceae was analyzed in 108 food samples, isolating 10 strains of Escherichia coli , one strain of Citrobacter freundi , and one of Hafnia alvei. E. coli isolates were compared to a group of 15 strains isolated from human patients by antibiotic susceptibility testing, characterization of ESBL genes ( bla TEM , bla CTX ,), multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Nineteen (14 clinical and five food) isolates carried bla CTX , 14 (six clinical and eight food) carried bla TEM , and three (one clinical and two food) carried bla SHV gen. MLST analysis revealed the prevalence of ST131 among the clinical strains, which grouped together in a PFGE cluster. Food isolates showed higher diversity and two of them (ST57) grouped with clinical strains, whereas another two belonged to clonal groups with virulence potential (ST59). In conclusion, the results showed that foods of animal origin must be regarded as a reservoir of ESBL-producing bacteria of clinical relevance, which might spread through the food chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Ángel Alegría & Marta Arias-Temprano & Isabel Fernández-Natal & Jose M. Rodríguez-Calleja & María-Luisa García-López & Jesús A. Santos, 2020. "Molecular Diversity of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli from Foods of Animal Origin and Human Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1312-:d:322098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1312/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1312/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Ojer-Usoz & David González & Ana Isabel Vitas, 2017. "Clonal Diversity of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from Environmental, Human and Food Samples," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lara Pérez-Etayo & Melibea Berzosa & David González & Ana Isabel Vitas, 2018. "Prevalence of Integrons and Insertion Sequences in ESBL-Producing E. coli Isolated from Different Sources in Navarra, Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1312-:d:322098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.