IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7583-d430926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Psychometric Properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 for Pregnant Women

Author

Listed:
  • María de la Fe Rodríguez-Muñoz

    (Department of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Natalia Ruiz-Segovia

    (Department of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Cristina Soto-Balbuena

    (Deparment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain)

  • Huynh-Nhu Le

    (Department of Psychology, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

  • María Eugenia Olivares-Crespo

    (Deparment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Instituto de Salud de la Mujer José Botella Llusiá, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Faculty of Medicine Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Nuria Izquierdo-Méndez

    (Deparment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Instituto de Salud de la Mujer José Botella Llusiá, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Faculty of Medicine Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Background: Perinatal anxiety and depression are common complications during pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to examine the item characteristics, reliability, validity, and factorial structure of the four-item Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) and to determine the associations between scale scores and sociodemographic factors in a sample of pregnant women from Spain. Method: A total of 845 pregnant women were recruited from two public hospitals in Spain between 2014 and 2016. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire that included Patient Health Questionnaire-4, including the two-item Patient Health Questionnaire and the two-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener. Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and scale inter-correlations between the PHQ-4 and PHQ-9 revealed that the PHQ-4 has a bivariate structure and adequately assesses the dimensions of antenatal anxiety and depression. Conclusion : The PHQ-4 is a reliable and valid instrument to screen for depression and anxiety during pregnancy. The PHQ-4 is an ultra-brief measure that can be used to screen for antenatal depression and anxiety to prevent the negative consequences associated with these mental health conditions among mothers and infants.

Suggested Citation

  • María de la Fe Rodríguez-Muñoz & Natalia Ruiz-Segovia & Cristina Soto-Balbuena & Huynh-Nhu Le & María Eugenia Olivares-Crespo & Nuria Izquierdo-Méndez, 2020. "The Psychometric Properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 for Pregnant Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-10, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7583-:d:430926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7583/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7583/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qiu-Yue Zhong & Bizu Gelaye & Alan M Zaslavsky & Jesse R Fann & Marta B Rondon & Sixto E Sánchez & Michelle A Williams, 2015. "Diagnostic Validity of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7) among Pregnant Women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanna Baran & Katarzyna Kalandyk-Osinko & Rafał Baran, 2022. "Does Prenatal Physical Activity Affect the Occurrence of Postnatal Anxiety and Depression? Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Urszula Nowacka & Szymon Kozlowski & Marcin Januszewski & Janusz Sierdzinski & Artur Jakimiuk & Tadeusz Issat, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Anxiety in Pregnant Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Dominique L G Van Praag & Haghish Ebad Fardzadeh & Amra Covic & Andrew I R Maas & Nicole von Steinbüchel, 2020. "Preliminary validation of the Dutch version of the Posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) after traumatic brain injury in a civilian population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Karen Yirmiya & Noa Yakirevich-Amir & Heidi Preis & Amit Lotan & Shir Atzil & Inbal Reuveni, 2021. "Women’s Depressive Symptoms during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Pregnancy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7583-:d:430926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.