IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i11p4058-d368204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of Multi-Residue Method for Quantification of Antibiotics and NSAIDs in Avian Scavengers by Using Small Amounts of Plasma in HPLC-MS-TOF

Author

Listed:
  • Pilar Gómez-Ramírez

    (Toxicology and Forensic Veterinary Service, Dept. of Socio-Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain
    Toxicology and Risk Assessment Group, Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB-Arrixaca), University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain)

  • Guillermo Blanco

    (Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • Antonio Juan García-Fernández

    (Toxicology and Forensic Veterinary Service, Dept. of Socio-Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain
    Toxicology and Risk Assessment Group, Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB-Arrixaca), University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain)

Abstract

Pharmaceuticals are still considered emerging pollutants affecting both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Scavenging bird species may be exposed to veterinary drugs when they feed on livestock carcasses provided at supplementary feeding stations, as these are often stocked with ailing and/or recently medicated animals. Because those animals may be a source of several different pharmaceutical compounds, analytical methods to evaluate residue levels and exposure potential should enable detection and quantification of as many different compounds as possible, preferably from small sample volumes. Four different extraction methods were tested to conduct HPLC-MS-TOF analysis of some of the most common veterinary drugs used in livestock in Spain. The method deemed most viable was a simple extraction, using methanol and 100 µL of plasma, that allowed quantification of seven antibiotics (tetracycline, oxytetracycline, ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim, sulfadiazine) and five nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (meloxicam, flunixin, carprofen, tolfenamic acid, phenylbutazone). The method was then applied to analysis of 29 Eurasian griffon vulture ( Gyps fulvus ) nestling samples, wherein enrofloxacin and tolfenamic acid were most commonly detected (69% and 20%, respectively). To our knowledge, this is the first study including NSAIDs in the exposure assessment of different classes of veterinary pharmaceuticals in live avian scavengers.

Suggested Citation

  • Pilar Gómez-Ramírez & Guillermo Blanco & Antonio Juan García-Fernández, 2020. "Validation of Multi-Residue Method for Quantification of Antibiotics and NSAIDs in Avian Scavengers by Using Small Amounts of Plasma in HPLC-MS-TOF," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:4058-:d:368204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/4058/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/4058/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Lindsay Oaks & Martin Gilbert & Munir Z. Virani & Richard T. Watson & Carol U. Meteyer & Bruce A. Rideout & H. L. Shivaprasad & Shakeel Ahmed & Muhammad Jamshed Iqbal Chaudhry & Muhammad Arshad & S, 2004. "Diclofenac residues as the cause of vulture population decline in Pakistan," Nature, Nature, vol. 427(6975), pages 630-633, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nayden Chakarov & Guillermo Blanco, 2021. "Blood Parasites in Sympatric Vultures: Role of Nesting Habits and Effects on Body Condition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregor Devine & Michael Furlong, 2007. "Insecticide use: Contexts and ecological consequences," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 24(3), pages 281-306, September.
    2. Richard Cuthbert & Mark A Taggart & Vibhu Prakash & Mohini Saini & Devendra Swarup & Suchitra Upreti & Rafael Mateo & Soumya Sunder Chakraborty & Parag Deori & Rhys E Green, 2011. "Effectiveness of Action in India to Reduce Exposure of Gyps Vultures to the Toxic Veterinary Drug Diclofenac," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-11, May.
    3. Anne Chapman, 2006. "Regulating Chemicals—From Risks to Riskiness," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 603-616, June.
    4. Eyal Frank & Anant Sudarshan, 2024. "The Social Costs of Keystone Species Collapse: Evidence from the Decline of Vultures in India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(10), pages 3007-3040, October.
    5. Frank, Eyal G. & Sudarshan, Anant, 2022. "The Social Costs of Keystone Species Collapse : Evidence From The Decline of Vultures in India," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1433, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    6. Yumei Luo & Kai Reimers & Lei Yang & Jinping Lin, 2021. "Household Drug Management Practices of Residents in a Second-Tier City in China: Opportunities for Reducing Drug Waste and Environmental Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-15, August.
    7. C.R. Ohoro & A.O. Adeniji & A.I. Okoh & O.O. Okoh, 2019. "Distribution and Chemical Analysis of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) in the Environmental Systems: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-31, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:4058-:d:368204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.