IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i11p3865-d364655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sprint Interval Running and Continuous Running Produce Training Specific Adaptations, Despite a Similar Improvement of Aerobic Endurance Capacity—A Randomized Trial of Healthy Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Sigbjørn Litleskare

    (Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, 0863 Oslo, Norway
    Department of Sports and Physical Education, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, 2406 Elverum, Norway)

  • Eystein Enoksen

    (Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, 0863 Oslo, Norway)

  • Marit Sandvei

    (Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, 0863 Oslo, Norway)

  • Line Støen

    (Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, 0863 Oslo, Norway)

  • Trine Stensrud

    (Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, 0863 Oslo, Norway)

  • Egil Johansen

    (Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, 0863 Oslo, Norway)

  • Jørgen Jensen

    (Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, 0863 Oslo, Norway)

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate training-specific adaptations to eight weeks of moderate intensity continuous training (CT) and sprint interval training (SIT). Young healthy subjects ( n = 25; 9 males and 16 females) performed either continuous training (30–60 min, 70–80% peak heart rate) or sprint interval training (5–10 near maximal 30 s sprints, 3 min recovery) three times per week for eight weeks. Maximal oxygen consumption, 20 m shuttle run test and 5·60 m sprint test were performed before and after the intervention. Furthermore, heart rate, oxygen pulse, respiratory exchange ratio, lactate and running economy were assessed at five submaximal intensities, before and after the training interventions. Maximal oxygen uptake increased after CT (before: 47.9 ± 1.5; after: 49.7 ± 1.5 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 , p < 0.05) and SIT (before: 50.5 ± 1.6; after: 53.3 ± 1.5 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 , p < 0.01), with no statistically significant differences between groups. Both groups increased 20 m shuttle run performance and 60 m sprint performance, but SIT performed better than CT at the 4th and 5th 60 m sprint after the intervention ( p < 0.05). At submaximal intensities, CT, but not SIT, reduced heart rate ( p < 0.05), whereas lactate decreased in both groups. In conclusion, both groups demonstrated similar improvements of several performance measures including VO 2max , but sprint performance was better after SIT, and CT caused training-specific adaptations at submaximal intensities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sigbjørn Litleskare & Eystein Enoksen & Marit Sandvei & Line Støen & Trine Stensrud & Egil Johansen & Jørgen Jensen, 2020. "Sprint Interval Running and Continuous Running Produce Training Specific Adaptations, Despite a Similar Improvement of Aerobic Endurance Capacity—A Randomized Trial of Healthy Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3865-:d:364655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3865/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3865/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aozhe Wang & Haifeng Zhang & Jianming Liu & Zhiyi Yan & Yaqi Sun & Wantang Su & Ji-Guo Yu & Jing Mi & Li Zhao, 2023. "Targeted Lipidomics and Inflammation Response to Six Weeks of Sprint Interval Training in Male Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Justė Knatauskaitė & Kazimieras Pukėnas & Laima Trinkūnienė & Henning Budde, 2021. "Effects of Different Types of Exercise Training on Fine Motor Skills and Testosterone Concentration in Adolescents: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3865-:d:364655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.