IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i7p1266-d221124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilience, Sense of Coherence, and Coping with Stress as Predictors of Psychological Well-Being in the Course of Schizophrenia. The Study Design

Author

Listed:
  • Bernadetta Izydorczyk

    (Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Krakow 30-348, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Sitnik-Warchulska

    (Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Krakow 30-348, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Kühn-Dymecka

    (Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw 02-957, Poland)

  • Sebastian Lizińczyk

    (Katowice Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Katowice 40-326, Poland)

Abstract

The main research objective was seeking for the predictive role of such personal resources as resilience, sense of coherence, and coping with stress in psychological well-being of schizophrenia patients and their treatment. The study group comprised 201 individuals with schizophrenia, aged between 18 and 62. The following instruments were used: The sense of coherence scale SOC-29, The resilience scale for adults, polish adaptation of the stress appraisal measure, semistructured clinical interview, the positive and negative syndrome scale, the mood scale, and the general health questionnaire. A stepwise regression analysis aimed at selecting a group of significant predictors for the verified factors of psychological well-being in patients suffering from schizophrenia was carried out. The results of the study demonstrated the following to be significant predictors of psychological well-being in patients with schizophrenia: Resilience (explaining significantly the level of schizophrenic symptomatology Beta = −0.30, negative symptoms Beta = −0.385, and cognitive disorders Beta = −0.303), sense of coherence, which significantly predicted mood (in the case of manageability, Beta = 0.580 for positive mood, and Beta = 0.534 for negative mood) and psychiatric symptomatology (comprehensibility, Beta = 0.311 for negative symptoms, Beta = 0.173 for excessive arousal, and Beta = 0.330 for cognitive disorganization). The level of perceived stress appraised as challenge predicted positive mood (Beta = 0.164), while stress appraisal in terms of threat served as a predictor for negative mood and depressiveness (Beta = 0.190). The study results can prove helpful in creating therapeutic and programs and psychiatric rehabilitation for patients with schizophrenia.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernadetta Izydorczyk & Katarzyna Sitnik-Warchulska & Aleksandra Kühn-Dymecka & Sebastian Lizińczyk, 2019. "Resilience, Sense of Coherence, and Coping with Stress as Predictors of Psychological Well-Being in the Course of Schizophrenia. The Study Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:7:p:1266-:d:221124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1266/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1266/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cary L. Cooper & Jill Flint-Taylor & Michael Pearn, 2013. "Building Resilience for Success," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-36783-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanie Duchek, 2018. "Entrepreneurial resilience: a biographical analysis of successful entrepreneurs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 429-455, June.
    2. Ali Azadeh & Delaram Heydarian & Keivan Nemati & Reza Yazdanparast, 2018. "Performance optimization of unique resilient human resource management system in a coal mine industry," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(5), pages 1178-1197, October.
    3. Ioan Sebastian Brumă & Simona-Roxana Ulman & Cristina Cautisanu & Lucian Tanasă & Gabriel Vasile Hoha, 2021. "Sustainability in the Case of Small Vegetable Farmers: A Matrix Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-32, September.
    4. Gabriele Santoro & Antonio Messeni-Petruzzelli & Manlio Giudice, 2021. "Searching for resilience: the impact of employee-level and entrepreneur-level resilience on firm performance in small family firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 455-471, June.
    5. Noval, Laura J., 2016. "On the misguided pursuit of happiness and ethical decision making: The roles of focalism and the impact bias in unethical and selfish behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1-16.
    6. Hui He & Yan Bai & Xia Xiao, 2020. "How Past Failure Predicts Subsequent Entrepreneurial Intention: A Comparative Study of Mainland China and Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Alaa M. S. Azazz & Ibrahim A. Elshaer, 2022. "Amid COVID-19 Pandemic, Entrepreneurial Resilience and Creative Performance with the Mediating Role of Institutional Orientation: A Quantitative Investigation Using Structural Equation Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Khan, Zaheer & Soundararajan, Vivek & Wood, Geoffrey & Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal, 2020. "Employee emotional resilience during post-merger integration across national boundaries: Rewards and the mediating role of fairness norms," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    9. Santoro, Gabriele & Bertoldi, Bernardo & Giachino, Chiara & Candelo, Elena, 2020. "Exploring the relationship between entrepreneurial resilience and success: The moderating role of stakeholders' engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 142-150.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:7:p:1266-:d:221124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.