IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6682-d413231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Focus Improve Performance in Elective Surgery? A Study of Obesity Surgery in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Svarts

    (Department of Industrial Economics and Management, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Luca Urciuoli

    (Department of Industrial Economics and Management, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden
    Zaragoza Logistics Center, MIT International Logistics Program, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Anders Thorell

    (Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, 18288 Stockholm, Sweden
    Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, 11691 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Mats Engwall

    (Department of Industrial Economics and Management, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

Recent studies have found positive effects from hospital focus on both quality and cost. Some studies indicate that certain patient segments benefit from focus, while others have worse outcomes in focused hospital departments. The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between hospital focus and performance in elective surgery. We studied obesity surgery procedures performed in Sweden in 2016 (5152 patients), using data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg) complemented by a survey of all clinics that performed obesity surgery. We examined focus at two levels of the organization: hospital level and department level. We hypothesized that higher proportions of obesity surgery patients in the hospital, and higher proportions of obesity surgery procedures in the department, would be associated with better performance. These hypotheses were tested using multilevel regression analysis, while controlling for patient characteristics and procedural volume. We found that focus was associated with improved outcomes in terms of reduced complications and shorter procedure times. These positive relationships were present at both hospital and department level, but the effect was larger at the department level. The findings imply that focus is a viable strategy to improve quality and reduce costs for patients undergoing elective surgery. For these patients, general hospitals should consider implementing organizationally separate units for patients undergoing elective surgery.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Svarts & Luca Urciuoli & Anders Thorell & Mats Engwall, 2020. "Does Focus Improve Performance in Elective Surgery? A Study of Obesity Surgery in Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6682-:d:413231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6682/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6682/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Vera & Pythagoras Petratos & Torsten Oliver Salge, 2018. "A widening gap? Static and dynamic performance differences between specialist and general hospitals," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 25-36, March.
    2. Jones, Hayley E. & Spiegelhalter, David J., 2011. "The Identification of “Unusual†Health-Care Providers From a Hierarchical Model," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 65(3), pages 154-163.
    3. Ludwig Kuntz & Stefan Scholtes & Sandra Sülz, 2019. "Separate and Concentrate: Accounting for Patient Complexity in General Hospitals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2482-2501, June.
    4. Vedran Capkun & Martin Messner & Clemens Rissbacher, 2012. "Service Specialization and Operational Performance in Hospitals," Post-Print hal-00715580, HAL.
    5. Barro, Jason R. & Huckman, Robert S. & Kessler, Daniel P., 2006. "The effects of cardiac specialty hospitals on the cost and quality of medical care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 702-721, July.
    6. Robert S. Huckman & Darren E. Zinner, 2008. "Does focus improve operational performance? Lessons from the management of clinical trials," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 173-193, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Vera & Pythagoras Petratos & Torsten Oliver Salge, 2018. "A widening gap? Static and dynamic performance differences between specialist and general hospitals," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 25-36, March.
    2. Jonathan R. Clark & Robert S. Huckman, 2012. "Broadening Focus: Spillovers, Complementarities, and Specialization in the Hospital Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(4), pages 708-722, April.
    3. Diwas Singh KC & Christian Terwiesch, 2011. "The Effects of Focus on Performance: Evidence from California Hospitals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(11), pages 1897-1912, November.
    4. D'Aniello, Luca & Spano, Maria & Cuccurullo, Corrado & Aria, Massimo, 2022. "Academic Health Centers’ configurations, scientific productivity, and impact: Insights from the Italian setting," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(12), pages 1317-1323.
    5. Michael Freeman & Nicos Savva & Stefan Scholtes, 2021. "Economies of Scale and Scope in Hospitals: An Empirical Study of Volume Spillovers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 673-697, February.
    6. Felix Miedaner & Sandra Sülz, 2020. "Boundaries of Focus and Volume: An Empirical Study in Neonatal Intensive Care," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 298-308, February.
    7. Bauer, Carsten & Möbs, Nele & Unger, Oliver & Szczesny, Andrea & Ernst, Christian, 2020. "Spillover Effects of Specialization Strategies in Hospitals: An Analysis of the Effects in the Short, Medium, and Long Term," EconStor Preprints 215783, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Diwas Singh KC & Bradley R. Staats, 2012. "Accumulating a Portfolio of Experience: The Effect of Focal and Related Experience on Surgeon Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 618-633, October.
    9. Suhui Li & Avi Dor, 2013. "How Do Hospitals Respond to Market Entry? Evidence from A Deregulated Market for Cardiac Revascularization," NBER Working Papers 18926, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. David H. Howard & Guy David & Jason Hockenberry, 2017. "Selective Hearing: Physician‐Ownership and Physicians’ Response to New Evidence," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 152-168, February.
    11. Sara Parker‐Lue & Marvin Lieberman, 2020. "The impact of diversification on task performance: Evidence from kidney transplant centers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(7), pages 1169-1190, July.
    12. Cooper, Zack & Gibbons, Stephen & Skellern, Matthew, 2018. "Does competition from private surgical centres improve public hospitals' performance? Evidence from the English National Health Service," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 63-80.
    13. Trybou, Jeroen & De Regge, Melissa & Gemmel, Paul & Duyck, Philippe & Annemans, Lieven, 2014. "Effects of physician-owned specialized facilities in health care: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 316-340.
    14. Barker, Jordan M. & Gibson, Andrew R. & Hofer, Adriana R. & Hofer, Christian & Moussaoui, Issam & Scott, Marc A., 2021. "A competitive dynamics perspective on the diversification of third-party logistics providers’ service portfolios," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Rachna Shah & George P. Ball & Serguei Netessine, 2017. "Plant Operations and Product Recalls in the Automotive Industry: An Empirical Investigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(8), pages 2439-2459, August.
    16. Katherine Bobroske & Michael Freeman & Lawrence Huan & Anita Cattrell & Stefan Scholtes, 2022. "Curbing the Opioid Epidemic at Its Root: The Effect of Provider Discordance After Opioid Initiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 2003-2015, March.
    17. Afschin Gandjour, 2011. "Germany’s decision rule for setting ceiling prices of drugs," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 65-71, March.
    18. Joris Knoben & Leon A. G. Oerlemans & Annefleur R. Krijkamp & Keith G. Provan, 2018. "What Do They Know? The Antecedents of Information Accuracy Differentials in Interorganizational Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 471-488, June.
    19. Angelovská Olga & Novotný Vilém, 2022. "Reforms of Czech Hospitals in Multiple Streams Perspective: The Cases of Success and Failure," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 30-45, December.
    20. Swanson, Ashley, 2021. "Physician investment in hospitals: Specialization, selection, and quality in cardiac care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6682-:d:413231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.