IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i24p9453-d463629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study

Author

Listed:
  • José Vicente Ríos-Santos

    (Advanced Periodontics, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Sevilla, C/Avicena S/N, 41009 Seville, Spain)

  • Gregorio Tello-González

    (Advanced Periodontics, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Sevilla, C/Avicena S/N, 41009 Seville, Spain)

  • Pedro Lázaro-Calvo

    (Advanced Periodontics, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Sevilla, C/Avicena S/N, 41009 Seville, Spain)

  • Francisco Javier Gil Mur

    (Technological Health Research Center, Biomaterials of the Faculties of Medicine and Dentistry, International University of Cataluña, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Blanca Ríos-Carrasco

    (Advanced Periodontics, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Sevilla, C/Avicena S/N, 41009 Seville, Spain)

  • Ana Fernández-Palacín

    (Department of Biostatistic, Dental School, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Mariano Herrero-Climent

    (Porto Dental Institute, 4150-518 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Aim : (PRIMARY) Assess the changes in bone level (6 and 12 months after implant placement) between the test (definitive abutment (DEF)) and control (healing abutment (HEA)) groups. (SECONDARY) Assess the changes in bone level (6 and 12 months after implant placement) between the 1 mm high abutment group and 2 mm abutment group. Evaluate changes in implant stability recorded with analysis of the resonance frequency (RFA) Osstell system, at 6 and 12 months after implant placement, between the control group (HEA) and test (DEF). For the DEF group, the abutment was placed at the time of the surgery and was never removed. For the HEA group, the abutment was removed three times during the manufacture of the crowns. The abutments used were 1 mm high (Subgroup A) and 2 mm high (Subgroup B). Materials and methods: A total of 147 patients were selected between 54.82 ± 11.92 years old. After implant placement, patients were randomly distributed in the DEF and HEA group. After the implant placement, a periapical radiograph was taken to assess the peri-implant bone level; the same procedure was carried out 6 and 12 months post-placement. To compare the qualitative variables between the groups (HEA/DEF), the Chi-square test was used; for quantitative (MANOVA). Results : After a year, the accumulated bone loss was 0.48 ± 0.71 mm for the HEA group and 0.36 ± 0.79 mm for the DEF group, without statistical significance. Differences were only found due to timing (time) between 0 and 6 months (=0.001) and 0 and 12 months (0.001), with no differences attributable to the study groups (DEF and HEA). The accumulated bone loss (1 year) was 0.45 ± 0.78 mm for the 1 mm abutment group and 0.41 ± 0.70 mm for the 2 mm abutment group ( p = 0.02). No differences were observed in implant stability between groups. Conclusions : The “One Abutment—One Time” concept does not reduce peri-implant bone loss compared to the connection–disconnection technique. The height of the abutment does influence bone loss: the higher the abutment, the lower the bone loss.

Suggested Citation

  • José Vicente Ríos-Santos & Gregorio Tello-González & Pedro Lázaro-Calvo & Francisco Javier Gil Mur & Blanca Ríos-Carrasco & Ana Fernández-Palacín & Mariano Herrero-Climent, 2020. "One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9453-:d:463629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9453/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9453/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen María Díaz-Castro & Pedro Lázaro Calvo & Francisco Javier Gil & Ana Fernández-Palacín & José-Vicente Ríos-Santos & Mariano Herrero-Climent, 2020. "A Non-Interventional Study Documenting Use and Success of Tissue Level Implants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Hélder Oliveira & Aritza Brizuela Velasco & José-Vicente Ríos-Santos & Fernando Sánchez Lasheras & Bernardo Ferreira Lemos & Francisco Javier Gil & Alexandrine Carvalho & Mariano Herrero-Climent, 2020. "Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Paolo Cappare & Gianpaolo Sannino & Margherita Minoli & Pietro Montemezzi & Francesco Ferrini, 2019. "Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hang-Nga Mai & Jaeil Kim & Youn-Hee Choi & Du-Hyeong Lee, 2020. "Accuracy of Portable Face-Scanning Devices for Obtaining Three-Dimensional Face Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. María Isabel Albanchez-González & Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann & Jesús Peláez-Rico & Carlos López-Suárez & Verónica Rodríguez-Alonso & María Jesús Suárez-García, 2022. "Accuracy of Digital Dental Implants Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners Compared with Conventional Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Seokho Ahn & Jaesung Kim & Seok Chan Jeong & Myungil Kim & Cheolyoung Kim & Dongki Park, 2022. "Stress Distribution Analysis of Threaded Implants for Digital Dentistry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Francesca Cattoni & Luca Chirico & Alberto Merlone & Michele Manacorda & Raffaele Vinci & Enrico Felice Gherlone, 2021. "Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Barbara Sobczak & Piotr Majewski, 2022. "An Integrated Fully Digital Prosthetic Workflow for the Immediate Full-Arch Restoration of Edentulous Patients—A Case Report," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-11, March.
    6. Luca Lavorgna & Gabriele Cervino & Luca Fiorillo & Giovanni Di Leo & Giuseppe Troiano & Marco Ortensi & Luigi Galantucci & Marco Cicciù, 2019. "Reliability of a Virtual Prosthodontic Project Realized through a 2D and 3D Photographic Acquisition: An Experimental Study on the Accuracy of Different Digital Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Roberto Lo Giudice & Fausto Famà, 2020. "Health Care and Health Service Digital Revolution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-2, July.
    8. Massimo Robiony & Elena Bocin & Salvatore Sembronio & Fabio Costa & Vittorio Bresadola & Alessandro Tel, 2020. "Redesigning the Paradigms of Clinical Practice for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the Era of Lockdown for COVID-19: From Tradition to Telesemeiology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Ana I. Nicolas-Silvente & Eugenio Velasco-Ortega & Ivan Ortiz-Garcia & Alvaro Jimenez-Guerra & Loreto Monsalve-Guil & Raul Ayuso-Montero & Javier Gil & Jose Lopez-Lopez, 2020. "Influence of Connection Type and Platform Diameter on Titanium Dental Implants Fatigue: Non-Axial Loading Cyclic Test Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Se-Won Park & Ra Gyoung Yoon & Hyunwoo Lee & Heon-Jin Lee & Yong-Do Choi & Du-Hyeong Lee, 2020. "Impacts of Thresholds of Gray Value for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction on the Accuracy of Image Matching with Optical Scan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-11, September.
    11. Naia Bustamante-Hernández & Jose María Montiel-Company & Carlos Bellot-Arcís & José Félix Mañes-Ferrer & María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz & Rubén Agustín-Panadero & Lucía Fernández-Estevan, 2020. "Clinical Behavior of Ceramic, Hybrid and Composite Onlays. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Jaime Orejas-Perez & Beatriz Gimenez-Gonzalez & Ignacio Ortiz-Collado & Israel J. Thuissard & Andrea Santamaria-Laorden, 2022. "In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9453-:d:463629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.