Author
Listed:
- Chieh-Liang Wu
(Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan
Department of Automatic Control Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung 407, Taiwan)
- Chia-Hua Liou
(Center for Quality Management, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan)
- Shih-An Liu
(Center for Quality Management, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
Department of Otolaryngolog, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan)
- Wayne H.-H. Sheu
(Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan)
- Shang-Feng Tsai
(School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan
Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung 407, Taiwan)
Abstract
Introduction: Patient support groups (PSGs) should be designed according to the backgrounds of participants and the nature of their diseases. Using health literacy as an outcome indicator for PSGs is rare. Methods: All questionnaires (Mandarin Multidimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire, MMHLQ) were collected from eight PSGs to evaluate the health literacy of participants. Background data of participants were also collected, including patient or family, age, and first-time participation or not. Results: A total of 458 questionnaires were collected from eight PSGs. The diseases were: autoimmune disease (systemic lupus nephritis (SLE), malignancy (head and neck cancer (HNC), chronic disease (diabetes mellitus or DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), hemodialysis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), genetic disease (autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), and degenerative disease (osteoporosis). For vasculitis (42.21 ± 16.49 years old for SLE) and genetic disease (48.95 ± 17.58 years old for ADPKD), participants were younger. More significant differences between first-time participation and MMHLQ scores were found in disease of osteoporosis, CKD, COPD, and hemodialysis. More significant differences between role of participation (patients themselves or family) and MMHLQ scores were found in SLE, ADPKD, hemodialysis, and CKD. More significant differences between age (elderly or not) and MMHLQ score were found in HNC, DM, CKD, COPD, and osteoporosis. Conclusion: Background data of participants varied across different diseases. Different disease natures and patient background statuses should therefore demand different designs in PSG. MMHLQ before PSGs can be used to help to improve the PSG curriculum on the health literacy of patients.
Suggested Citation
Chieh-Liang Wu & Chia-Hua Liou & Shih-An Liu & Wayne H.-H. Sheu & Shang-Feng Tsai, 2020.
"Health Literacy Varies According to Different Background Disease Natures and Characteristics of Participants for Patient Support Groups,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-13, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5702-:d:395730
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5702-:d:395730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.