IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i10p3640-d361395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Older Clients’ Pathway through the Adaptation System for Independent Living in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Wusi Zhou

    (School of Public Administration, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China)

  • Adekunle Sabitu Oyegoke

    (School of Built Environment & Engineering, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK)

  • Ming Sun

    (School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK)

  • Hailong Zhu

    (School of Public Administration, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China)

Abstract

Housing adaptation is recognized as an effective intervention for successful independent living and has been given a greater political priority. However, the current adaptation implementation is fragmented and sometimes confusing. This study is aimed at examining blockages in the adaptation system in the United Kingdom (UK) and identifying practical ways to tackle them. It adopted a mixed-method sequential explanatory research strategy. A questionnaire survey was first conducted in all local authorities in England, Scotland and Wales. This was followed by individual interviews and a focus group with professionals and older clients. The study found that multiple organizations are involved during the delivery of housing adaptations; poor cooperation between them is a major barrier to a seamless service. The adaptation process involves five key stages; there are many inconsistencies and inequities in the process across local authorities. Significant delays are found at all stages, the average length of time taken to complete an adaptation is unacceptably long. There are also many inconsistencies and inequities across different local authorities. This study identified some common deficiencies, which cause inefficiencies and ineffectiveness in housing adaptation practices and makes some recommendations on specific actions that need to be taken at both national and local levels to address them.

Suggested Citation

  • Wusi Zhou & Adekunle Sabitu Oyegoke & Ming Sun & Hailong Zhu, 2020. "Older Clients’ Pathway through the Adaptation System for Independent Living in the UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3640-:d:361395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3640/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3640/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cutchin, Malcolm P., 2003. "The process of mediated aging-in-place: a theoretically and empirically based model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 1077-1090, September.
    2. Wusi Zhou & Adekunle Sabitu Oyegoke & Ming Sun, 2019. "Causes of Delays during Housing Adaptation for Healthy Aging in the UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Jackson, R.J., 2003. "The Impact of the Built Environment on Health: An Emerging Field," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1382-1384.
    4. Phillippa Carnemolla & Catherine Bridge, 2019. "Housing Design and Community Care: How Home Modifications Reduce Care Needs of Older People and People with Disability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francis, Jacinta & Wood, Lisa J. & Knuiman, Matthew & Giles-Corti, Billie, 2012. "Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between Public Open Space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(10), pages 1570-1577.
    2. Minh Thi, Tran Thị, 2019. "Institutional and Cultural Aspects of Care for Rural Elderly in Vietnam," International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (IJAGST), SvedbergOpen, vol. 184(3), September.
    3. McDonald, Noreen C., 2005. "Children’s Travel: Patterns and Influences," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt51c9m01c, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Sixsmith, J. & Sixsmith, A. & Fänge, A. Malmgren & Naumann, D. & Kucsera, C. & Tomsone, S. & Haak, M. & Dahlin-Ivanoff, S. & Woolrych, R., 2014. "Healthy ageing and home: The perspectives of very old people in five European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-9.
    5. Maša Filipovič Hrast & Richard Sendi & Boštjan Kerbler, 2023. "Person–Environment Fit in Urban Neighbourhoods in Slovenia: Challenges and Coping Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Simon Marvin & Will Medd, 2006. "Metabolisms of Obecity: Flows of Fat through Bodies, Cities, and Sewers," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(2), pages 313-324, February.
    7. Jung In Kim & Devini Manouri Senaratna & Jacobo Ruza & Calvin Kam & Sandy Ng, 2015. "Feasibility Study on an Evidence-Based Decision-Support System for Hospital Site Selection for an Aging Population," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Jean C. Bikomeye & Sima Namin & Chima Anyanwu & Caitlin S. Rublee & Jamie Ferschinger & Ken Leinbach & Patricia Lindquist & August Hoppe & Lawrence Hoffman & Justin Hegarty & Dwayne Sperber & Kirsten , 2021. "Resilience and Equity in a Time of Crises: Investing in Public Urban Greenspace Is Now More Essential Than Ever in the US and Beyond," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-39, August.
    9. Ruttana Phetsitong & Patama Vapattanawong, 2022. "Reducing the Physical Burden of Older Persons’ Household Caregivers: The Effect of Household Handrail Provision," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Rishworth, Andrea & Elliott, Susan J., 2019. "Global environmental change in an aging world: The role of space, place and scale," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 128-136.
    11. Arlie Adkins & Carrie Makarewicz & Michele Scanze & Maia Ingram & Gretchen Luhr, 2017. "Contextualizing Walkability: Do Relationships Between Built Environments and Walking Vary by Socioeconomic Context?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(3), pages 296-314, July.
    12. Noreen McDonald, 2008. "Children’s mode choice for the school trip: the role of distance and school location in walking to school," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 23-35, January.
    13. Enembe O. Okokon & Tarja Yli-Tuomi & Taina Siponen & Pekka Tiittanen & Anu W. Turunen & Leena Kangas & Ari Karppinen & Jaakko Kukkonen & Timo Lanki, 2021. "Heterogeneous Urban Exposures and Prevalent Hypertension in the Helsinki Capital Region, Finland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Na-Kyoung Hwang & Sun-Hwa Shim, 2021. "Use of Virtual Reality Technology to Support the Home Modification Process: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Rayman Mohamed, 2018. "Resident Perceptions of Neighborhood Conditions, Food Access, Transportation Usage, and Obesity in a Rapidly Changing Central City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Melanie T. Davern & Lucy Gunn & Billie Giles-Corti & Stephanie David, 2017. "Best Practice Principles for Community Indicator Systems and a Case Study Analysis: How Community Indicators Victoria is Creating Impact and Bridging Policy, Practice and Research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 567-586, March.
    17. Dominika Zawadzka & Natalia Ratajczak-Szponik & Bożena Ostrowska, 2022. "Interdisciplinary Cooperation in Technical, Medical, and Social Sciences: A Focus on Creating Accessibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Sara Chimento-Díaz & Pablo Sánchez-García & Cristina Franco-Antonio & Esperanza Santano-Mogena & Isabel Espino-Tato & Sergio Cordovilla-Guardia, 2022. "Factors Associated with the Acceptance of New Technologies for Ageing in Place by People over 64 Years of Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Magdalena Sacha & Jerzy Sacha & Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, 2020. "Determinants of Multidimensional and Physical Frailty and Their Individual Components: Interactions between Frailty Deficits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Myong Sun Cho & Mi Young Kwon, 2023. "Factors Associated with Aging in Place among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Korea: Findings from a National Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3640-:d:361395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.