IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i15p5580-d393570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Illness Concepts and Coping Strategies among Cancer Patients of Turkish and German Origin

Author

Listed:
  • Katja Thein

    (Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
    The present work was performed in fulfilment of the requirements for obtaining the degree “Dr. med.”.)

  • Yesim Erim

    (Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Eva Morawa

    (Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare illness concepts and coping strategies among native German cancer patients and those with a Turkish migration background. Methods: Guideline-based, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 German (♂: 8, ♀: 3) and 11 Turkish (♂: 2, ♀: 9) cancer patients. The transcripts were evaluated using a qualitative content analysis in accordance with Mayring. Results: We identified eight categories of illness concepts: stressful life events, environmental influences, the will of God, medical factors, fate, trauma, health behaviour, and psychological causes. German patients frequently attributed their illness to environmental influences, persistent stress, or medical factors, whereas Turkish patients blamed persistent stress, the will of God, or trauma. The last two categories are not found among German patients. We classified the coping strategies into 11 main categories: social support, activity, patient competence, fighting spirit/positive thinking, use of health services/alternative healing methods, lifestyle, emotional coping, cognitive coping, religious coping, spiritual coping, and culture-specific methods for patients of Turkish origin. For German patients, activities as well as social support played primary roles in coping. Turkish patients also often used social support. However, in contrast to the German patients, they are less active and use much more religious coping and culture-specific means. In addition, negative emotions occur more often when processing the illness than in the German patients. Conclusion: Common illness representations and coping strategies could be found for Turkish and German patients, but also specific ones for the respective group. It is particularly noticeable that German patients attach more importance to medical factors and try more actively to cope with the illness. For Turkish patients, cultural and religious factors play an important role, which should also be considered in treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Katja Thein & Yesim Erim & Eva Morawa, 2020. "Comparison of Illness Concepts and Coping Strategies among Cancer Patients of Turkish and German Origin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5580-:d:393570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5580/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5580/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva Morawa & Yesim Erim, 2014. "Acculturation and Depressive Symptoms among Turkish Immigrants in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristen Jakstis & Leonie K. Fischer, 2021. "Urban Nature and Public Health: How Nature Exposure and Sociocultural Background Relate to Depression Risk," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Ümran Sema Seven & Mendy Stoll & Dennis Dubbert & Christian Kohls & Petra Werner & Elke Kalbe, 2020. "Perception, Attitudes, and Experiences Regarding Mental Health Problems and Web Based Mental Health Information Amongst Young People with and without Migration Background in Germany. A Qualitative Stu," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Lilian Krist & Christina Dornquast & Thomas Reinhold & Heiko Becher & Karl-Heinz Jöckel & Börge Schmidt & Sara Schramm & Katja Icke & Ina Danquah & Stefan N. Willich & Thomas Keil & Tilman Brand, 2021. "Association of Acculturation Status with Longitudinal Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life—Results from a Cohort Study of Adults with Turkish Origin in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5580-:d:393570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.