IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i2p398-d306180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Knowledge that Alcohol Can Cause Cancer is Associated with Consumer Support for Alcohol Policies: Findings from a Real-World Alcohol Labelling Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ashini Weerasinghe

    (Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON M5G 1V2, Canada)

  • Nour Schoueri-Mychasiw

    (Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON M5G 1V2, Canada)

  • Kate Vallance

    (Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 2Y2, Canada)

  • Tim Stockwell

    (Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 2Y2, Canada)

  • David Hammond

    (School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Jonathan McGavock

    (Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P4, Canada)

  • Thomas K. Greenfield

    (Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA)

  • Catherine Paradis

    (Canadian Centre for Substance Use and Addiction, Ottawa, ON K1P 5E7, Canada)

  • Erin Hobin

    (Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON M5G 1V2, Canada)

Abstract

Knowledge that alcohol can cause cancer is low in Canada. Alcohol labels are one strategy for communicating alcohol-related harms, including cancer. Extending existing research observing an association between knowledge of the alcohol–cancer link and support for alcohol policies, this study examined whether increases in individual-level knowledge that alcohol is a carcinogen following an alcohol labelling intervention are associated with support for alcohol polices. Cancer warning labels were applied to alcohol containers at the intervention site, and the comparison site did not apply cancer labels. Pre-post surveys were conducted among liquor store patrons at both sites before and two-and six-months after the intervention was stopped due to alcohol industry interference. Limiting the data to participants that completed surveys both before and two-months after the cancer label stopped, logistic regression was used to examine the association between increases in knowledge and support for policies. Support for pricing and availability policies was low overall; however, increases in individual-level knowledge of the alcohol-cancer link was associated with higher levels of support for pricing policies, specifically, setting a minimum unit price per standard drink of alcohol (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.11–3.12). Improving knowledge that alcohol can cause cancer using labels may increase support for alcohol policies. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/16320

Suggested Citation

  • Ashini Weerasinghe & Nour Schoueri-Mychasiw & Kate Vallance & Tim Stockwell & David Hammond & Jonathan McGavock & Thomas K. Greenfield & Catherine Paradis & Erin Hobin, 2020. "Improving Knowledge that Alcohol Can Cause Cancer is Associated with Consumer Support for Alcohol Policies: Findings from a Real-World Alcohol Labelling Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:398-:d:306180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/398/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/398/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stockwell, T. & Zhao, J. & Martin, G. & Macdonald, S. & Vallance, K. & Treno, A. & Ponicki, W. & Tu, A. & Buxton, J., 2013. "Minimum alcohol prices and outlet densities in British Columbia, Canada: Estimated impacts on alcohol-attributable hospital admissions," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(11), pages 2014-2020.
    2. Pechey, Rachel & Burge, Peter & Mentzakis, Emmanouil & Suhrcke, Marc & Marteau, Theresa M., 2014. "Public acceptability of population-level interventions to reduce alcohol consumption: A discrete choice experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 104-109.
    3. Petra S Meier & John Holmes & Colin Angus & Abdallah K Ally & Yang Meng & Alan Brennan, 2016. "Estimated Effects of Different Alcohol Taxation and Price Policies on Health Inequalities: A Mathematical Modelling Study," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, February.
    4. Li, Jessica & Lovatt, Melanie & Eadie, Douglas & Dobbie, Fiona & Meier, Petra & Holmes, John & Hastings, Gerard & MacKintosh, Anne Marie, 2017. "Public attitudes towards alcohol control policies in Scotland and England: Results from a mixed-methods study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 177-189.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gloria Thomasia Dossou & Morgane Guillou-Landreat & Loic Lemain & Sophie Lacoste-Badie & Nathan Critchlow & Karine Gallopel-Morvan, 2023. "How Do Young Adult Drinkers React to Varied Alcohol Warning Formats and Contents? An Exploratory Study in France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Charles D. H. Parry & Niamh Fitzgerald, 2020. "Special Issue: Alcohol Policy and Public Health—Contributing to the Global Debate on Accelerating Action on Alcohol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-7, May.
    3. Norman Giesbrecht & Emilene Reisdorfer & Isabelle Rios, 2022. "Alcohol Health Warning Labels: A Rapid Review with Action Recommendations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Maria Neufeld & Carina Ferreira-Borges & Jürgen Rehm, 2020. "Implementing Health Warnings on Alcoholic Beverages: On the Leading Role of Countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Alexandra Budenz & Richard P. Moser & Raimee Eck & Tanya Agurs-Collins & Timothy S. McNeel & William M. P. Klein & David Berrigan, 2022. "Awareness of Alcohol and Cancer Risk and the California Proposition 65 Warning Sign Updates: A Natural Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reynolds, J.P. & Archer, S. & Pilling, M. & Kenny, M. & Hollands, G.J. & Marteau, T.M., 2019. "Public acceptability of nudging and taxing to reduce consumption of alcohol, tobacco, and food: A population-based survey experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Reynolds, J.P. & Pilling, M. & Marteau, T.M., 2018. "Communicating quantitative evidence of policy effectiveness and support for the policy: Three experimental studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Irena Palamani Xhurxhi, 2020. "The early impact of Scotland's minimum unit pricing policy on alcohol prices and sales," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(12), pages 1637-1656, December.
    4. Carolin Kilian & Jakob Manthey & Jacek Moskalewicz & Janusz Sieroslawski & Jürgen Rehm, 2019. "How Attitudes toward Alcohol Policies Differ across European Countries: Evidence from the Standardized European Alcohol Survey (SEAS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Lan Nguyen & Hans De Steur, 2021. "Public Acceptability of Policy Interventions to Reduce Sugary Drink Consumption in Urban Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Richard Cookson & Owen Cotton-Barrett & Matthew Adler & Miqdad Asaria & Toby Ord, 2016. "Years of good life based on income and health: Re-engineering cost-benefit analysis to examine policy impacts on wellbeing and distributive justice," Working Papers 132cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    7. Li, Jessica & Lovatt, Melanie & Eadie, Douglas & Dobbie, Fiona & Meier, Petra & Holmes, John & Hastings, Gerard & MacKintosh, Anne Marie, 2017. "Public attitudes towards alcohol control policies in Scotland and England: Results from a mixed-methods study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 177-189.
    8. Colin Angus & John Holmes & Ravi Maheswaran & Mark A. Green & Petra Meier & Alan Brennan, 2017. "Mapping Patterns and Trends in the Spatial Availability of Alcohol Using Low-Level Geographic Data: A Case Study in England 2003–2013," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Dragos C Petrescu & Gareth J Hollands & Dominique-Laurent Couturier & Yin-Lam Ng & Theresa M Marteau, 2016. "Public Acceptability in the UK and USA of Nudging to Reduce Obesity: The Example of Reducing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Consumption," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Ismaël Rafaï & Arthur Ribaillier & Dorian Jullien, 2021. "The impact on nudge acceptability judgments of framing and consultation of the targeted population," Working Papers hal-03228638, HAL.
    11. Martha Bicket & Robin Vanner, 2016. "Designing Policy Mixes for Resource Efficiency: The Role of Public Acceptability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Vikas Soekhai & Esther W. Bekker-Grob & Alan R. Ellis & Caroline M. Vass, 2019. "Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 201-226, February.
    13. Elena Gervilla & Zara Quigg & Mariàngels Duch & Montse Juan & Clarisse Guimarães, 2020. "Adolescents’ Alcohol Use in Botellon and Attitudes towards Alcohol Use and Prevention Policies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-10, May.
    14. Clare Beeston & Mark Robinson & Lucie Giles & Elinor Dickie & Jane Ford & Megan MacPherson & Rachel McAdams & Ruth Mellor & Deborah Shipton & Neil Craig, 2020. "Evaluation of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol: A Mixed Method Natural Experiment in Scotland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    15. Andrea Pastor & Irene Molina de la Fuente & María Sandín Vázquez & Paloma Conde & Marina Bosque-Prous & Manuel Franco & Niamh Shortt & Xisca Sureda, 2020. "Availability, Promotion, and Signs of Alcohol Consumption: A Mixed Methods Study of Perceived Exposure and Objective Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, November.
    16. David A. J. Meester & Stephane Hess & John Buckell & Thomas O. Hancock, 2023. "Can decision field theory enhance our understanding of health‐based choices? Evidence from risky health behaviors," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(8), pages 1710-1732, August.
    17. Anurag Sharma & Brian Vandenberg, 2019. "Heterogenous wealth effects of minimum unit price on purchase of alcohol: Evidence using scanner data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Singh, Renu, 2023. "Priming COVID-19's consequences can increase support for investments in public health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    19. Alanna Chu & Michael Chaiton & Pamela Kaufman & Renee D. Goodwin & Jodie Lin & Chandni Hindocha & Samantha Goodman & David Hammond, 2023. "Co-Use, Simultaneous Use, and Mixing of Cannabis and Tobacco: A Cross-National Comparison of Canada and the US by Cannabis Administration Type," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-11, February.
    20. Arthur Ribaillier & Ismaël Rafaï & Dorian Jullien, 2021. "The Impact on Acceptability Judgments about Nudges of Framing and Consultation with the Targeted Population," GREDEG Working Papers 2021-12, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:398-:d:306180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.