IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i10p3660-d361808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children

Author

Listed:
  • Anyan Huang

    (Mental Health Center, Shantou University Medical College, North Taishan Road, Shantou 515065, China)

  • Kusheng Wu

    (Department of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China)

  • Anna Li

    (Department of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China)

  • Xuanzhi Zhang

    (Mental Health Center, Shantou University Medical College, North Taishan Road, Shantou 515065, China)

  • Yuhang Lin

    (Mental Health Center, Shantou University Medical College, North Taishan Road, Shantou 515065, China)

  • Yanhong Huang

    (Mental Health Center, Shantou University Medical College, North Taishan Road, Shantou 515065, China)

Abstract

Developmental dyslexia (DD) is a common neurobehavioral disorder in children. It refers to the phenomenon in which children with normal intelligence lag significantly behind their peers in reading ability. In China, there is no unified standard for the assessment of dyslexia due to the use of simplified and traditional Chinese characters in different regions. This study was aimed at analyzing the reliability and validity of the self-developed Chinese dyslexia assessment tool named Chinese Reading Ability Test (CRAT), which was suitable for students of grade 3 to 5 in primary school. We randomly selected three primary schools in Shantou city of China, including two in the central district and one in the surrounding district. A total of 1492 students of grades 3 through 5 were recruited. We assessed the reliability of CRAT by test–retest reliability and internal consistency. The validity assessment was realized by discriminant validity, content validity and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For reliability, the test–retest correlation coefficient of the total score of the CRAT was 0.671. The difference between the test–retest was not statistically significant. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the CRAT was 0.75. For validity, the correlation coefficient between the score of each subscale and the total score of the scale ranged from 0.29 to 0.73. The indexes of the three structural equation models all meet the standard ( p > 0.05, χ 2 /df < 2.00, RMSEA < 0.05, GFI > 0.90, AGFI > 0.90, NFI > 0.90, CFI > 0.90 and IFI > 0.90). The fitting effects of the models were good. The CRAT has sufficient reliability and validity which could be used for the assessment and auxiliary diagnosis of Chinese Dyslexia in primary school students of grade 3 to 5.

Suggested Citation

  • Anyan Huang & Kusheng Wu & Anna Li & Xuanzhi Zhang & Yuhang Lin & Yanhong Huang, 2020. "The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3660-:d:361808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3660/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3660/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuhang Lin & Xuanzhi Zhang & Qingjun Huang & Laiwen Lv & Anyan Huang & Ai Li & Kusheng Wu & Yanhong Huang, 2020. "The Prevalence of Dyslexia in Primary School Children and Their Chinese Literacy Assessment in Shantou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Anyan Huang & Mingfan Sun & Xuanzhi Zhang & Yuhang Lin & Xuecong Lin & Kusheng Wu & Yanhong Huang, 2021. "Self-Concept in Primary School Student with Dyslexia: The Relationship to Parental Rearing Styles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3660-:d:361808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.