IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i13p4813-d380302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Risk Evaluation of Trace Elements in Geophagic Kaolinitic Clays within Eastern Dahomey and Niger Delta Basins, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Olaonipekun Oyebanjo

    (Natural History Museum, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife 220282, Osun State, Nigeria
    Directorate of Research and Innovation, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo Province, South Africa)

  • Georges-Ivo Ekosse

    (Directorate of Research and Innovation, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo Province, South Africa)

  • John Odiyo

    (School of Environmental Sciences, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo Province, South Africa)

Abstract

The deliberate consumption of earthly materials is a universally recognised habit with health benefits and risks to those that practice it. Thirteen (13) samples comprising of six (6) Cretaceous and seven (7) Paleogene/Neogene geophagic kaolinitic materials, respectively, were collected and analysed for trace element concentrations (V, Cr, Co, Ni, Zn, Pb, and Fe), and possible risk on consumers’ health. The trace element compositions were obtained using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) and X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) analytical methods. Based on their average concentrations, Fe > V > Cr > Ni > Zn > Pb > Cu > Co and Fe > V > Cr > Zn > Cu > Pb > Ni > Co for the Cretaceous and Paleogene/Neogene geophagic clays, respectively. Iron concentrations were significantly higher in Paleogene/Neogene geophagic clays than in Cretaceous geophagic clays. The nutritional value of Cu and Zn were lower whereas, Cr and Fe were higher than the recommended dietary intake. The index of geoaccumulation (0 < I geo ≤ 1) showed that the geophagic materials were uncontaminated to moderately contaminated by the trace elements. The overall hazard indices (HI) for non-carcinogenic effects showed that the geophagic clays pose threat to children (HI > 1) and no threat to adults (HI < 1) health. However, the carcinogenic risk indices (CRI) for Cr, Ni, and Pb were within acceptable cancer risks (10 −6 < CRI < 10 −4 ) for children and adults. Hence, based on the trace element s HI and CRI, this study concluded that the consumption of Cretaceous and Paleogene/Neogene geophagic kaolinitic clays poses no risks to adult health but children might suffer health risk if the geophagic clays are not beneficiated before ingestion.

Suggested Citation

  • Olaonipekun Oyebanjo & Georges-Ivo Ekosse & John Odiyo, 2020. "Health Risk Evaluation of Trace Elements in Geophagic Kaolinitic Clays within Eastern Dahomey and Niger Delta Basins, Nigeria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4813-:d:380302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4813/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4813/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helena Doležalová Weissmannová & Silvie Mihočová & Petr Chovanec & Jiří Pavlovský, 2019. "Potential Ecological Risk and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Industrial Affected Soils by Coal Mining and Metallurgy in Ostrava, Czech Republic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaowei Xu & Jing Hua & Houhu Zhang & Zehua Zhao & Yi Wang & Dapeng Zhang & Jun Zhang & Xiaoxi Chen, 2021. "Environmental Risk Assessment of Recycled Products of Spent Coppery Etchant in Jiangsu Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-9, July.
    2. Xinjian Chen & Sihua Huang & Xuefeng Xie & Ming Zhu & Jianguo Li & Xiaohan Wang & Lijie Pu, 2020. "Enrichment, Source Apportionment and Health Risk Assessment of Soil Potentially Harmful Elements Associated with Different Land Use in Coastal Tidelands Reclamation Area, Eastern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Yuliang Xiao & Gang Zhang & Jiaxu Guo & Zhe Zhang & Hongyi Wang & Yang Wang & Zhaojun Wang & Hailong Yuan & Dan Cui, 2022. "Pollution Characteristics and Risk Assessments of Mercury in Jiutai, a County Region Thriving on Coal Mining in Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Luísa Diniz & Gelson Carlos & Carmelita Miranda & Pedro Dinis & Rosa Marques & Fernando Tavares Rocha & Eduardo Ferreira da Silva & Agostinho Almeida & Marina Cabral Pinto, 2024. "Soil Geochemical Mapping of the Sal Island (Cape Verde): Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4813-:d:380302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.