IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i24p5021-d296143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heart and Brain Responses to Real Versus Simulated Chess Games in Trained Chess Players: A Quantitative EEG and HRV Study

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Pedro Fuentes-García

    (Faculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, Avda: Universidad S/N, 10003 Cáceres, Spain)

  • Telmo Pereira

    (Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra Health School, 3046-854 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Maria António Castro

    (Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra Health School, 3046-854 Coimbra, Portugal
    Centre for Mechanical and Engineering Materials and Processes, University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • António Carvalho Santos

    (Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra Health School, 3046-854 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Santos Villafaina

    (Faculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, Avda: Universidad S/N, 10003 Cáceres, Spain)

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate how the heart and the brain react to playing chess with a computer versus in a real context in chess players. We also aim to investigate if familiarization with simulated practice leads to changes in heart rate variability (HRV) and the electroencephalographic (EEG) power spectrum. We designed a cross-sectional study, enrolling 27 chess players. They were randomly assigned to 3 minutes plus 2-second chess games: one with a computer (simulated scenario), and another in a real context. Additionally, participants were divided into two groups according to their level of familiarization of playing chess in a computer context. While they were playing, HRV and EEG were continuously recorded. Differences in HRV and EEG theta power spectrum between playing chess in a real or a simulated scenario were not found in chess players ( p -value > 0.05). When participants were divided into groups (familiarized and unfamiliarized with simulated chess practice), significant differences were observed in HRV and EEG ( p -value < 0.05). The EEG theta power spectrum was significantly lower, and HRV was higher in unfamiliarized players during the simulated scenario, which could indicate that they were less focused in a simulated environment than in a real context. Therefore, familiarization with simulated environments should be taken into account during the training process to achieve the best performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Pedro Fuentes-García & Telmo Pereira & Maria António Castro & António Carvalho Santos & Santos Villafaina, 2019. "Heart and Brain Responses to Real Versus Simulated Chess Games in Trained Chess Players: A Quantitative EEG and HRV Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5021-:d:296143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5021/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5021/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Sala & Alessandra Gorini & Gabriella Pravettoni, 2015. "Mathematical Problem-Solving Abilities and Chess," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(3), pages 21582440155, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Pedro Fuentes-García & Santos Villafaina & Daniel Collado-Mateo & Ricardo Cano-Plasencia & Narcis Gusi, 2019. "Chess Players Increase the Theta Power Spectrum When the Difficulty of the Opponent Increases: An EEG Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-9, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5021-:d:296143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.