IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6886-d416624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of Patient-Centred Medical Home-Based Models of Care versus Standard Primary Care in Chronic Disease Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised and Non-Randomised Controlled Trials

Author

Listed:
  • James Rufus John

    (Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2560, Australia
    Rozetta Institute, Level 4, 55 Harrington Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia)

  • Hir Jani

    (Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2560, Australia)

  • Kath Peters

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2560, Australia)

  • Kingsley Agho

    (Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2560, Australia
    School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2560, Australia)

  • W. Kathy Tannous

    (Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2560, Australia
    School of Business, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2150, Australia)

Abstract

Patient-centred care by a coordinated primary care team may be more effective than standard care in chronic disease management. We synthesised evidence to determine whether patient-centred medical home (PCMH)-based care models are more effective than standard general practitioner (GP) care in improving biomedical, hospital, and economic outcomes. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched to identify randomised (RCTs) and non-randomised controlled trials that evaluated two or more principles of PCMH among primary care patients with chronic diseases. Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal tools, and grading of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach were conducted independently. A quantitative synthesis, where possible, was pooled using random effects models and the effect size estimates of standardised mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals were reported. Of the 13,820 citations, we identified 78 eligible RCTs and 7 quasi trials which included 60,617 patients. The findings suggested that PCMH-based care was associated with significant improvements in depression episodes (SMD −0.24; 95% CI −0.35, −0.14; I 2 = 76%) and increased odds of remission (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.46, 2.21; I 2 = 0%). There were significant improvements in the health-related quality of life (SMD 0.10; 95% CI 0.04, 0.15; I 2 = 51%), self-management outcomes (SMD 0.24; 95% CI 0.03, 0.44; I 2 = 83%), and hospital admissions (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.70, 0.98; I 2 = 0%). In terms of biomedical outcomes, with exception to total cholesterol, PCMH-based care led to significant improvements in blood pressure, glycated haemoglobin, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol outcomes. The incremental cost of PCMH care was identified to be small and significantly higher than standard care (SMD 0.17; 95% CI 0.08, 0.26; I 2 = 82%). The quality of individual studies ranged from “fair” to “good” by meeting at least 60% of items on the quality appraisal checklist. Additionally, moderate to high heterogeneity across studies in outcomes resulted in downgrading the included studies as moderate or low grade of evidence. PCMH-based care has been found to be superior to standard GP care in chronic disease management. Results of the review have important implications that may inform patient, practice, and policy-level changes.

Suggested Citation

  • James Rufus John & Hir Jani & Kath Peters & Kingsley Agho & W. Kathy Tannous, 2020. "The Effectiveness of Patient-Centred Medical Home-Based Models of Care versus Standard Primary Care in Chronic Disease Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised and Non-Randomise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-42, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6886-:d:416624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6886/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6886/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:7381 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jonathan Stokes & Maria Panagioti & Rahul Alam & Kath Checkland & Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi & Peter Bower, 2015. "Effectiveness of Case Management for 'At Risk' Patients in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-42, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zoe Zon Be Lim & Mumtaz Mohamed Kadir & Mimaika Luluina Ginting & Hubertus Johannes Maria Vrijhoef & Joanne Yoong & Chek Hooi Wong, 2021. "Early Implementation of a Patient-Centered Medical Home in Singapore: A Qualitative Study Using Theory on Diffusion of Innovations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Shilpa Surendran & Chuan De Foo & Chen Hee Tam & Elaine Qiao Ying Ho & David Bruce Matchar & Josip Car & Gerald Choon Huat Koh, 2021. "The Missed Opportunity of Patient-Centered Medical Homes to Thrive in an Asian Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Gloria Reig-Garcia & Rosa Suñer-Soler & Susana Mantas-Jiménez & Anna Bonmatí-Tomas & Maria Carmen Malagón-Aguilera & Cristina Bosch-Farré & Sandra Gelabert-Viella & Dolors Juvinyà-Canal, 2021. "Assessing Nurses’ Satisfaction with Continuity of Care and the Case Management Model as an Indicator of Quality of Care in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Ryuichi Ohta & Yoshinori Ryu & Takuji Katsube & Chiaki Sano, 2020. "Rural Homecare Nurses’ Challenges in Providing Seamless Patient Care in Rural Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Mimaika Luluina Ginting & Chek Hooi Wong & Zoe Zon Be Lim & Robin Wai Munn Choo & Sheena Camilla Hirose Carlsen & Grace Sum & Hubertus Johannes Maria Vrijhoef, 2022. "A Patient-Centred Medical Home Care Model for Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Singapore: A Mixed-Method Study on Patient’s Care Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Sharon Ngoh & Wern Ee Tang & Edwin Chng & Phui-Nah Chong, 2022. "Comment on Surendran et al. The Missed Opportunity of Patient-Centered Medical Homes to Thrive in an Asian Context. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18 , 1817," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-4, April.
    7. Angélique Herrler & Helena Kukla & Vera Vennedey & Stephanie Stock, 2022. "What matters to people aged 80 and over regarding ambulatory care? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 325-339, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fredens, Mia & Terkildsen, Morten Deleuran & Bollerup, Stina & Albæk, Jens & Nissen, Nina Konstantin & Winther, Susanne & Grønkjær, Mette & Rasmussen, Maja Kjær & Benthien, Kirstine Skov & Toft, Ulla , 2020. "The national implementation of 'Proactive Health Support' in Denmark since 2017: Expectations and challenges for the telephone-based self-management program," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(7), pages 674-678.
    2. David Ponka & Eric Agbata & Claire Kendall & Vicky Stergiopoulos & Oreen Mendonca & Olivia Magwood & Ammar Saad & Bonnie Larson & Annie Huiru Sun & Neil Arya & Terry Hannigan & Kednapa Thavorn & Anne , 2020. "The effectiveness of case management interventions for the homeless, vulnerably housed and persons with lived experience: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, April.
    3. David G. Lugo‐Palacios & Jonathan M. Clarke & Søren Rud Kristensen, 2023. "Back to basics: A mediation analysis approach to addressing the fundamental questions of integrated care evaluations," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(9), pages 2080-2097, September.
    4. Duminy, Lize & Ress, Vanessa & Wild, Eva-Maria, 2022. "Complex community health and social care interventions – Which features lead to reductions in hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions? A systematic literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(12), pages 1206-1225.
    5. Vanessa Ress & Eva‐Maria Wild, 2024. "The impact of integrated care on health care utilization and costs in a socially deprived urban area in Germany: A difference‐in‐differences approach within an event‐study framework," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 229-247, February.
    6. Stokes, Jonathan & Lau, Yiu-Shing & Kristensen, Søren Rud & Sutton, Matt, 2019. "Does pooling health & social care budgets reduce hospital use and lower costs?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 382-388.
    7. Piroddi, Roberta & Downing, Jennifer & Duckworth, Helen & Barr, Benjamin, 2022. "The impact of an integrated care intervention on mortality and unplanned hospital admissions in a disadvantaged community in England: A difference-in-differences study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(6), pages 549-557.
    8. Karine Moschetti & Katia Iglesias & Stéphanie Baggio & Venetia Velonaki & Olivier Hugli & Bernard Burnand & Jean-Bernard Daeppen & Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen & Patrick Bodenmann, 2018. "Health care costs of case management for frequent users of the emergency department: Hospital and insurance perspectives," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Luke B. Connelly & Gianluca Fiorentini, 2021. "Structural factors and integrated care interventions: is there a role for economists in the policy debate?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(8), pages 1141-1150, November.
    10. Jee Young Joo & Megan F. Liu, 2019. "Effectiveness of Nurse-Led Case Management in Cancer Care: Systematic Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 28(8), pages 968-991, November.
    11. John H Wasson & Lynn Ho & Laura Soloway & L Gordon Moore, 2018. "Validation of the What Matters Index: A brief, patient-reported index that guides care for chronic conditions and can substitute for computer-generated risk models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6886-:d:416624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.