IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i17p6038-d401203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomedical Holistic Ontology for People with Rare Diseases

Author

Listed:
  • Laia Subirats

    (Eurecat, Centre Tecnològic de Catalunya, C/Bilbao, 72, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
    eHealth Center, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Rambla del Poblenou, 156, 08018 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Jordi Conesa

    (eHealth Center, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Rambla del Poblenou, 156, 08018 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Manuel Armayones

    (eHealth Center, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Rambla del Poblenou, 156, 08018 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

This research provides a biomedical ontology to adequately represent the information necessary to manage a person with a disease in the context of a specific patient. A bottom-up approach was used to build the ontology, best ontology practices described in the literature were followed and the minimum information to reference an external ontology term (MIREOT) methodology was used to add external terms of other ontologies when possible. Public data of rare diseases from rare associations were used to build the ontology. In addition, sentiment analysis was performed in the standardized data using the Python library Textblob. A new holistic ontology was built, which models 25 real scenarios of people with rare diseases. We conclude that a comprehensive profile of patients is needed in biomedical ontologies. The generated code is openly available, so this research is partially reproducible. Depending on the knowledge needed, several views of the ontology should be generated. Links to other ontologies should be used more often to model the knowledge more precisely and improve flexibility. The proposed holistic ontology has many benefits, such as a more standardized computation of sentiment analysis between attributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Laia Subirats & Jordi Conesa & Manuel Armayones, 2020. "Biomedical Holistic Ontology for People with Rare Diseases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6038-:d:401203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6038/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6038/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Vries, Erik & Schoonvelde, Martijn & Schumacher, Gijs, 2018. "No Longer Lost in Translation: Evidence that Google Translate Works for Comparative Bag-of-Words Text Applications," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(4), pages 417-430, October.
    2. Mireia Calvo & Laia Subirats & Luigi Ceccaroni & José María Maroto & Carmen De Pablo & Felip Miralles, 2013. "Automatic Assessment of Socioeconomic Impact on Cardiac Rehabilitation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Laia Subirats & Natalia Reguera & Antonio Miguel Bañón & Beni Gómez-Zúñiga & Julià Minguillón & Manuel Armayones, 2018. "Mining Facebook Data of People with Rare Diseases: A Content-Based and Temporal Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fraccaroli, Nicolò & Giovannini, Alessandro & Jamet, Jean-François & Persson, Eric, 2022. "Ideology and monetary policy. The role of political parties’ stances in the European Central Bank’s parliamentary hearings," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Konstantinos G. Papaspyropoulos & Harikleia Liakou & Panayotis Dimopoulos, 2023. "Climate Change in the Biodiversity and Forest Strategies in Greece Using Discourse Analysis and Text Mining: Is an Integration into a Cost-Efficient Natural Resources Policy Feasible?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Ferrara, Federico M. & Masciandaro, Donato & Moschella, Manuela & Romelli, Davide, 2022. "Political voice on monetary policy: Evidence from the parliamentary hearings of the European Central Bank," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Hauke Licht & Ronja Sczepanski & Moritz Laurer & Ayjeren Bekmuratovna, 2024. "No More Cost in Translation: Validating Open-Source Machine Translation for Quantitative Text Analysis," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 276, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    5. Mónica D. Oliveira & Inês Mataloto & Panos Kanavos, 2019. "Multi-criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment: addressing methodological challenges to improve the state of the art," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(6), pages 891-918, August.
    6. Christopher Wratil & Sara B Hobolt, 2019. "Public deliberations in the Council of the European Union: Introducing and validating DICEU," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(3), pages 511-531, September.
    7. Seraphine F. Maerz & Carsten Q. Schneider, 2020. "Comparing public communication in democracies and autocracies: automated text analyses of speeches by heads of government," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 517-545, April.
    8. Mingzhe Wei & Georgios Sermpinis & Charalampos Stasinakis, 2023. "Forecasting and trading Bitcoin with machine learning techniques and a hybrid volatility/sentiment leverage," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 852-871, July.
    9. Nicolò Fraccaroli & Alessandro Giovannini & Jean-François Jamet & Eric Persson, 2023. "Central Banks in Parliaments: A Text Analysis of the Parliamentary Hearings of the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, and the Federal Reserve," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 19(2), pages 543-600, June.
    10. Woohyuk Kim & Sung-Bum Kim & Eunhye Park, 2021. "Mapping Tourists’ Destination (Dis)Satisfaction Attributes with User-Generated Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Markus Gastinger & Henning Schmidtke, 2023. "Measuring precision precisely: A dictionary-based measure of imprecision," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 553-571, July.
    12. Luis Aue & Florian Börgel, 2023. "From “Bangtan Boys” to “International Relations Professor”: Mapping Self‐Identifications in the UN’s Twitter Public," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 120-133.
    13. Heidenreich, Tobias & Eberl, Jakob-Moritz & Lind, Fabienne & Boomgaarden, Hajo G., 2022. "Discontentment trumps Euphoria: Interacting with European Politicians’ migration-related messages on social media," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-1.
    14. Bes, Bart Joachim & Schoonvelde, Martijn & Rauh, Christian, 2020. "Undermining, defusing or defending European integration? Assessing public communication of European executives in times of EU politicisation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 397-423.
    15. Fraccaroli, Nicolò & Giovannini, Alessandro & Jamet, Jean-Francois & Persson, Eric, 2022. "Ideology and monetary policy: the role of political parties’ stances in the ECB’s parliamentary hearings," Working Paper Series 2655, European Central Bank.
    16. Winslet Ting Yan Chan & Chi Hong Leung, 2021. "Mind the Gap: Discrepancy Between Customer Expectation and Perception on Commercial Chatbots Usage," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, January.
    17. Damien Pennetreau & Thomas Laloux, 2021. "Talkin’ ‘bout a Negotiation: (Un)Transparent Rapporteurs’ Speeches in the European Parliament," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 248-260.
    18. Donato Masciandaro & Oana Peia & Davide Romelli, 2024. "Central bank communication and social media: From silence to Twitter," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 365-388, April.
    19. Lazaros Vrysis & Nikolaos Vryzas & Rigas Kotsakis & Theodora Saridou & Maria Matsiola & Andreas Veglis & Carlos Arcila-Calderón & Charalampos Dimoulas, 2021. "A Web Interface for Analyzing Hate Speech," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Ueli Reber & Manuel Fischer & Karin Ingold & Felix Kienast & Anna M. Hersperger & Rolf Grütter & Robin Benz, 2022. "Integrating biodiversity: a longitudinal and cross-sectoral analysis of Swiss politics," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(2), pages 311-335, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6038-:d:401203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.