IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i14p4985-d382996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coital Frequency and the Probability of Pregnancy in Couples Trying to Conceive Their First Child: A Prospective Cohort Study in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Shoko Konishi

    (Department of Human Ecology, School of International Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
    Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Tomoko T. Saotome

    (Interdisciplinary Advanced Medical Research Laboratory, Louis Pasteur Center for Medical Research, Kyoto 606-8225, Japan)

  • Keiko Shimizu

    (Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Okayama University of Science, Okayama 700-0005, Japan)

  • Mari S. Oba

    (Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo 143-8540, Japan)

  • Kathleen A. O’Connor

    (Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

Abstract

Background : Low fertility persists but remains unexplained in Japan. We examined whether the probability of pregnancy was influenced by coital frequency, age, reproductive age (assessed by antimüllerian hormone, AMH), and BMI. Methods: We established a two-year prospective study with a sample of hormonally monitored Japanese women aged 23–34 years wanting to conceive their first child. For a maximum of 24 weeks participants recorded menstrual bleeding, sexual intercourse, ovulation, and pregnancy. Additional information on pregnancy and infertility treatment was collected one and two years after intake. Results: The natural conception rate and coital frequency were both low in this sample. Among 80 participants, 44% (35) naturally conceived in 24 weeks. After two years, 74% (59) of women had delivered or were currently pregnant, 50% (40) due to natural and 24% (19) due to assisted conception, and 5% (4) were lost to follow-up. By two years, 56% (45) of women had sought fertility treatment. In 18% (58/319) of the observed ovarian cycles across 24 weeks there was no intercourse in a fertile period. Higher coital frequency at intake was associated with increased probability of conception by 24 weeks of follow-up (OR 1.23, 95%CI 1.02, 1.47). Chronological age, reproductive age, and BMI were not associated with the probability of pregnancy at 24 weeks. Conclusions: Our results suggest that first, natural conception rates could potentially increase with more frequent and well timed intercourse, and second that further work is needed to understand why even in a motivated sample of women monitoring their fertile periods, both the conception and coitus rates were low.

Suggested Citation

  • Shoko Konishi & Tomoko T. Saotome & Keiko Shimizu & Mari S. Oba & Kathleen A. O’Connor, 2020. "Coital Frequency and the Probability of Pregnancy in Couples Trying to Conceive Their First Child: A Prospective Cohort Study in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:4985-:d:382996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/4985/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/4985/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shoko Konishi & Yuki Mizuno, 2022. "Pre-Conceptional Anti-Thyroid Antibodies and Thyroid Function in Association with Natural Conception Rates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-9, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:4985-:d:382996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.