IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2019i1p46-d299846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chess Players Increase the Theta Power Spectrum When the Difficulty of the Opponent Increases: An EEG Study

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Pedro Fuentes-García

    (Faculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, Avda: Universidad S/N, 10003 Cáceres, Spain)

  • Santos Villafaina

    (Faculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, Avda: Universidad S/N, 10003 Cáceres, Spain)

  • Daniel Collado-Mateo

    (Centre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28943 Fuenlabrada, Spain)

  • Ricardo Cano-Plasencia

    (Clinical Neurophysiology, San Pedro de Alcántara Hospital, 10003 Cáceres, Spain)

  • Narcis Gusi

    (Faculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, Avda: Universidad S/N, 10003 Cáceres, Spain)

Abstract

The present study aimed to analyze differences in the electroencephalogram (EEG) power spectrum (theta, alpha, and beta) between participants who won (winning group) and those who lost (losing group) in three different chess games: against their same Elo (100% chess games), 25% over their Elo (125% chess games), and 25% under their Elo (75% chess games). EEG was assessed at baseline and during the chess games. Method: 14 male chess players (age: 35.36 ± 13.77 and Elo: 1921 ± 170) played three games of 3 min, plus two additional seconds per move, while EEG was assessed. There were three difficulty levels (75%, 100%, and 125%), with two games (one with white pieces and another with black pieces) per level. The winning group showed higher theta power in the frontal, central, and posterior brain regions when difficulty increased ( p -value < 0.05). Besides this, alpha power showed higher values ( p -value < 0.05) in 125% games than in 75% chess games in C3, T3, T4, T5, and T6. The losing group showed a significant decrease ( p -value < 0.05) in the beta and alpha power spectrum in frontal, central, parietotemporal, and occipital areas, when the opponent’s difficulty increased. Moreover, between groups, analyses showed higher theta power in the losing group than in the winning group, in C3, T5, T6, P4, and Pz ( p -value < 0.05). Therefore, the winning group was able to adapt to each difficulty level, increasing theta power in the frontal, central, and posterior brain areas, as the efficiency hypothesis postulated. These changes were not observed in the losing group. Moreover, increases in alpha power during the most difficult games, in comparison with the easier, could have been caused by creative ideation and divergent thinking, as participants looked for alternative solutions against a higher-skilled opponent.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Pedro Fuentes-García & Santos Villafaina & Daniel Collado-Mateo & Ricardo Cano-Plasencia & Narcis Gusi, 2019. "Chess Players Increase the Theta Power Spectrum When the Difficulty of the Opponent Increases: An EEG Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:46-:d:299846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/46/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/46/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan Pedro Fuentes-García & Telmo Pereira & Maria António Castro & António Carvalho Santos & Santos Villafaina, 2019. "Heart and Brain Responses to Real Versus Simulated Chess Games in Trained Chess Players: A Quantitative EEG and HRV Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:46-:d:299846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.