IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p7992-d437607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rubella Immunity among Italian Female Healthcare Workers: A Serological Study

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Coppeta

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Cristiana Ferrari

    (School of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Ilaria Iannuzzi

    (School of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Iacopo D’Alessandro

    (School of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Ottavia Balbi

    (School of Occupational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Antonio Pietroiusti

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Marco Trabucco Aurilio

    (Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy)

Abstract

Rubella, also known as German measles or three-day measles, is an infectious disease caused by virus of the genus Rubivirus, which may be prevented by vaccination. The infection is potentially dangerous for non immune subjects, although 20–50% of infected subjects are asymptomatic. Healthcare workers (HCWs) have an increased potential exposure to rubella in comparison to the general population, putting them and their patients at risk of infection and its complications. In 2019, 20 cases of rubella have been reported in Italy. According to the Italian National Immunization and Prevention Plan, HCWs should provide a written certification of vaccination for rubella or serological evidence of protective antibodies. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rubella immunization status in female HCWs of the teaching hospital Policlinic Rome Tor Vergata (PTV) of childbearing age. For this purpose, we retrospectively checked the serologic values of rubella-specific IgG antibodies analyzing the clinical records of the HCWs of undergoing the occupational health surveillance program from January 1st to June1st 2020. Five hundred fourteen HCWs with a mean age of 23.19 (range 19–37, DS: 2.80) were included: 90.3% (464) showed a protective antibody titre. The mean value of the anti-rubella IgG was 49.59 IU/mL. Our study shows a non-protective anti rubella IgG titre in a substantial percentage of HCWs (9.7%). As vaccine protection decreases over the years and the risk of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in vaccinated subjects should not be underestimated, we suggest routine screening of the immunological status followed by the administration of a third dose of vaccine if the antibody titre becomes non-protective.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Coppeta & Cristiana Ferrari & Ilaria Iannuzzi & Iacopo D’Alessandro & Ottavia Balbi & Antonio Pietroiusti & Marco Trabucco Aurilio, 2020. "Rubella Immunity among Italian Female Healthcare Workers: A Serological Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-6, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7992-:d:437607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7992/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7992/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Trabucco Aurilio & Francesco Saverio Mennini & Claudia Nardone & Andrea Piccioni & Matteo Bolcato & Vincenzo Russo & Valerio Sciannamea & Raffaele Migliorini & Luca Coppeta & Andrea Magrini, 2022. "Health and Economic Impact of Atrial Fibrillation of Workers in Italy: Social Security Benefits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-8, February.
    2. Luca Coppeta & Cristiana Ferrari & Marco Trabucco Aurilio & Gianluigi Ferrazza & Andrea Magrini & Stefano Rizza, 2022. "Night Shift Work Is Associated with Reduced Rate of Humoral Response Following Vaccination for HBV," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-7, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7992-:d:437607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.