IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i2p455-d307259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Objective and Subjective Dementia Caregiving Burden: The Moderating Role of Immanent Justice Reasoning and Social Support

Author

Listed:
  • Yanchun Cao

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Fan Yang

    (School of International and Public Affairs, China Institute for Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

Abstract

Caregiving burden significantly effects the physical and mental health of family dementia caregivers. While the association between objective caregiving burden (OCB) and subjective caregiving burden (SCB) of family dementia caregivers is well documented, little is known as with how the association is moderated by the configuration of intrapersonal resource (e.g., immanent justice reasoning) and interpersonal resource (e.g., social support). The present study collected cross-sectional data on 157 major family caregivers of non-institutionalized persons with dementia in an urbanizing region of Western China’s Sichuan Province. They responded to questions on daily time spent on caregiving, the short version of Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), a sub-scale of a caregiver meaning scale, Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and demographic questions. Controlling for the demographic variables of the caregivers, this study found that the objective and subjective dementia caregiving burden were significantly associated ( p < 0.001), and immanent justice reasoning was positively correlated with subjective burden ( p < 0.01). Moreover, the association between OCB and SCB was significantly positive when social support and immanent justice reasoning were both high ( p < 0.001), but neutral when social support was high and immanent justice reasoning was low. The association between OCB and SCB was significantly positive when social support and immanent justice reasoning were both low ( p < 0.05), but neutral when social support was low and immanent justice reasoning was high. This research suggests the importance of developing intervention programs that consider the configuration of the external supporting resources and internal meaning-making of caregiving of the family dementia caregivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanchun Cao & Fan Yang, 2020. "Objective and Subjective Dementia Caregiving Burden: The Moderating Role of Immanent Justice Reasoning and Social Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:455-:d:307259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/455/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/455/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen‐Jiuan Yen & Wei‐Fen Ma & Ying‐Chi Lu & Ting Chang & Sheuan Lee, 2011. "The development and testing of a scale of Taiwanese caregiver meaning," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(15‐16), pages 2355-2361, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sally C. Duplantier & Francesca A. Williamson, 2023. "Barriers and Facilitators of Health and Well-Being in Informal Caregivers of Dementia Patients: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Pablo Ruisoto & Marina Ramírez & Belén Paladines-Costa & Silvia Vaca & Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez, 2020. "Predicting Caregiver Burden in Informal Caregivers for the Elderly in Ecuador," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-10, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:455-:d:307259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.