IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i16p5739-d396329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Media Coverage of Pedophilia: Benefits and Risks from Healthcare Practitioners’ Point of View

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Stelzmann

    (Institute of Sexology and Sexual Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
    Institute for Media and Communication Studies, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany)

  • Sara Jahnke

    (Department of Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany)

  • Laura F. Kuhle

    (Institute of Sexology and Sexual Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

The fierce stigma associated with pedophilia may interfere with attempts to prevent sexual offending. Prior research on the effects of media reports about pedophilia mostly focused on their role in perpetuating stigma in the general population. In order to better understand potential benefits and risks of the media coverage on people with pedophilia and specialized prevention and treatment efforts, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 11 healthcare practitioners of the German Prevention Network “Don’t offend”. Healthcare practitioners described positive (e.g., raising awareness for prevention offers) as well as negative (e.g., perpetuating the existing public stigma) effects of the media coverage and estimated that only about one-third of media coverage portrays pedophilia realistically. To destigmatize pedophilia and benefit the prevention of child sexual abuse, a fact box for journalists was developed based on practitioners’ expert knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Stelzmann & Sara Jahnke & Laura F. Kuhle, 2020. "Media Coverage of Pedophilia: Benefits and Risks from Healthcare Practitioners’ Point of View," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5739-:d:396329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5739/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5739/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eduardo Miranda Santos, Marcos & Ronie Sá-Silva, Jackson, 2024. "Medical science and pedophilia: Knowledge, discourses, and representations of pedophilia in medical books from 1910 to 1990 in a Brazilian public library," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Daniela Stelzmann & Sara Jahnke & Laura F. Kuhle, 2022. "Media Coverage of Pedophilia and Its Impact on Help-Seeking Persons with Pedophilia in Germany—A Focus Group Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Chung-Ying Lin & Hector W. H. Tsang, 2020. "Stigma, Health and Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5739-:d:396329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.