IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i11p4011-d367511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Fitness Education Programs Satisfy Fitness Professionals’ Competencies? Integrating Traditional and Revised Importance-Performance Analysis and Three-Factor Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon Chih Ming Ku

    (Department of Social Sport, Lingnan Normal University, No.29, Cunjin Rd., Chikan Dist., Zhangjiang City 524048, Guangdong, China)

  • Chi-Ming Hsieh

    (International Bachelor Program of Agribusiness, National Chung Hsing University, No.145, Xingda Rd., South Dist., Taichung City 402, Taiwan)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess whether fitness education programs could meet the needs or competencies of fitness professionals such as personal trainers and group fitness instructors. A mixed method was adopted to address the objectives of the study. In the first step, a semi-structured interview was conducted with five fitness experts to identify the five dimensions of professional competencies. In the second step, an online survey and paper questionnaires were utilized to collect data from 324 eligible subjects. Traditional importance-performance analysis, revised importance-performance analysis, and the three-factor theory were used to analyze the collected data. The results indicate that “professional skill,” “career development,” and “public relations” are the three most critical professional competencies. “Nutrition” and “coping with stress” should be strengthened and improved in fitness education programs. “Administrative management” is the least important professional competency. Multi-competencies development and lifelong learning are the factors for a successful fitness trainer.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon Chih Ming Ku & Chi-Ming Hsieh, 2020. "Can Fitness Education Programs Satisfy Fitness Professionals’ Competencies? Integrating Traditional and Revised Importance-Performance Analysis and Three-Factor Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:4011-:d:367511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/4011/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/4011/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kurt Matzler & Elmar Sauerwein & Kenneth Heischmidt, 2003. "Importance-performance analysis revisited: the role of the factor structure of customer satisfaction," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 112-129, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Virginia Serrano-Gómez & Oscar García-García & Antonio Rial-Boubeta, 2023. "Using Importance–Performance Analysis (IPA) to Improve Golf Club Management: The Gap between Users and Managers’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Zhang Yangzi & Kenny S. L. Cheah & Mohd Shahril Nizam Bin Shaharom, 2023. "Enhancing Self-Leadership in Online Fitness Education and Training: Exploring Strategies and Addressing Challenges Among Social Media Influencers in Henan Province, China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    3. Yan Hu & Feng Lin & Qizhen Dong & Young-joo Ahn, 2024. "Exploring Cultural and Heritage Attributes at Mount Yunqiu, China, Using Importance–Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. NaHyun Lee & Bong-Seok Kim, 2023. "Differences of Host Country-Destination Image Assessment for International Students According to Risk Perception in COVID-19 Tourism," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    2. Yu Du & Xian Ji & Chenxi Dou & Rui Wang, 2024. "Boosting Winter Green Travel: Prioritizing Built Environment Enhancements for Shared Bike Users Accessing Public Transit in the First/Last Mile Using Machine Learning and Grounded Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Jiacong Wu & Yu Wang & Ru Zhang & Jing Cai, 2018. "An Approach to Discovering Product/Service Improvement Priorities: Using Dynamic Importance-Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Pumpe, Andreas & Vallée, Franz, 2015. "The Total Landed Cost Concept. Begging for Answers," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 31-54, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    5. Michele Preziosi & Alessia Acampora & Maria Claudia Lucchetti & Roberto Merli, 2022. "Delighting Hotel Guests with Sustainability: Revamping Importance-Performance Analysis in the Light of the Three-Factor Theory of Customer Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Xian Ji & Furui Shang & Chang Liu & Qinggong Kang & Rui Wang & Chenxi Dou, 2024. "Prioritizing Environmental Attributes to Enhance Residents’ Satisfaction in Post-Industrial Neighborhoods: An Application of Machine Learning-Augmented Asymmetric Impact-Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    7. Rubensson, Isak & Börjesson, Maria, 2018. "Satisfaction with crowding in public transport," Working papers in Transport Economics 2018:6, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    8. Wang, Xia & Li, Xiang (Robert) & Zhen, Feng & Zhang, JinHe, 2016. "How smart is your tourist attraction?: Measuring tourist preferences of smart tourism attractions via a FCEM-AHP and IPA approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 309-320.
    9. Harman Preet Singh & Mohammad Alshallaqi & Mohammed Altamimi, 2023. "Predicting Critical Factors Impacting Hotel Online Ratings: A Comparison of Religious and Commercial Destinations in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-25, August.
    10. Lai, Ivan Ka Wai & Hitchcock, Michael, 2015. "Importance–performance analysis in tourism: A framework for researchers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 242-267.
    11. Nyarku Kwamena Minta & Oduro Stephen, 2017. "Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA) of Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction in the Ghanaian Banking Industry," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(7), pages 532-550, July.
    12. Asep Saifuddin Chalim & Mauhibur Rakhman & Fadly Usman, 2016. "Improving the Service Quality of Islamic Boarding School based on Importance Performance Analysis Results," Review of Social Sciences, LAR Center Press, vol. 1(2), pages 1-6, February.
    13. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Abrari Vajari, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2020. "Importance – Performance Analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: A case study in a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-150.
    14. Chen, Kuan-Yu, 2014. "Improving importance-performance analysis: The role of the zone of tolerance and competitor performance. The case of Taiwan's hot spring hotels," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 260-272.
    15. Phadermrod, Boonyarat & Crowder, Richard M. & Wills, Gary B., 2019. "Importance-Performance Analysis based SWOT analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 194-203.
    16. Lixuan Zhao & Dewei Fang & Yang Cao & Shan Sun & Liu Han & Yang Xue & Qian Zheng, 2023. "Impact-Asymmetric Analysis of Bike-Sharing Residents’ Satisfaction: A Case Study of Harbin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Yanchun Jin & Yoonseo Park & Jiaohui Yu, 2019. "An Assessment Model for Evaluating Asymmetric Effects of Attribute-Level Performance on Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Jingjing Lin & Xinyang Li & Jinghan Lin, 2024. "Evaluation of Age-Appropriate Public Seats in Comprehensive Parks and Sustainable Design Strategies Based on the Kano-Importance–Performance Analysis Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Alvaro Rodriguez-Valencia & Daniel Rosas-Satizábal & Darío Hidalgo, 2023. "Big effort, little gain for users: lessons from the public transport system reform in Bogotá," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 411-433, June.
    20. Raky Julio & Andres Monzon & Yusak O. Susilo, 2024. "Identifying key elements for user satisfaction of bike-sharing systems: a combination of direct and indirect evaluations," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 407-438, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:4011-:d:367511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.