IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6922-d417286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leaders’ Future Orientation and Public Health Investment Intention: A Moderated Mediation Model of Self-Efficacy and Perceived Social Support

Author

Listed:
  • Jianming Wang

    (School of Business Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Tsung Piao Chou

    (Department of Business Administration, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan)

  • Chia-Pin Chen

    (Department of Business Administration, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan)

  • Xiangzhi Bu

    (Department of Business Administration, Business School, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, Guangdong, China)

Abstract

Prior studies have investigated the issue of public health and health policy from economic, environmental, and healthcare perspectives. Research on public health from leaders’ perspective may also help to advance our knowledge about leaders’ perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions toward public health management. Therefore, this study is based on social ideal theory, social cognitive theory, and social trust theory to investigate the influence of leaders’ future orientation on public health investment intention with the mediating role of leaders’ self-efficacy and the moderating role of perceived social support. Using a structural equation modeling with a sample data of 381 leaders of government agencies in Vietnam, empirical results indicate that leaders’ future orientation has a positive influence on public health investment intention. Furthermore, self-efficacy is found to have a positive mediating effect in the relationship between leaders’ future orientation and public health investment intention. In addition, perceived social support positively moderates the link between leaders’ future orientation and self-efficacy. Perceived social support also moderates the indirect effect of leaders’ future orientation on public health investment intention through self-efficacy. On one hand, this study contributes to theoretical research by clarifying the effects of leaders’ perceptions, and cognitive and behavioral intentions toward public health investment. Findings of this study may have implications for researchers who may have interest in studying the issue of public health management from leaders’ viewpoints. On the other hand, this study contributes to practitioners since understanding how leaders’ characteristics affect public health investment will enhance the quality of policy makers’ decision-making in improving public health for citizens and society.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianming Wang & Tsung Piao Chou & Chia-Pin Chen & Xiangzhi Bu, 2020. "Leaders’ Future Orientation and Public Health Investment Intention: A Moderated Mediation Model of Self-Efficacy and Perceived Social Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6922-:d:417286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6922/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6922/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliver, Kathryn & Everett, Martin & Verma, Arpana & de Vocht, Frank, 2012. "The human factor: Re-organisations in public health policy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 97-103.
    2. Degeling, Chris & Carter, Stacy M. & Rychetnik, Lucie, 2015. "Which public and why deliberate? – A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 114-121.
    3. Bosworth, Ryan & Cameron, Trudy Ann & DeShazo, J.R., 2015. "Willingness to pay for public health policies to treat illnesses," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 74-88.
    4. Fu, Minghui & Liu, Chuanjiang & Yang, Mian, 2020. "Effects of public health policies on the health status and medical service utilization of Chinese internal migrants," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Rathbun, Brian C., 2011. "Before Hegemony: Generalized Trust and the Creation and Design of International Security Organizations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 243-273, April.
    6. Tubbing, Luuk & Harting, Janneke & Stronks, Karien, 2015. "Unravelling the concept of integrated public health policy: Concept mapping with Dutch experts from science, policy, and practice," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(6), pages 749-759.
    7. Jansson, Elisabeth & Fosse, Elisabeth & Tillgren, Per, 2011. "National public health policy in a local context—Implementation in two Swedish municipalities," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 219-227.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mulderij, Lisanne S. & Wolters, Fieke & Verkooijen, Kirsten T. & Koelen, Maria A. & Groenewoud, Stef & Wagemakers, Annemarie, 2020. "Effective elements of care-physical activity initiatives for adults with a low socioeconomic status: A concept mapping study with health promotion experts," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Halkos, George E & Aslanidis, Panagiotis-Stavros & Landis, Conrad & Papadaki, Lydia & Koundouri, Phoebe, 2024. "A review on primary and cascading hazards by exploring individuals’ willingness-to-pay for urban sustainability policies," MPRA Paper 122262, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Arthur E. Attema & Han Bleichrodt & Olivier L’Haridon & Patrick Peretti-Watel & Valérie Seror, 2018. "Discounting health and money: New evidence using a more robust method," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 117-140, April.
    4. Dickie, Mark & Adamowicz, Wiktor & Gerking, Shelby & Veronesi, Marcella, 2022. "Risk Perception, Learning, and Willingness to Pay to Reduce Heart Disease Risk," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 363-382, October.
    5. Mæhle, Per Magnus & Smeland, Sigbjørn, 2021. "Implementing cancer patient pathways in Scandinavia how structuring might affect the acceptance of a politically imposed reform," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(10), pages 1340-1350.
    6. Isaac Pergher & Vanessa Patzlaff Brandolf & Diego Augusto de Jesus Pacheco & Guilherme Luís Roehe Vaccaro, 2016. "A patient-centric approach to improve health care services," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1227232-122, December.
    7. Degeling, Chris & Rychetnik, Lucie & Street, Jackie & Thomas, Rae & Carter, Stacy M., 2017. "Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 166-171.
    8. Mark Fabian & Anna Alexandrova & Yamini Cinamon Nair, 2023. "Coproducing Wellbeing Policy: A Theory of Thriving in Financial Hardship," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 2309-2330, October.
    9. Chen, Yu & Huang, Feng & Zhou, Qin, 2023. "Equality of public health service and family doctor contract service utilisation among migrants in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    10. Louise K Wiles & Debra Kay & Julie A Luker & Anthea Worley & Jane Austin & Allan Ball & Alan Bevan & Michael Cousins & Sarah Dalton & Ellie Hodges & Lidia Horvat & Ellen Kerrins & Julie Marker & Miche, 2022. "Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-26, January.
    11. Siria Angino & Federico M Ferrara & Stefania Secola, 2022. "The cultural origins of institutional trust: The case of the European Central Bank," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(2), pages 212-235, June.
    12. Tanja Brüchert & Paula Quentin & Sabine Baumgart & Gabriele Bolte, 2021. "Barriers, Facilitating Factors, and Intersectoral Collaboration for Promoting Active Mobility for Healthy Aging—A Qualitative Study within Local Government in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Brad R. Humphreys & Gary A. Wagner & John C. Whitehead & Pamela Wicker, 2023. "Willingness to pay for policies to reduce health risks from COVID‐19: Evidence from U.S. professional sports," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 218-231, January.
    14. Dale, Elina & Evans, David B. & Gopinathan, Unni & Kurowski, Christoph & Norheim, Ole F. & Ottersen, Trygve & Voorhoeve, Alex, 2023. "Open and inclusive: fair processes for financing universal health coverage," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119795, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Hammitt, James K. & Haninger, Kevin, 2017. "Valuing nonfatal health risk as a function of illness severity and duration: Benefit transfer using QALYs," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 17-38.
    16. Kathryn Oliver & Warren Pearce, 2017. "Three lessons from evidence-based medicine and policy: increase transparency, balance inputs and understand power," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-7, December.
    17. Peter Zweifel, 2022. "Health economics explained through six questions and answers," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 50-69, February.
    18. Jianming Wang & Ninh Nguyen & Xiangzhi Bu, 2020. "Exploring the Roles of Green Food Consumption and Social Trust in the Relationship between Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Psychological Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Florian Justwan, 2017. "Trusting Publics," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(3), pages 590-614, March.
    20. Marcel F. Jonker & Bas Donkers & Esther de Bekker‐Grob & Elly A. Stolk, 2019. "Attribute level overlap (and color coding) can reduce task complexity, improve choice consistency, and decrease the dropout rate in discrete choice experiments," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 350-363, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6922-:d:417286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.